Brown, David S. (Author)
This dissertation tells of the efforts of a group of scientifically trained physicians in Charleston, South Carolina to gain power and authority within their profession, and their community, during the Antebellum Period. Physicians were not ultimately able to declare professional supremacy and near monopolistic authority in health care until scientists discovered microscopic pathogens during the bacteriological revolution of the last half of the nineteenth century. This work begins with a brief review of the medical history of Charleston and its physicians and recounts the difficulties faced as they tried to establish themselves as medical authorities in a new world. The story then shifts to look at the competitors physicians faced in a medical marketplace that was much more diverse and competitive than that found in society today. A significant part of this work focuses on the problem of yellow fever because historians have highlighted the fear of this disease as one of the greatest influences on the development of medical and public health policies and institutions, particularly in the South, during the first half of the nineteenth century. Public health workers and officials, supported by physicians, were almost entirely concerned with discovering the origins and controlling the appearance of epidemic disease. Once yellow fever was present in the city, physicians found themselves unable to effectively treat the disease or stop its transmission. In fact, they could not even arrive at a consensus with regard to any of these aspects of the disease, and this served to hamper their efforts to increase their cachet in the community. The last three chapters of the dissertation illustrate how physicians fought to capture the mantle of authenticity in the field of health care at a time when they could not command authority through the adoption of their professional precepts. On Christmas Eve, 1789, several of Charleston's preeminent physicians established the Medical Society of South Carolina. This body improved cohesion within their ranks and created a space where physicians could construct their identity, adopt professional standards, and begin to cement their position in the community as the sole medical authority. In the 1820s, the physicians founded the Medical College of South Carolina, a space where professional orthodoxy could be produced, authenticated, and reproduced for dissemination. Physicians in Charleston also eased professional anxieties and asserted their authority by embracing a policy of regional medical separatism that dovetailed with sectionalism so prevalent in the 1850s. As individuals with common goals coalesce into groups trying to take power, they seek to create structures that support their efforts. Institutions are created to allow space for groups of people to construct their identities, and produce discursive formations that help them promote their agendas. References References (79)
...MoreDescription Cited in Diss. Abstr. Int. A 71/05 (2010). Pub. no. AAT 3402749.
Article
Crosby, David L.;
(2013)
The Surgeon and the Abolitionist: William Chancellor and Anthony Benezet
(/isis/citation/CBB001200549/)
Thesis
Lin, Chien-Ting;
(2014)
Fugitive Subjects of the “Mi-Yi”: Politics of Life and Labor in Taiwan's Medical Modernity
(/isis/citation/CBB001567627/)
Article
Bittel, Carla Jean;
(2005)
Science, Suffrage, and Experimentation: Mary Putnam Jacobi and the Controversy over Vivisection in Late Nineteenth-Century America
(/isis/citation/CBB000800010/)
Article
Appel, Toby A.;
(2010)
The Thomsonian Movement, the Regular Profession, and the State in Antebellum Connecticut: A Case Study of the Repeal of Early Medical Licensing Laws
(/isis/citation/CBB001034280/)
Book
Chantal Stebbings;
(2017)
Tax, Medicines and the Law: From Quackery to Pharmacy
(/isis/citation/CBB582422523/)
Thesis
Parzynski, Catherine S.;
(2004)
Maternal Medicine: Changing Perceptions of Women's Place in Medicine, Settlement to 1860
(/isis/citation/CBB001561838/)
Article
Reitz, Elizabeth J.;
Zierden, Martha A.;
(2014)
Wildlife in Urban Charleston, South Carolina, USA
(/isis/citation/CBB001450105/)
Article
Eamon, William;
(2009)
Physicians and the Reform of Popular Culture in Early Modern Europe
(/isis/citation/CBB001023375/)
Article
Lei, Sean Hsiang-lin;
(2003)
Fuzheren de yisheng yu youxinyang de binren: Zhongxiyi lunzheng yu yibinguanxi zai Mingguo shiqi de zhuangbian
(/isis/citation/CBB000350225/)
Thesis
Gordon, Ronald J.;
(2014)
“The Claims of Religion Upon Medical Men”: Protestant Christianity and Medicine in Nineteenth-Century America
(/isis/citation/CBB001567596/)
Chapter
Giovanni Silvano;
(2020)
Philip Pinel tra Francia e America nell’Ottocento
(/isis/citation/CBB972746471/)
Book
Imber, Jonathan B.;
(2008)
Trusting Doctors: The Decline of Moral Authority in American Medicine
(/isis/citation/CBB000850399/)
Thesis
Hogarth, Rana Asali;
(2012)
Comparing Anatomies, Constructing Races: Medicine and Slavery in the Atlantic World, 1787--1838
(/isis/citation/CBB001561004/)
Thesis
Thompson, Catherine L.;
(2009)
“Dr. Greene Is Not God!”: Patient-Physicians Relations in Early America, 1750--1850
(/isis/citation/CBB001562849/)
Thesis
Elaine Rose LaFay;
(2019)
Afflictions of the Tropics' Brink: Medicine, Meteorology, and the Cultivation of Place in the Antebellum Gulf South
(/isis/citation/CBB772500784/)
Article
Putnam, Constance;
(2002)
Fascinated by Fevers: Nathan Smith (1762--1829), Early American Doctor
(/isis/citation/CBB000300519/)
Book
D'Antonio, Patricia;
(2010)
American Nursing: A History of Knowledge, Authority, and the Meaning of Work
(/isis/citation/CBB001020410/)
Book
Furdell, Elizabeth Lane;
(2001)
Royal Doctors, 1485-1714: Medical Personnel at the Tudor and Stuart Courts
(/isis/citation/CBB000102179/)
Thesis
Jentzen, Jeffrey M.;
(2007)
Death Investigation in America: Coroners, Medical Examiners, and the Pursuitof Medical Certainty
(/isis/citation/CBB001560986/)
Book
Anna Greenwood;
Harshad Topiwala;
(2015)
Indian Doctors in Kenya, 1895-1940: The Forgotten History
(/isis/citation/CBB796041613/)
Be the first to comment!