Levy, Jean Elizabeth (Author)
The regulation of scientific advance, and of any subsequent developments in clinical practice, is analysed with particular reference to embryo research and the new techniques of assisted reproduction, which have been available both in the UK and internationally during the last thirty years. The extent to which science and clinical professionals and public opinion have influenced the evolution of the current regulatory framework in the UK is considered. Firstly, the events leading up to the birth of the first IVF baby, the political response and the recourse to public inquiry are described. The deliberations and recommendations of the Committee of Inquiry, against a background of further developments in embryo research and obstetrics are then considered. This is followed by an in depth analysis of the embryo debate during the 1980s, the concurrent scientific and clinical advances, the public and political responses, the increasing and essential involvement of reproductive scientists and clinicians in the debate, and the final emergence in 1990 of facilitative legislation and a Statutory Licensing Authority. Secondly, the success of this statutory authority is considered as it has continued to interpret the requirements of the Embryology Act, satisfy the demands of both the scientific and clinical professions, advise Government over new developments, reassure and accommodate patients, and maintain public confidence in the regulatory framework. The emergence of the network of advisory groups is described and the involvement of these and existing bodies, and reproductive scientists and clinicians, in the interpretation of this framework, is considered with regard to new developments in scientific and clinical practice that have tested the framework and have occasionally rendered it inadequate. In particular, the controversy which surrounded the development of cloning techniques and the necessary legislative changes are described. Finally, conclusions are drawn regarding the significance of these three decades of scientific and clinical developments and the problems inevitably associated with regulating or prohibiting scientific activity both in the UK and internationally. The influence of the clinician, and more particularly the scientist, on this regulation is considered. It is concluded that scientific endeavour may circumvent regulation and that regulation can ultimately only divert and obstruct but not prevent the advance of science. Following on from this conclusion, the future of cloning technology is considered.
...MoreDescription Deals with the political and legal issues leading up to the first IVF baby in Great Britain through the 1990s. Cited in ProQuest Diss. & Thes. : doc. no. C829251.
Book
Sandra Bärnreuther;
(2021)
Substantial Relations: Making Global Reproductive Medicine in Postcolonial India
(/isis/citation/CBB296718154/)
Book
Roberts, Elizabeth F. S.;
(2012)
God's Laboratory: Assisted Reproduction in the Andes
(/isis/citation/CBB001213115/)
Article
Wilson, Duncan;
(2011)
Creating the “Ethics Industry”: Mary Warnock, in vitro Fertilization and the History of Bioethics in Britain
(/isis/citation/CBB001036118/)
Article
Svendsen, Mette N.;
Koch, Lene;
(2008)
Unpacking the “Spare Embryo”: Facilitating Stem Cell Research in a Moral Landscape
(/isis/citation/CBB000953483/)
Thesis
Tovino, Stacey A.;
(2006)
The Visible Brain: Confidentiality and Privacy Implications of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
(/isis/citation/CBB001560896/)
Article
Maurizio Balistreri;
(2018)
La ricerca sugli embrioni umani alla luce dei nuovi scenari riproduttivi: considerazioni sull’individualità dell’embrione e sui limiti alla sperimentazione
(/isis/citation/CBB886964637/)
Thesis
Mignin, Erin N.;
(2012)
Embryonic Policies: Reproductive Technology and Federal Regulation
(/isis/citation/CBB001567404/)
Article
Sarah Franklin;
(2019)
Developmental Landmarks and the Warnock Report: A Sociological Account of Biological Translation
(/isis/citation/CBB966472875/)
Book
Sarah Mellors Rodriguez;
(2022)
Reproductive Realities in Modern China: Birth Control and Abortion, 1911–2021
(/isis/citation/CBB051540922/)
Article
Cowan, Ruth Schwartz;
(2009)
Moving up the Slippery Slope: Mandated Genetic Screening on Cyprus
(/isis/citation/CBB001024128/)
Article
McKeever, Brooke Weberling;
(2013)
News Framing of Autism: Understanding Media Advocacy and the Combating Autism Act
(/isis/citation/CBB001320108/)
Book
Franklin, Sarah;
(2013)
Biological Relatives: IVF, Stem Cells, and the Future of Kinship
(/isis/citation/CBB001422164/)
Article
Bivins, Roberta;
(2013)
Coming “Home” to (post)Colonial Medicine: Treating Tropical Bodies in Post-War Britain
(/isis/citation/CBB001213405/)
Book
Erin Heidt-Forsythe;
(2018)
Between Families and Frankenstein: The Politics of Egg Donation in the United States
(/isis/citation/CBB151853995/)
Article
Johnson, Martin H.;
Franklin, Sarah B.;
Cottingham, Matthew;
Hopwood, Nick;
(2010)
Why the Medical Research Council Refused Robert Edwards and Patrick Steptoe Support for Research on Human Conception in 1971
(/isis/citation/CBB001023689/)
Article
Clarke, Adele E.;
(2007)
Reflections on the Reproductive Sciences in Agriculture in the UK and US, ca. 1900--2000+
(/isis/citation/CBB000701047/)
Book
Banchoff, Thomas F.;
(2011)
Embryo Politics: Ethics and Policy in Atlantic Democracies
(/isis/citation/CBB001212716/)
Book
Sandra P. González-Santos;
(2020)
A portrait of assisted reproduction in Mexico : Scientific, political, and cultural interactions
(/isis/citation/CBB994824851/)
Book
Rene Almeling;
(2020)
GUYnecology: The Missing Science of Men’s Reproductive Health
(/isis/citation/CBB484332667/)
Thesis
Guerrasio, Venetia M.;
(2007)
Dissecting the Pennsylvania Anatomy Act: Laws, Bodies, and Science, 1880--1960
(/isis/citation/CBB001561503/)
Be the first to comment!