Rohde, Joy Elizabeth (Author)
In the late 1950s, Army officials and civilian social scientists joined forces to combat the spread of communism to the so-called 'emerging nations' of Asia, Africa, and Latin America. This fusion of social science and statecraft reached its acme at the Special Operations Research Office (SORO), an interdisciplinary research institute created in 1956 by the Army and American University. For fifteen years, SORO's political scientists, social psychologists, sociologists, and anthropologists worked with Pentagon officials to illuminate the complex social processes involved in the creation of stable, democratic nations. At their most optimistic and messianic, these scholars hoped to replace the violence of war with the peaceful tools of social knowledge. As the Vietnam War intensified in the late 1960s, however, a vocal community of academics lambasted their Army-funded peers as servants of a war-mongering state, forcing SORO's closure in 1969. Rather than severing their close ties to the American state, SORO's experts relocated to a network of Washington think tanks. From there, social scientists continued to influence American national security policy while the authority of their academic counterparts waned. In 1956, social science seemed to promise an end to violence. By 1970, that same social science appeared to many Americans to be a handmaiden of war. The politics and places of social knowledge production shifted radically in the Cold War. This dissertation uses the case of SORO to examine the ways that social scientists and their patrons navigated the fraught relationship between knowledge and politics in the 1950s and 1960s. The contours of that relationship were marked by institutional, intellectual, and ethical ambiguities. In the 1950s and early 1960s, those ambiguities seemed to many scholars to be manageable. As state patronage increasingly appeared to challenge the autonomy and objectivity of science in the late 1960s, academics worked to isolate scholarship from its patrons. But the actions of well-meaning critics remade the relationship between science and the national security state in ways that neither scholars nor government officials intended.
...MoreDescription Focuses on an interdisciplinary research institute, the Special Operations Research Office, which was created in 1956 by the Army and American University Cited in Diss. Abstr. Int. A 68/07 (2008). Pub. no. AAT 3271806.
Book
Greene, Benjamin P.;
(2007)
Eisenhower, Science Advice, and the Nuclear Test-Ban Debate, 1945--1963
(/isis/citation/CBB000741904/)
Book
Farish, Matthew;
(2010)
The Contours of America's Cold War
(/isis/citation/CBB001250904/)
Article
Rohde, Joy;
(2009)
Gray Matters: Social Scientists, Military Patronage, and Democracy in the Cold War
(/isis/citation/CBB001030366/)
Article
Gabrielle Kemmis;
(2020)
Uncovering the Metaphysics of Psychological Warfare: The Social Science Behind the Psychological Strategy Board's Operations Planning, 1951–1953
(/isis/citation/CBB433248952/)
Thesis
Marie Elizabeth Burks;
(2017)
Meditations in an Emergency: Social Scientists and the Problem of Conflict in Cold War America
(/isis/citation/CBB962238632/)
Thesis
Ghosh, Arunabh;
(2014)
Making it Count: Statistics and State-Society Relations in the Early People's Republic of China, 1949--1959
(/isis/citation/CBB001567560/)
Article
Adela Hîncu;
(2022)
Social science and Marxist humanism beyond collectivism in Socialist Romania
(/isis/citation/CBB018717469/)
Article
Emily Baum;
(2021)
Acupuncture Anesthesia on American Bodies: Communism, Race, and the Cold War in the Making of “Legitimate” Medical Science
(/isis/citation/CBB456797600/)
Article
Wang, Zuoyue;
(2010)
Transnational Science during the Cold War: The Case of Chinese/American Scientists
(/isis/citation/CBB000954447/)
Article
Amy Wiese Forbes;
Amanda Smithers;
(2018)
Combatting the ‘Communistic-Mulatto Inspired Movement to Fuse the Two Ethnic Groups’: The Mississippi State Sovereignty Commission, Sickled Cells, and Segregationists’ Science in the Atomic Age
(/isis/citation/CBB004012193/)
Article
Jacobs, Robert A.;
(2010)
Curing the Atomic Bomb Within: The Relationship of American Social Scientists to Nuclear Weapons in the Early Cold War
(/isis/citation/CBB001211593/)
Book
Rohde, Joy;
(2013)
Armed with Expertise: The Militarization of American Social Research during the Cold War
(/isis/citation/CBB001420027/)
Article
Christian Dayé;
(2016)
‘A Fiction of Long Standing’: Techniques of Prospection and the Role of Positivism in US Cold War Social Science, 1950–65
(/isis/citation/CBB357979507/)
Book
Amadae, S. M.;
(2003)
Rationalizing Capitalist Democracy: The Cold War Origins of Rational Choice Liberalism
(/isis/citation/CBB000775232/)
Book
Henry Nielsen;
Kristian Hvidtfeldt Nielsen;
(2021)
Camp Century: The Untold Story of America's Secret Arctic Military Base Under the Greenland Ice
(/isis/citation/CBB637613279/)
Thesis
Benjamin W. Goossen;
(2021)
The Year of the Earth (1957-1958): Cold War Science and the Making of Planetary Consciousness
(/isis/citation/CBB233980968/)
Article
Heymann, Matthias;
Martin-Nielsen, Janet;
(2013)
Introduction: Perspectives on Cold War Science in Small European States
(/isis/citation/CBB001212891/)
Article
Volmar, Axel;
(2013)
Listening to the Cold War: The Nuclear Test Ban Negotiations, Seismology, and Psychoacoustics, 1958--1963
(/isis/citation/CBB001320384/)
Article
Krementsov, Nikolai;
(2007)
In the Shadow of the Bomb: U.S.-Soviet Biomedical Relations in the Early Cold War, 1944--1948
(/isis/citation/CBB001030407/)
Article
Kaiser, David;
(2005)
The Atomic Secret in Red Hands? American Suspicions of Theoretical Physicists during the Early Cold War
(/isis/citation/CBB001021588/)
Be the first to comment!