Thesis ID: CBB001560657

Manuscript Technologies: Correspondence, Collaboration, and the Construction of Natural Knowledge in Early Modern Britain (2008)

unapi

Yale, Elizabeth E. (Author)


Harvard University


Publication Date: 2008
Physical Details: 316 pp.
Language: English

This dissertation examines scientific communication and collaboration in seventeenth-century Britain. More precisely, it analyzes the ways in which these activities were carried out through the production and exchange of scribal texts by individuals active in the allied (and often overlapping) fields of natural history and antiquarian studies. In these fields, manuscript exchange was naturalists' primary means of constructing knowledge. Textual practices--such as reading, writing, annotating and sending letters--were as vital to the creation of scientific knowledge as observing, calculating, and experimenting. Although printed books were often the end products of research in these fields, these books grew out of long processes of exchange and collaboration. Scribal exchange occurred within what natural historians and antiquarians referred to as their "correspondence," the sum of the social, material, and intellectual links between naturalists and antiquarians. Through the correspondence, naturalists pursued ambitious goals, such as surveys of all known plants and animals and detailed local histories of nature and antiquities. They exchanged not only scribal texts, such as letters, notes, marginalia, and manuscript books, but also natural specimens (plants, insects, stones) and printed books. These exchanges had many permutations; the "value" of a given natural specimen, fact, or book was determined by what another naturalist voluntarily exchanged for it. At times, the voluntary nature of manuscript exchange thwarted collaborative efforts, frustrating, for example, large-scale projects like the production of encyclopedic natural histories of every county in Britain. Naturalists developed a "manuscript sensibility," one that encouraged endless revision, addition, and accretion even in the writing of texts destined for print. This sensibility was the product of both naturalists' working methods-- the accumulation and exchange of "facts" through the correspondence--and naturalists' epistemological priorities, inspired by the natural philosopher Francis Bacon, which generated the preference for facts. These two factors, the one material, the other abstract and philosophical, were two sides of the same coin. Scientific priorities conditioned naturalists' use of available means of communication, but the potentialities of these various means also determined the realization of scientific priorities. Rather than one being the product of the other, the two were mutually co-constructed.

...More

Description “Examines scientific communication and collaboration in seventeenth-century Britain.” (from the abstract) Cited in Diss. Abstr. Int. A 69/04 (2008). Pub. no. AAT 3312577.


Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB001560657/

Similar Citations

Book Fox, Robert; Joly, Bernard; (2010)
Echanges franco-britanniques entre savants depuis le XVIIe siècle (/isis/citation/CBB001033277/)

Article Yale, Elizabeth; (2011)
Marginalia, Commonplaces, and Correspondence: Scribal Exchange in Early Modern Science (/isis/citation/CBB001024005/)

Article Pugliano, Valentina; (2012)
Specimen Lists: Artisanal Writing or Natural Historical Paperwork? (/isis/citation/CBB001252382/)

Book Chantal Grell; (2014)
Correspondance de Johannes Hevelius.Volume 1: Prolégomènes critiques (/isis/citation/CBB265925939/)

Chapter Rhodri Lewis; Anna Marie Roos; Gideon Manning; (2023)
Whose Manner of Discourse? Sir William Petty, Civility, and the Early Royal Society (/isis/citation/CBB813427283/)

Book Hans Bots; (2018)
De Republiek der Letteren: De Europese intellectuele wereld 1500-1760 (/isis/citation/CBB866470916/)

Book Nicole Howard; (2022)
Loath to Print: The Reluctant Scientific Author, 1500–1750 (/isis/citation/CBB894126119/)

Article Attie, Katherine Bootle; (2013)
Selling Science: Bacon, Harvey and the Commodification of Knowledge (/isis/citation/CBB001320085/)

Book Elizabeth Yale; (2016)
Sociable Knowledge: Natural History and the Nation in Early Modern Britain (/isis/citation/CBB831137700/)

Chapter Boschiero, Luciano; (2009)
Networking and Experimental Rhetoric in Florence, Bologna and London during the 1660s (/isis/citation/CBB001020802/)

Article Paul White; (2022)
The Many Lives of Darwin’s Letters (/isis/citation/CBB415627399/)

Article Frost-Arnold, Karen; (2013)
Moral Trust and Scientific Collaboration (/isis/citation/CBB001320259/)

Article Pardo Teijeiro, Xosé Francisco; Alvarez Lires, Mercedes; (2010)
La presencia de Bibiano F. Osorio-Tafall en la revista Ciencia (/isis/citation/CBB001033799/)

Article Vermeulen, Niki; Parker, John N.; Penders, Bart; (2013)
Understanding Life Together: A Brief History of Collaboration in Biology (/isis/citation/CBB001320293/)

Book Brynley F. Roberts; (2022)
Edward Lhwyd: c.1660-1709, Naturalist, Antiquary, Philologist (/isis/citation/CBB568638637/)

Article Vanderstraeten, Raf; (2011)
Scholarly Communication in Education Journals (/isis/citation/CBB001231852/)

Book Beeley, Philip; Scriba, Christoph J.; (2012)
Correspondence of John Wallis (1616--1703). Vol. III, October 1668--December 1673 (/isis/citation/CBB001200116/)

Book Clifford Cunningham; (2015)
Discovery of the First Asteroid, Ceres (/isis/citation/CBB814771092/)

Authors & Contributors
Yale, Elizabeth E.
Grell, Chantal
White, Paul S.
Vermeulen, Niki
Vanderstraeten, Raf
Scriba, Christoph J.
Concepts
Communication within scientific contexts
Scientific communities; interprofessional relations
Correspondence and corresponding
Scientists
Natural history
Scientific literature
Time Periods
17th century
Early modern
18th century
20th century
16th century
Modern
Places
Great Britain
Netherlands
England
Italy
France
United Kingdom
Institutions
Royal Society of London
Oxford Botanic Garden
Census of Marine Life (1999-2009)
Oxford University
Human Genome Project
Ashmolean Museum, Oxford
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment