Thesis ID: CBB001560692

Vertebrate Paleontology and the Evolutionary Synthesis, 1894--1944 (2008)

unapi

Paton, Miranda Vierra (Author)


Cornell University
Provine, William B.


Publication Date: 2008
Edition Details: Advisor: Provine, William B.
Physical Details: 833 pp.
Language: English

This is a history of the Evolutionary Synthesis told from the perspective of two American vertebrate paleontologists, Henry Fairfield Osborn and George Gaylord Simpson. It reconsiders the role that paleontologists played in the organization of biology around the project of producing a unified causal theory of evolution. Between 1894 and 1912, Osborn called for unification that resisted methodological reductionism--a growing trend among biologists who privileged only those theoretical claims and research questions that could be explored through experimental means. Osborn aimed his calls for synthesis and theoretical arguments at evolutionists who were becoming increasingly committed to modeling Charles Darwin's Evolution By Natural Selection at its most "microscopic" level, within population-level studies that represented the interaction between random, heritable mutation and selection. Osborn believed that long-term patterns of heritable variation shape evolution in conjunction with natural selection, and objected to the way that biologists rejected his idea for methodological reasons alone. In 1944, George Gaylord Simpson implicitly accepted the series of reductive changes built into maturing population-level models. Simpson linked paleontology to the on-going "Evolutionary Synthesis" by interpreting the fossil record's patterns as products of the evolutionary causes in populations as modeled by geneticists. This history describes the long series of conceptual and methodological changes organized in evolutionary biology between 1894 and 1944. It shows that methodological changes exerted as much effect as did negotiated theoretical agreements and (changing) interpretations of Darwin's theory. It finds that the "Evolutionary Synthesis" of the 1930s and 1940s had two phases: one of methodological consolidation accomplished between 1900 and 1931, and a later phase of theoretical consolidation. The project considers the costs and benefits of agreeing to such a "synthesis," and argues that mid-20 th century agreements produced two lasting problems: a neglect of the process of genetic expression during ontogeny, and the difficulty of explaining selection-driven evolution at all hierarchical levels. It also examines some of the historiographic problems produced by a decision to recognize the unification of biology in terms of theoretical consolidation, or to acknowledge the effects of scientific practice, but to begin either analysis from the standpoint of experimental disciplines.

...More

Description “A history of the Evolutionary Synthesis told from the perspective of two American vertebrate paleontologists, Henry Fairfield Osborn and George Gaylord Simpson.” (from the abstract) Cited in Diss. Abstr. Int. A 69/05 (2008). Pub. no. AAT 3317482.


Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB001560692/

Similar Citations

Book Regal, Brian; (2002)
Henry Fairfield Osborn: Race and the Search for the Origins of Man (/isis/citation/CBB000201525/)

Article David Sepkoski; (2019)
The Unfinished Synthesis?: Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology in the 20th Century (/isis/citation/CBB603354866/)

Article Laporte, Léo F.; (2013)
A Novice's Biography of George Gaylord Simpson (/isis/citation/CBB001212344/)

Article Sommer, Marianne; (2010)
Seriality in the Making: The Osborn-Knight Restorations of Evolutionary History (/isis/citation/CBB001023535/)

Book Laporte, Léo F.; (2000)
George Gaylord Simpson. Paleontologist and Evolutionist (/isis/citation/CBB000100395/)

Article R. Bruce McMillan; (2016)
C. W. Beehler's Collection of Vertebrate Fossils: A Lost Legacy (/isis/citation/CBB008066555/)

Thesis Brinkman, Paul David; (2005)
The Second American Jurassic Dinosaur Rush, 1895--1905 (/isis/citation/CBB001561600/)

Chapter Gliboff, Sander; (2011)
The Golden Age of Lamarckism, 1866--1926 (/isis/citation/CBB001500084/)

Article Lynn K. Nyhart; Scott Lidgard; (2021)
Revisiting George Gaylord Simpson’s “The Role of the Individual in Evolution” (1941) (/isis/citation/CBB846703326/)

Article Katherine McLeod; (2022)
The Call of the Hoatzin: Ecology, Evolution, and Eugenics at the Bronx Zoo (/isis/citation/CBB199228100/)

Article David Ceccarelli; (2021)
Theistic evolution and evolutionary ethics: Henry Fairfield Osborn and Huxley’s legacy (/isis/citation/CBB339183866/)

Article Xiaobo Yu; (2017)
Chinese paleontology and the reception of Darwinism in early twentieth century (/isis/citation/CBB864767954/)

Book Aczel, Amir D.; (2007)
Jesuit and the Skull: Teilhard de Chardin, Evolution and the Search for Peking Man (/isis/citation/CBB000830479/)

Authors & Contributors
Ceccarelli, David
Sommer, Marianne
Laporte, Léo F.
Katherine McLeod
Yu, Xiaobo
Gliboff, Sander
Concepts
Evolution
Paleontology
Dinosaurs
Scientific communities; interprofessional relations
Biology
Biographies
Time Periods
20th century, early
20th century
19th century
Places
United States
China
New York City (New York, U.S.)
Argentina
Russia
Mongolia
Institutions
American Museum of Natural History, New York
The Bronx Zoo (New York, NY)
Field Museum of Natural History
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment