Thesis ID: CBB001561164

How Experiments Are Remembered: The Discovery of Nuclear Fission, 1938--1968 (2008)

unapi

Yruma, Jeris Stueland (Author)


Princeton University
Gordin, Michael D.


Publication Date: 2008
Edition Details: Advisor: Gordin, Michael D.
Physical Details: 239 pp.
Language: English

The discovery of nuclear fission in 1938-1939 involved four individuals separated by geography, politics, and scientific discipline. Otto Hahn and Fritz Strassmann were chemists in Berlin who in December of 1938 discovered barium in a sample of irradiated uranium. Lise Meitner and Otto Robert Frisch were physicists who had each emigrated first from Vienna to Berlin, and then, facing increasing persecution from the Nazi regime due to their Jewish heritage, from Berlin to Stockholm and Copenhagen, respectively. The two (who were also aunt and nephew) spent Christmas of 1938 together in the Swedish countryside, where they pondered the Hahn and Strassmann's (also Meitner's former colleagues) finding. Meitner and Frisch soon explained Hahn and Strassmann's data by proposing a new form of nuclear decay, in which a heavy nucleus splits approximately in two, which they termed "nuclear fission." Frisch also verified the existence of this decay through physical methods, different from the chemical methods of Hahn and Strassmann. In this work I examine the discovery of nuclear fission from two primary perspectives, the first historical and the second historiographical. Through both parts, I follow the two scientists who were arguably the most responsible for the fission discovery, and who have been the most celebrated as its discoverers: Lise Meitner and Otto Hahn. In telling the fission story through the lenses provided by Hahn and Meitner--their diaries, correspondence, and the stories told about them by others--I seek most fundamentally to divorce the history of fission from that of the atomic bomb. As I argue in the work that follows, once the atomic bomb gained the cultural resonance it still possesses today, it changed the way in which we understand our history. The history of the scientific study of the atom and atomic nucleus before 1945 was no longer seen in its own light, as developments that contributed to the construction of a certain paradigm of the natural world, but as developments that led to the construction of the atomic bomb. In studying fission through the eyes of Meitner and Hahn, neither of whom worked on the Manhattan project, I gain new insight into this history. In sum, I offer two arguments. One, in terms of history itself, I argue that historians of science should understand the discovery of fission in terms of the early twentieth century culture of the science of radioactivity, not in terms of the post-1945 culture of nuclear physics. Two, on a historiographical level, I argue that the way in which the discovery of nuclear fission has often previously been understood is the result of the post-1945 intersection of the world of physics and the spheres of politics and the public, and in particular the conflation of the roles of public scientist and eminent physicist. In the first part of this work (chapters one and two) I offer a careful study, based on drafts of scientific journal articles and personal correspondence preserved at the Max Planck Society Archives in Berlin and the Churchill Archives Center in Cambridge, England, of the process by which Otto Hahn, Lise Meitner and Fritz Strassmann came to conclude that in irradiating uranium with neutrons, rather than producing elements heavier than uranium, they were causing the uranium nuclei to split--or "fission"--into two lighter nuclei. Contrary to previous work which has seen the moment in December 1938 when Hahn and Strassmann found evidence of barium in their irradiated uranium as the moment when fission was discovered, I argue that the discovery of fission was a process, and that Meitner, Hahn and Strassmann did not completely dismiss their v previous conclusions until months after the December finding. Viewing the fission discovery as a process also serves to offer an alternative to previous histories that have depicted the discovery of fission as simply a step on the path toward the atomic bomb. Contrary to this, I explore the multiple theoretical and experimental applications for fission foreseen by scientists in 1939, before most of them had even conceived of the possibility of an atomic bomb. The atomic bomb, however, does loom large in the second part of this work (chapters three, four and five), in which I examine the different ways in which the fission story was told in the thirty years between the discovery and Otto Hahn and Lise Meitner's deaths in 1968. In chapter three I focus on the role of scientific disciplines in these narratives, and in particular the way in which Otto Hahn attempted to establish both his identity as a chemist, and chemistry's role in the discovery of fission in the narratives he created. Ultimately, however, Hahn was willing to leave the rhetoric of chemistry behind in return for personal fame as fission's discoverer. In chapter four I turn to Lise Meitner who, because she had had to flee Berlin before the fission discovery, was in the American press of 1945 widely and prominently celebrated as the discoverer of fission, and as the Jewish woman who kept the secret of the bomb safe from Hitler. Some previous historians have overlooked this brief period during which Meitner received the vast majority of credit for the discovery, and instead assumed that because she was a woman her role in the discovery was always minimized. Soon after receiving credit for the discovery, however, Meitner lost this credit, and it is the primary reason for this to which I turn in chapter five. I argue that in the post-World War II world, largely as a result of their new status as creators of the atomic bomb, eminent scientists were expected to play a political role in the public sphere, to become "public scientists." Because Meitner was unwilling to play this role, while Hahn was willing to do so, the fame that had been Meitner's was swiftly transferred to Hahn. As a result, Meitner was soon forgotten and Hahn became the discoverer of fission, which he remained through 1968, and to great extent through the present day.

