Linker, Beth (Author)
In World War I America, physical rehabilitation symbolized a political dream, a hope that permanently disabled men could be "rebuilt" into economically viable citizens. Reformers of all political stripes---from industrialists and laborers to educators and physicians---stood behind the movement to federally mandate rehabilitation, believing that the health of the nation rested on the working class man's ability to be a productive wage earner. Physical and vocational rehabilitation became a federal program in 1920 and continued to shape America's health policies---namely through the Veteran's Administration---well into the 1960s. This project focuses on the formative years of the rehabilitation movement, when the idea of physical restoration was first articulated, debated, and instituted. The chief focus of the dissertation is on civilian rehabilitation physicians, orthopedic surgeons, and medical aides, all of whom were hired by the U.S. Army Surgeon General's Office to heal amputee veterans and assist them in returning to the "Great Industrial Army." Using papers from the U.S. Army Surgeon General's Office held at the National Archives and Records Administration, as well as newspapers, periodicals, Congressional debates, and published rehabilitation manuals from the period, I argue that World War I physical rehabilitation should be understood as part of a larger Progressive-era social reform movement rather than merely as a medical specialty. Rehabilitation medical workers were not committed to one body part, system, or medical theory but instead to getting disabled working class men back to the factory and farm in the name of economic and national strength. The medical professionals featured in this dissertation worked in so-called curative workshops rather than traditional clinics. Here they not only rebuilt disabled veterans through exercise, prosthetic limb wear, and vocational training but they also produced educative materials to reform public attitudes about disability, applying a gender norm that defined manliness as the ability to earn a living. Ultimately, these medical professionals promised to eradicate economic dependency among the nation's veteran population, thereby solving what they considered to be the most pressing social problem of disability.
...MoreDescription Cited in Diss. Abstr. Int. A 67/04 (2006). UMI pub. no. 3214246.
Chapter
Frances L. Bernstein;
(2014)
Rehabilitation Staged: How Soviet Doctors "Cured" Disability in the Second World War
(/isis/citation/CBB758001169/)
Chapter
Kim E. Nielsen;
(2014)
Property, Disability, and the Making of the Incompetent Citizen in the United States, 1860s-1940s
(/isis/citation/CBB093838027/)
Chapter
Paul R. Lawrie;
(2014)
"Salvaging the Negro": Race, Rehabilitation, and the Body Politic in World War I America, 1917-1924
(/isis/citation/CBB792394956/)
Article
Beth Linker;
Whitney Laemmli;
(2015)
Half a Man: The Symbolism and Science of Paraplegic Impotence in World War II America
(/isis/citation/CBB496362783/)
Book
Reznick, Jeffrey S.;
(2009)
John Galsworthy and Disabled Soldiers of the Great War: With an Illustrated Selection of His Writings
(/isis/citation/CBB001031296/)
Book
Douglas C. Baynton;
(2016)
Defectives in the Land: Disability and Immigration in the Age of Eugenics
(/isis/citation/CBB814032096/)
Article
Rogers, N.;
(2009)
Polio Chronicles: Warm Springs and Disability Politics in the 1930s
(/isis/citation/CBB000931890/)
Chapter
Daniel Blacke;
(2014)
Disability, Dependency, and the Family in the Early United States
(/isis/citation/CBB020725953/)
Article
Ellis, Jason;
(2013)
“Inequalities of Children in Original Endowment”: How Intelligence Testing Transformed Early Special Education in a North American City School System
(/isis/citation/CBB001202082/)
Book
Sarah F. Rose;
(2017)
No Right to Be Idle: The Invention of Disability, 1840s–1930s
(/isis/citation/CBB247390759/)
Thesis
Byrom, Bradley Allen;
(2004)
A Vision of Self Support: Disability and the Rehabilitation Movement in Progressive America
(/isis/citation/CBB001562082/)
Article
Pitts, Yvonne;
(2012)
Disability, Scientific Authority, and Women's Political Participation at the Turn of the Twentieth-Century United States
(/isis/citation/CBB001450306/)
Article
Baynton, Douglas C.;
(2011)
“These Pushful Days”: Time and Disability in the Age of Eugenics
(/isis/citation/CBB001232064/)
Review
José Luis Peset;
(2015)
Review of "Tiempos de melancolía: Creación y desengaño en la España del Siglo de Oro"
(/isis/citation/CBB778238331/)
Chapter
Audra Jennings;
(2014)
Engendering and Regendering Disability: Gender and Disability Activism in Postwar America
(/isis/citation/CBB080082997/)
Chapter
Allison C. Carey;
(2014)
Parents and Professionals: Parents' Reflections on Professionals, the Support System, and the Family in the Twentieth-Century United States
(/isis/citation/CBB462043764/)
Book
Jenell Johnson;
(2016)
American Lobotomy: A Rhetorical History
(/isis/citation/CBB291777811/)
Chapter
John M. Kinder;
(2014)
"Lest We Forget": Disabled Veterans and the Politics of War Remembrance in the United States
(/isis/citation/CBB468970898/)
Book
Burnham, John Chynoweth;
(2015)
Health Care in America: A History
(/isis/citation/CBB001422615/)
Article
Marion A. Schmidt;
(2017)
Planes of Phenomenological Experience: The Psychology of Deafness as an Early Example of American Gestalt Psychology, 1928–1940
(/isis/citation/CBB049318165/)
Be the first to comment!