Puddephatt, Antony J. (Author)
George Herbert Mead has contributed centrally to an understanding of the self and social action. While various intellectual camps have interpreted Mead differently in order to bolster their own theoretical positions, Herbert Blumer and the symbolic interactionists have been the most successful in expositing and defining his relevance to the sociological public. The interactionists have made central the self-reflective, voluntary, and symbolic aspects of Mead's thought, while largely neglecting Mead's social pragmatism and the non-symbolic processes that would provide a fuller conception of the self, meaning, and social action. This thesis takes these more neglected aspects of his thought seriously, and shows how a greater attention to non-symbolic processes may contribute fruitfully to contemporary sociological theory. I accomplish this broad task in three separate but related research articles. The first article reflects back on the debate surrounding Herbert Blumer's interpretation of Mead, and argues that the pre-reflective and implicit aspects of Mead's analysis of the social act stand to enrich interactionist theory. The second article assesses a specific school of thought termed the "social construction of technology." I show that Mead's non-dualist conception of the social, combined with his theory of emergence, would allow scholars in this field to move beyond the various pitfalls associated with traditional social constructionist approaches. The third article presents Mead's much neglected yet surprisingly modern social theory of scientific practice. Uncovering this multi-faceted understanding of science further helps to elaborate Mead's positions on meaning and knowledge in ways that differ from social constructionist interpretations of his thought. The thesis concludes by considering Mead's theoretical position on meaning and knowledge in broad terms, assessing his theory of creativity and innovation, and presenting the shortcomings in the present study to suggest directions for future research.
...MoreDescription Cited in Diss. Abstr. Int. A 68/06 (2007). Pub. no. AAT NR28264.
Book
Marcum, James A.;
(2005)
Thomas Kuhn's Revolution
(/isis/citation/CBB000850375/)
Article
Nakayama, Shigeru;
(2012)
The Normal Scientific Point of View of Practicing Scientists
(/isis/citation/CBB001251529/)
Article
Papayannakos, Dimitris P.;
(2008)
Philosophical Skepticism Not Relativism Is the Problem with the Strong Programme in Science Studies and with Educational Constructivism
(/isis/citation/CBB001032866/)
Article
Michela Massimi;
(2015)
‘Working in a New World’: Kuhn, Constructivism, and Mind-Dependence
(/isis/citation/CBB470924164/)
Article
Freedman, Karyn L.;
(2005)
Naturalized Epistemology, or What the Strong Programme Can't Explain
(/isis/citation/CBB000501557/)
Chapter
Zittel, Claus;
(2002)
Konstruktionsprobleme des Sozialkonstruktivismus
(/isis/citation/CBB000320005/)
Chapter
Detel, Wolfgang;
(2002)
Der Sozialkonstruktivismus und die Wissenschaftsgeschichtsschreibung des 17. Jahrhunderts
(/isis/citation/CBB000320004/)
Article
Kaiser, David;
(2012)
In Retrospect: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
(/isis/citation/CBB001320445/)
Article
Akera, Atsushi;
(2007)
Constructing a Representation for an Ecology of Knowledge: Methodological Advances in the Integration of Knowledge and Its Various Contexts
(/isis/citation/CBB000780234/)
Book
Knorr-Cetina, Karin;
(1999)
Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge
(/isis/citation/CBB000501122/)
Article
Lamy, Jérôme;
Saint-Martin, Arnaud;
(2011)
Sciences et État: note critique sur quelques propositions théoriques
(/isis/citation/CBB001420555/)
Article
Mead, Walter B.;
(2011)
A Symposium on the Relevance of Michael Polanyi's Insights to a Reformulated Understanding of Science, Technology, and Society
(/isis/citation/CBB001034400/)
Article
Ito, Kenji;
(2012)
Thomas Kuhn's The Structure of Scientific Revolutions and Early Social Studies of Science in Japan
(/isis/citation/CBB001251533/)
Article
Li, Bin;
Ren, Dingcheng;
(2012)
The First Fifty Years of The Structure of Scientific Revolutions in Mainland China
(/isis/citation/CBB001251530/)
Article
Fu, Daiwie;
(2012)
Kuhn's Structure of Scientific Revolutions and Developments of History and Philosophy of Science and Science and Technology Studies in Taiwan: A Short Story
(/isis/citation/CBB001251532/)
Article
Yi, Sang Wook;
(2012)
Kuhn's The Structure of Scientific Revolutions in South Korea
(/isis/citation/CBB001251531/)
Article
Mayoral de Lucas, Juan V.;
(2009)
Intensions, Belief and Science: Kuhn's Early Philosophical Outlook (1940--1945)
(/isis/citation/CBB000932498/)
Article
Zhang, Mei-Fang;
(2012)
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions and STS Studies in Mainland China
(/isis/citation/CBB001251534/)
Chapter
Sturm, Thomas;
Gigerenzer, Gerd;
(2006)
How Can We Use the Distinction between Discovery and Justification? On Weaknesses of the Strong Programme in Sociology of Science
(/isis/citation/CBB001033922/)
Article
Harding, Sandra;
(2009)
Postcolonial and Feminist Philosophies of Science and Technology: Convergences and Dissonances
(/isis/citation/CBB001022552/)
Be the first to comment!