...More

Description Cited in Diss. Abstr. Int. A 69/12 (2009). Pub. no. AAT 3338704.


Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB001561164/

Similar Citations

Article Morgenweck-Lambrinos, Vera; Trömel, Martin; (2001)
Wissenschaft und Legende: eine Nachbetrachtung zu Lise Meitner, Otto Hahn und die Kernspaltung: eine Legende aus unseren Tagen (/isis/citation/CBB000100528/)

Article Sime, Ruth Lewin; (2000)
The search for transuranium elements and the discovery of nuclear fission (/isis/citation/CBB000110039/)

Book Hoffmann, Klaus; (2001)
Otto Hahn: Achievement and Responsibility (/isis/citation/CBB000101807/)

Article Sime, Ruth Lewin; (1986)
The discovery of protactinium (/isis/citation/CBB000053952/)

Article Crawford, Elisabeth; Sime, Ruth Lewin; Walker, Mark; (1996)
A Nobel tale of wartime injustice (/isis/citation/CBB000072097/)

Article Treumann, Rudolf A.; (1991)
A post-fission perspective of the discovery of nuclear fission (/isis/citation/CBB000029557/)

Article Sime, Ruth Lewin; (2006)
The Politics of Memory: Otto Hahn and the Third Reich (/isis/citation/CBB000641858/)

Article B. Cameron Reed; (2018)
From Fission to Censorship: 18 Months on the Road to the Bomb (/isis/citation/CBB100947755/)

Chapter Giulio Maltese; (2009)
Enrico Fermi e il suo ruolo nella scienza, in Italia e in America (/isis/citation/CBB953079691/)

Article Cesareo, Roberto; (2000)
Dalla radioattività artificiale alla fissione nucleare: 1934-1939 (/isis/citation/CBB000111841/)

Article Walker, Mark; (2006)
Otto Hahn: Responsibility and Repression (/isis/citation/CBB000740767/)

Chapter Vincenzo Cioci; (2016)
Alvin Weinberg e il nucleare: Riflessioni su Hiroshima 70 anni dopo (/isis/citation/CBB391197810/)

Chapter Vincenzo Cioci; (2009)
Szilard e Rasetti: due scienziati a confronto (/isis/citation/CBB787431166/)

Article B. Cameron Reed; (2020)
Walther Bothe's Graphite: Physics, Impurities, and Blame in the German Nuclear Program (/isis/citation/CBB340773011/)

Authors & Contributors
Sime, Ruth Lewin
Cioci, Vincenzo
Walker, Mark
Reed, B. Cameron
Voigt, Annette E.
Turchetti, Simone
Journals
Physics in Perspective
Annalen der Physik
Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie
Physis: Rivista Internazionale di Storia della Scienza
NTM: Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Naturwissenschaften, Technik und Medizin
Nature
Publishers
Luigi Pellegrini Editore
Guaraldi
Pavia University Press
Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft
Springer-Verlag
Moos
Concepts
Nuclear fission
Physics
Nuclear weapons; atomic weapons
Science and society
Atomic, nuclear, and particle physics
Chemistry
People
Hahn, Otto
Meitner, Lise
Fermi, Enrico
Strassmann, Fritz
Einstein, Albert
Weinberg, Alvin Martin
Time Periods
20th century
20th century, early
Places
Germany
Italy
United States
Hiroshima-shi (Japan)
Europe
Institutions
Kaiser-Wilhelm-Institut für Physik, Berlin
Kaiser-Wilhelm-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften
Hahn-Meitner-Institut Berlin
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment