Emrich, John S. (Author)
People are still debating recombinant DNA today, whether they know it or not. As the technology that gave birth to the biotechnology revolution, recombinant DNA initiated passionate debates from 1971 until 1978 which dealt with issues still central to biotechnology: biohazard safety; scientific freedom and responsibility; the standard of national policy preempting city and state initiatives to ensure the ability to conduct research uniformly around the country; the influence of scientific, business, and environmental lobbying on Congress; and, above all, who should be responsible for the creation, oversight, and enforcement of biotechnology advancements. The years from the initial proposed recombinant DNA experiment in 1971 until the Asilomar Conference in late February 1975 were essential in determining the future of recombinant DNA research and setting the boundaries for the debates between scientists and in the public sphere. Despite the urgency of some scientists to move forward with recombinant DNA research during this period, there were times of little momentum and there certainly was no guaranteed outcome. It was in these essential years that fundamental questions were asked about the nature and safety of scientific inquiry, and where tough decisions were made that broke with the traditions of the scientific establishment and demonstrated an extraordinary degree of social responsibility at a critical moment in the history or molecular biology. The dissertation explores the events that were occurring inside and outside of the laboratory that influenced the debates. These included the dramatic changes in molecular biology, the rise of the environmental social responsibility among scientists, and radical science movements, as well as, the changing role of the scientific and lay press. These essential first years of the debate also created enduring networks that helped shepherd recombinant DNA through a myriad of scientific organizations and governmental agencies, as well as, respond to the criticism by other scientists and the public in the days, months, and years following the 1975 Asilomar Conference, which came to a consensus on the safety of recombinant DNA.
...MoreDescription On the 1970s debate over the control, ethics, and safety of recombinant DNA research. Cited in Diss. Abstr. Int. A 70/07 (2010). Pub. no. AAT 3366568.
Article
Yi, Doogab;
(2008)
Cancer, Viruses, and Mass Migration: Paul Berg's Venture into Eukaryotic Biology and the Advent of Recombinant DNA Research and Technology, 1967--1980
(/isis/citation/CBB000850680/)
Article
Kim, Eun-Sung;
(2008)
Directed Evolution: A Historical Exploration into an Evolutionary Experimental System of Nanobiotechnology, 1965--2006
(/isis/citation/CBB000932240/)
Article
Nagai, Hiroyuki;
Nukaga, Yoshio;
Saeki, Koji;
Akabayashi, Akira;
(2009)
Self-Regulation of Recombinant DNA Technology in Japan in the 1970s
(/isis/citation/CBB000953471/)
Article
Alyssa Botelho;
(2021)
The Insights of Radical Science in the CRISPR Gene-Editing Era: A History of Science for the People and the Cambridge Recombinant DNA Controversy
(/isis/citation/CBB000261857/)
Article
Gisler, Priska;
Kurath, Monika;
(2011)
Paradise Lost? “Science” and “the Public” after Asilomar
(/isis/citation/CBB001250216/)
Book
Bernardino Fantini;
Fabrizio Rufo;
(2017)
Il codice della vita. Una storia della genetica tra scienza e bioetica
(/isis/citation/CBB297801530/)
Book
Schmidt, Markus;
(2009)
Synthetic Biology: The Technoscience and Its Societal Consequences
(/isis/citation/CBB001031780/)
Book
Zylinska, Joanna;
(2009)
Bioethics in the Age of New Media
(/isis/citation/CBB000950307/)
Article
Almeida, Carla;
DalCol, Franciane Lovati;
Massarani, Luisa;
(2013)
Controvérsia científica no telejornalismo brasileiro: um estudo sobre a cobertura das células-tronco no Jornal Nacional
(/isis/citation/CBB001420697/)
Book
O'Doherty, Kieran;
Einsiedel, Edna F;
(2013)
Public Engagement and Emerging Technologies
(/isis/citation/CBB001420078/)
Book
Ong, Aihwa;
Chen, Nancy N.;
(2011)
Asian Biotech: Ethics and Communities of Fate
(/isis/citation/CBB001023125/)
Article
Palladino, Paolo;
(2003)
Life...On Biology, Biography, and Bio-power in the Age of Genetic Engineering
(/isis/citation/CBB000500944/)
Book
Rose, Nikolas S.;
(2007)
Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century
(/isis/citation/CBB000950785/)
Article
Susie Fisher;
(2015)
Not just “a clever way to detect whether DNA really made RNA”: The invention of DNA–RNA hybridization and its outcome
(/isis/citation/CBB180012524/)
Article
Gaudillière, Jean-Paul;
(2009)
New Wine in Old Bottles? The Biotechnology Problem in the History of Molecular Biology
(/isis/citation/CBB000954208/)
Book
Patrick Forterre;
(2016)
Microbes from Hell
(/isis/citation/CBB896878206/)
Article
Cockell, C. S.;
(2004)
The Rights of Microbes
(/isis/citation/CBB000551099/)
Article
Gisler, Priska;
(2009)
Collecting True Blue Blood: A Journey to the Heart of 1960s Biology
(/isis/citation/CBB000932658/)
Article
Morgan, Gregory J.;
(2006)
Why There Was a Useful Plausible Analogy between Geodesic Domes and Spherical Viruses
(/isis/citation/CBB000774682/)
Article
Štrbáňová, Soňa;
(2006)
Continuous Cultivation of Microorganisms: Dissemination of a Method at the Frontiers of Science, Technology and Politics
(/isis/citation/CBB000771793/)
Be the first to comment!