Thesis ID: CBB001561194

The Atomic Confederacy: Europe's Quest for Nuclear Weapons and the Making of the New World Order (2008)

unapi

Mallard, Grégoire (Author)


Princeton University
Wuthnow, Robert


Publication Date: 2008
Edition Details: Advisor: Wuthnow, Robert
Physical Details: 916 pp.
Language: English

My dissertation examines how the globalization of modern science and technology has redefined the power and legitimacy of modern nation-states. Taking the transatlantic history of postwar nuclear science as a case in point, I focus on proposals to establish international organizations (the International Atomic Energy Agency) and/or supranational nuclear communities (the European Community of Atomic Energy), formulated by the US government and West European governments between the 1940s and the 1970s. Drawing and expanding on the literature in historical sociology and political science on the formation of nation-states and the role that transnational networks play in international relations, I ask: How were national governments persuaded to delegate control over the regulation of nuclear activities, either to global international organizations, or to West European supranational communities? How did informal transatlantic networks successfully convince national political leaders, bureaucracies and experts to support their plans? How do these attempts to disengage nuclear science from national control change our conceptions of sovereignty and international relations? To answer these questions, I compare the role of two transatlantic networks of nuclear scientists and policymakers whose expert skills, social capital, and access to political elites varied--liberal and cosmopolitan internationalists as opposed to European federalists. The first network of cosmopolitans and international liberals was mostly composed of American and European nuclear scientists who worked during the war for the Manhattan Project, as well as concerned citizens and scholars who joined their effort for international control of the atom after the war. The second network, of European federalists, was comprised mostly of American and European lawyers, businessmen and politicians gathered around Jean Monnet and hoped to secure a new space for European sovereignty. As I show, the social characteristics of these two transatlantic networks determined the extent to which they succeeded in achieving their goals, and moreover I am able to specify three forms of action by which they pursued their differing political and strategic aims: (1) as norm entrepreneurs , able to articulate different sets of norms and values justifying the delegation of sovereignty they asked for; (2) as policy entrepreneurs , able to articulate new policy paradigms to solve the strategic problems of national nuclear proliferation and East/West military gap in Europe; (3) as policy translators , able to translate the specific policies they proposed into terms that were acceptable to those who disagreed with their policy paradigm within national governments and bureaucracies. Based on archival research in the US and in the archives of the European Community, I track the series of transatlantic controversies between these cosmopolitan, international liberals and European federalists. The characteristics of their networks explain the specific formation of the atomic confederacy which eventually tied together Western nuclear development. My model of how transnational networks affect international law by acting as norm and policy entrepreneurs as well as policy translators allows me to re-think how nation-states, international organizations, and transnational networks operate together in a globalized world.

...More

Description Cited in Diss. Abstr. Int. A 69/08 (2009). Pub. no. AAT 3323187.


Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB001561194/

Similar Citations

Book Gavin, Francis J.; (2012)
Nuclear Statecraft: History and Strategy in America's Atomic Age (/isis/citation/CBB001550424/)

Book Kaufman, Scott; (2013)
Project Plowshare: The Peaceful Use of Nuclear Explosives in Cold War America (/isis/citation/CBB001320942/)

Article Hecht, Gabrielle; (2007)
A Cosmogram for Nuclear Things (/isis/citation/CBB000741719/)

Book Elisabeth Roehrlich; (2022)
Inspectors for Peace: A History of the International Atomic Energy Agency (/isis/citation/CBB775978058/)

Article Bahgat, Gawdat; (2006)
Nuclear Proliferation: The Islamic Republic of Iran (/isis/citation/CBB001031134/)

Thesis Greene, Benjamin Patrick; (2004)
Crucified on a Cross of Atoms: Eisenhower, Science, and the Nuclear Test Ban Debate, 1945--1963 (/isis/citation/CBB001562077/)

Book Jacob Darwin Hamblin; (2021)
The Wretched Atom: America's Global Gamble with Peaceful Nuclear Technology (/isis/citation/CBB105394498/)

Book Martin Theaker; (2018)
Britain, Europe and Civil Nuclear Energy, 1945–62: Power Politics (/isis/citation/CBB014709955/)

Article Pinkus, Binyamin; (2002)
Atomic Power to Israel's Rescue: French-Israeli Nuclear Cooperation, 1949--1957 (/isis/citation/CBB000641102/)

Article Uekoetter, Frank; (2012)
Fukushima, Europe, and the Authoritarian Nature of Nuclear Technology (/isis/citation/CBB001232551/)

Book Mazower, Mark; (2012)
Governing the World: The History of an Idea (/isis/citation/CBB001321238/)

Article Hogg, Jonathan; Laucht, Christoph; (2012)
Introduction: British Nuclear Culture (/isis/citation/CBB001251855/)

Book Mueller, John E.; (2010)
Atomic Obsession: Nuclear Alarmism from Hiroshima to Al-Qaeda (/isis/citation/CBB001230659/)

Book Rodney P. Carlisle; Joan M. Zenzen; (1996)
Supplying the Nuclear Arsenal: American Production-reactors, 1942-1992 (/isis/citation/CBB967814772/)

Authors & Contributors
Rentetzi, Maria
Hecht, Gabrielle
Elisabeth Roehrlich
Martin Theaker
Gavin, Francis J.
Zenzen, Joan M.
Concepts
Nuclear power; atomic energy
Science and politics
Nuclear weapons; atomic weapons
International relations
Science and government
Cold War
Time Periods
20th century, late
21st century
20th century
19th century
Places
United States
Japan
Europe
Israel
Iran
Great Britain
Institutions
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
Federation of American Scientists
League of Nations
United Nations
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment