Thomas, Gerald William (Author)
This dissertation traces the intellectual trajectory of the field of operations research (OR) from its origins in World War II to approximately the year 1960. It explores how OR transformed from an adjunct to military planning practices into a profession encompassing military, theoretical, and practitioner subcultures. It pays particular attention to the influence of the wartime experience of scientists working in OR groups on later manifestations of the field. In particular, it argues that maintaining relevance to actual acts of policymaking both drove OR to adopt a canon of mathematical theory in order to distinguish it from more general consulting professionals, and that many of its institutional innovations were designed specifically to ensure that those trained in theoretical techniques could apply their skills to practical situations. This approach differs from other approaches in that it downplays any notion of operations research as a rationalizing agent in postwar policymaking. Prior explorations of the "expert" cultures in which OR is typically included stress that they reinforced the dominant American military-industrial power structure by creating tools of social control and by justifying policy decisions using the authority inherent in quantitative science. This dissertation argues against this historiographical approach, primarily by arguing against the division between scientific and non-scientific methods of policymaking. Because OR relied so strongly upon its compatibility with extant methods of policymaking, emphasizing the status of OR as a special scientific approach seems fruitless. This point seems especially true given that most OR studies were not expected to settle political controversies, but to make mundane day- to-day policymaking more robust. I offer an alternative analytical framework that eschews divisions between the rational and the intuitive, and replaces them with more appropriate divisions between the rational and the arbitrary. This framework focuses less on knowledge production and application, than on the trading of insights between distinct intellectual communities. The framework yields new information about why OR's proponents made the intellectual choices and built the institutions that they did, and what role OR historically played in military and industrial policymaking, and promises to shed new light on the nature of the policy- oriented sciences.
...MoreDescription Cited in Diss. Abstr. Int. A 68/05 (2007). Pub. no. AAT 3265109.
Article
Rau, Erik P.;
(2005)
Combat Science: The Emergence of Operational Research in World War II
(/isis/citation/CBB000630810/)
Chapter
Pickering, Andrew;
(2000)
Beyond the Great Divide: Internal and External Transformations of Science in World War II
(/isis/citation/CBB000101963/)
Article
Smith, Christopher;
(2014)
How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bombe: Machine Research and Development and Bletchley Park
(/isis/citation/CBB001420245/)
Book
William Thomas;
(2015)
Rational Action: The Sciences of Policy in Britain and America, 1940-1960
(/isis/citation/CBB219429330/)
Book
Morse, Phillip McCord;
Kimball, George E.;
(2003)
Methods of Operations Research
(/isis/citation/CBB000471254/)
Chapter
Field, J. V.;
(2009)
British Cryptanalysis: The Breaking of “Fish” Traffic
(/isis/citation/CBB000960225/)
Book
McKay, Sinclair;
(2010)
The Secret Life of Bletchley Park: The History of the Wartime Codebreaking Centre by the Men and Women Who Were There
(/isis/citation/CBB001212751/)
Book
Ratcliff, R. A.;
(2006)
Delusions of Intelligence: Enigma, Ultra and the End of Secure Ciphers
(/isis/citation/CBB000930042/)
Book
Marion Girard Dorsey;
(2023)
Holding Their Breath: How the Allies Confronted the Threat of Chemical Warfare in World War II
(/isis/citation/CBB896773160/)
Thesis
Epting, Susan;
(2012)
Casualties of the Spirit: The Development of Military Psychology and Psychiatry in the United States, Great Britain, and Germany, 1914--1945
(/isis/citation/CBB001562791/)
Article
Tyler Morton;
(2019)
Linguists get Their Wings: Airborne Voice Intercept Operators in World War II
(/isis/citation/CBB219263940/)
Article
Thomas Webb;
Penny Summerfield;
Mark Riley;
Chris Pearson;
(2022)
‘We Cows are in a Very Serious Predicament’: Constructions of Land Girls and Cattle in Britain in the Second World War
(/isis/citation/CBB437823292/)
Book
McRae, Kenneth D;
(2014)
Nuclear Dawn: F.E. Simon and the Race for Atomic Weapons in World War II
(/isis/citation/CBB001422212/)
Article
Jones, Edgar;
(2006)
“LMF”: The Use of Psychiatric Stigma in the Royal Air Force during the Second World War
(/isis/citation/CBB001030705/)
Article
EDWARD P. F. ROSE;
(2024)
Military Geology: An American Term of World War I Re-Defined for the British Army at the End of World War II
(/isis/citation/CBB692185801/)
Book
Copeland, B. Jack;
(2006)
Colossus: The Secrets of Bletchley Park's Code-Breaking Computers
(/isis/citation/CBB000741942/)
Article
Audin, Michèle;
(2009)
Publier sous l'Occupation I. Autour du cas de Jacques Feldbau et de l'Académie des sciences
(/isis/citation/CBB000954344/)
Book
Hore, Peter;
(2003)
Patrick Blackett: Sailor, Scientist, and Socialist
(/isis/citation/CBB000301992/)
Article
Jones, Edgar;
Wessely, Simon;
(2010)
British Prisoners-of-War: From Resilience to Psychological Vulnerability: Reality or Perception
(/isis/citation/CBB001030545/)
Article
Velleman, Barry L.;
(2008)
The “Scientific Linguist” Goes to War: The United States A.S.T. Program in Foreign Languages
(/isis/citation/CBB001211635/)
Be the first to comment!