IsisCB Explore

Thesis ID: CBB001560692

Vertebrate Paleontology and the Evolutionary Synthesis, 1894--1944 (2008)

Paton, Miranda Vierra (Author)

Cornell University
Provine, William B.

Publication Date: 2008
Edition Details: Advisor: Provine, William B.
Physical Details: 833 pp.
Language: English

Outside Links

Academia.edu

Evolution Paleontology Vertebrate zoology 20th century, early Osborn, Henry Fairfield Simpson, George Gaylord

This is a history of the Evolutionary Synthesis told from the perspective of two American vertebrate paleontologists, Henry Fairfield Osborn and George Gaylord Simpson. It reconsiders the role that paleontologists played in the organization of biology around the project of producing a unified causal theory of evolution. Between 1894 and 1912, Osborn called for unification that resisted methodological reductionism--a growing trend among biologists who privileged only those theoretical claims and research questions that could be explored through experimental means. Osborn aimed his calls for synthesis and theoretical arguments at evolutionists who were becoming increasingly committed to modeling Charles Darwin's Evolution By Natural Selection at its most "microscopic" level, within population-level studies that represented the interaction between random, heritable mutation and selection. Osborn believed that long-term patterns of heritable variation shape evolution in conjunction with natural selection, and objected to the way that biologists rejected his idea for methodological reasons alone. In 1944, George Gaylord Simpson implicitly accepted the series of reductive changes built into maturing population-level models. Simpson linked paleontology to the on-going "Evolutionary Synthesis" by interpreting the fossil record's patterns as products of the evolutionary causes in populations as modeled by geneticists. This history describes the long series of conceptual and methodological changes organized in evolutionary biology between 1894 and 1944. It shows that methodological changes exerted as much effect as did negotiated theoretical agreements and (changing) interpretations of Darwin's theory. It finds that the "Evolutionary Synthesis" of the 1930s and 1940s had two phases: one of methodological consolidation accomplished between 1900 and 1931, and a later phase of theoretical consolidation. The project considers the costs and benefits of agreeing to such a "synthesis," and argues that mid-20 th century agreements produced two lasting problems: a neglect of the process of genetic expression during ontogeny, and the difficulty of explaining selection-driven evolution at all hierarchical levels. It also examines some of the historiographic problems produced by a decision to recognize the unification of biology in terms of theoretical consolidation, or to acknowledge the effects of scientific practice, but to begin either analysis from the standpoint of experimental disciplines.

...More

Description “A history of the Evolutionary Synthesis told from the perspective of two American vertebrate paleontologists, Henry Fairfield Osborn and George Gaylord Simpson.” (from the abstract) Cited in Diss. Abstr. Int. A 69/05 (2008). Pub. no. AAT 3317482.

Citation URI

https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB001560692/

Citations Indexes

Similar Citations

Article David Ceccarelli; (2021)
“The bad habit of wandering”: Morgan, Osborn and the issue of evolutionary causality in genetics and paleontology

Book Regal, Brian; (2002)
Henry Fairfield Osborn: Race and the Search for the Origins of Man

Article Cain, Joe; (2002)
Epistemic and Community Transition in American Evolutionary Studies: The “Committee on Common Problems of Genetics, Paleontology, and Systematics” (1942--1949)

Article Irina Podgorny; (2017)
Manifest ambiguity: Intermediate forms, variation, and mammal paleontology in Argentina, 1830–1880

Article Sommer, Marianne; (2010)
Seriality in the Making: The Osborn-Knight Restorations of Evolutionary History

Article David Sepkoski; (2019)
The Unfinished Synthesis?: Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology in the 20th Century

Article Laporte, Léo F.; (2013)
A Novice's Biography of George Gaylord Simpson

Book Laporte, Léo F.; (2000)
George Gaylord Simpson. Paleontologist and Evolutionist

Article R. Bruce McMillan; (2016)
C. W. Beehler's Collection of Vertebrate Fossils: A Lost Legacy

Article Manias, Chris; (2015)
Building Baluchitherium and Indricotherium: Imperial and International Networks in Early-Twentieth Century Paleontology

Thesis Brinkman, Paul David; (2005)
The Second American Jurassic Dinosaur Rush, 1895--1905

Chapter Gliboff, Sander; (2011)
The Golden Age of Lamarckism, 1866--1926

Article Katherine McLeod; (2022)
The Call of the Hoatzin: Ecology, Evolution, and Eugenics at the Bronx Zoo

Article David Ceccarelli; (2021)
Theistic evolution and evolutionary ethics: Henry Fairfield Osborn and Huxley’s legacy

Article Homchick, Julie; (2010)
Objects and Objectivity: The Evolution Controversy at the American Museum of Natural History, 1915--1928

Article Sommer, Marianne; (2007)
The Lost World as Laboratory: The Politics of Evolution between Science and Fiction in the Early Decades of Twentieth-Century America

Article Lynn K. Nyhart; Scott Lidgard; (2021)
Revisiting George Gaylord Simpson’s “The Role of the Individual in Evolution” (1941)

Article Karl, Hans-Volker; Tichy, Gottfried; (2004)
Zur frühen Geschichte der Paläocheloniologie von Schaumburg-Lippe: Die Rolle des Gymnasial-Professors Max Ballerstedt in der Naturwissenschaft

Article McMillan, R. Bruce; (2010)
The Discovery of Fossil Vertebrates on Missouri's Western Frontier

Article Grigorescu, Dan; (2003)
Vertebrate Paleontology in Romania

Comments

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}