Between Soul and Precision: Ernst Mach's Biological Empiricism and the Social Democratic Philosophy of Science (2007)
Charak, Gregory Scott (Author)
University of California, San Diego
Cartwright, Nancy
Edition Details: Advisor: Cartwright, Nancy
Physical Details: 355 pp.
Language: English
This dissertation has three primary aims. The first is to offer a new perspective on the philosophical world view of Ernst Mach, and in particular on his well-known doctrine of elements. This is achieved primarily within a historical context, specifically by exposing two misrepresentations of Mach's thought framed by two of his most famous detractors, Vladimir Lenin and Max Planck. Contrary to their claims that Mach was either a reactionary idealist or a solipsistic positivist, I argue that Mach's philosophical standpoint is best described as a biological empiricism. This re-constructed position is developed throughout the text as the one that best captures the variety of roles actually played by the doctrine of elements within Mach's philosophy. The second aim of the dissertation is to explore the relevance of Mach's standpoint in the philosophy of science to questions of politics and justice. In order to do so, however, an additional standpoint, one linked to Mach's both historically and conceptually, must be developed. This is the standpoint of technological empiricism, which I re-construct from the works of Alexander Bogdanov, Otto Neurath, and Nancy Cartwright. Like Mach, these thinkers are dedicated to the priority of human experience in gathering and deploying scientific knowledge. Their focus, however, is not on the psychological, but on the technical, social, and physical aspect of that experience. Once the relevant similarities and differences are developed, I explore the political aspects of biological and technological empiricism, identifying a series of both shared and independent commitments to the freedom of thought, psychological development, economic planning, and social solidarity. These ideas are synthesized into a common standpoint that moreover views science as a tool of human adaptation, capable of making contributions to both welfare and justice. I conceptualize this standpoint as the social democratic philosophy of science. The third aim of the dissertation is to revisit the polemics of Lenin and Planck in order to expose the shared ethical concerns that lie behind their caricatured attacks on Mach's 'positivism.' The goal is to lend an additional voice to the claim that the opposition between sobriety and resolve is one- sided and untenable.
...MoreDescription Cited in Diss. Abstr. Int. A 68/07 (2008). Pub. no. AAT 3274584.
Similar Citations
Chapter
Gereon Wolters;
(2018)
Mach e la relatività: una storia infinita ambientata a HOPOSia?
(/isis/citation/CBB146853924/)
Article
Siemsen, Hayo;
(2010)
The Mach-Planck Debate Revisited: Democratization of Science or Elite Knowledge?
(/isis/citation/CBB001034670/)
Article
Stöltzner, Michael;
(2003)
The Principle of Least Action as the Logical Empiricist's Shibboleth
(/isis/citation/CBB000340849/)
Book
Uebel, Thomas E.;
(2007)
Empiricism at the Crossroads: The Vienna Circle's Protocol-Sentence Debate
(/isis/citation/CBB001230414/)
Book
Parrini, Paolo;
Salmon, Wesley C.;
Salmon, Merrilee H.;
(2003)
Logical Empiricism: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives
(/isis/citation/CBB001213664/)
Article
Pietro Gori;
(2021)
Ernst Mach’s Contribution to the Philosophy of Science in Light of Mary B. Hesse’s Postempiricism
(/isis/citation/CBB711827914/)
Book
Blackmore, John T.;
(2009)
Ernst Mach's Philosophy---Pro and Con---with Contributions by Brentano, Carnap, Einstein, Husserl, Lenin, Mach, Planck, Popper, and Others
(/isis/citation/CBB001024109/)
Article
Wulz, Monika;
(2015)
Gedankenexperimente im ökonomischen Überschuss. Wissenschaft und Ökonomie bei Ernst Mach
(/isis/citation/CBB001551246/)
Article
Siemsen, H.;
(2010)
The Psychophysiological Founding of the Analogy Concept by Ernst Mach
(/isis/citation/CBB001232293/)
Chapter
Marco Buzzoni;
(2018)
Ernst Mach interprete di Pierre Duhem. Valore e limiti della sperimentazione mentale
(/isis/citation/CBB306281511/)
Chapter
Erik C. Banks;
(2018)
The Case for Mach's Neutral Monism
(/isis/citation/CBB571671358/)
Chapter
Daniela Steila;
(2018)
La fortuna di Mach nella Russia pre-rivoluzionaria
(/isis/citation/CBB928582006/)
Chapter
Pietro Gori;
(2018)
Ernst Mach dal punto di vista storico-critico
(/isis/citation/CBB020210950/)
Book
Pietro Gori;
(2018)
Ernst Mach: tra scienza e filosofia
(/isis/citation/CBB991429309/)
Chapter
Massimo Ferrari;
(2018)
“Uno strenuo difensore” di Mach: John Bernhard Stallo
(/isis/citation/CBB213065857/)
Chapter
Luca Guidetti;
(2018)
Il problema dell'analogia in Ernst Mach
(/isis/citation/CBB358140394/)
Chapter
Susanna Zellini;
(2018)
Wittgenstein, Mach e il senso comune
(/isis/citation/CBB902592785/)
Book
Weber, Heiko;
(2000)
Monistische und antimonistische Weltanschauung: Eine Auswahlbibliographie
(/isis/citation/CBB000110659/)
Article
Wegener, Daan;
(2010)
De-Anthropomorphizing Energy and Energy Conservation: The Case of Max Planck and Ernst Mach
(/isis/citation/CBB000933695/)
Chapter
Paolo Parrini;
(2018)
Ernst Mach and the Disenchantment of Metaphysics
(/isis/citation/CBB153044104/)
Be the first to comment!