Berman, Elizabeth Popp (Author)
This dissertation explains how and why academic science in the U.S., which was historically shielded from the market economy, became closely and explicitly tied to it. Using historical methods, including primary and secondary research, archival work, and interviews, it shows how three new market-oriented institutions were introduced and gradually took hold: (1) the university- industry research center, (2) the patenting and licensing of academic research, and (3) entrepreneurship in the biological sciences. The dissertation uses a two-fold comparative strategy. First, to understand what caused these practices, it evaluates the relative roles of universities, industry, and government in their creation and promotion. Second, to understand how institutions move toward the marketplace more generally, it compares the practices' three different paths to institutionalization. The dissertation's main finding is that the primary cause of this shift was not corporate needs, university budget cuts, or new opportunities to make money. Instead, I show that government provided the biggest push of academic science toward the market. In the late 1960s and early 1970s, several different groups began promoting a variety of unrelated government policies, each for its own reasons, but none had great success at implementing its proposals. During the 1970s, the U.S. experienced an extended period of economic stagnation, which led to a widespread argument that its economic problems were being caused by an "innovation gap" with countries like Japan. This led to a moment of political opportunity for policies that could be presented as a solution to this gap. In each of these cases, supporters took advantage of this opening to successfully reframe their projects as connecting technological innovation with economic growth. By the mid-1980s new government policies had helped to institutionalize each of these practices. Equally important, the arguments behind the policy changes-- that academic science could act as an economic engine--had introduced a new market-oriented logic into the university. The study demonstrates how a market logic can come to dominate an institution even without a concerted effort to promote it. This has implications for our understanding of other social institutions being transformed by the market.
...MoreDescription “Explains how and why academic science in the U.S., which was historically shielded from the market economy, became closely and explicitly tied to it.” (from the abstract) Cited in Diss. Abstr. Int. A 68/08 (2008). Pub. no. AAT 3275345.
Book
Mirowski, Philip;
(2011)
Science-Mart: Privatizing American Science
(/isis/citation/CBB001210019/)
Article
Frank N. Laird;
(2020)
Sticky Policies, Dysfunctional Systems: Path Dependency and the Problems of Government Funding for Science in the United States
(/isis/citation/CBB444679505/)
Book
Berman, Elizabeth Popp;
(2012)
Creating the Market University: How Academic Science Became an Economic Engine
(/isis/citation/CBB001201809/)
Thesis
Benjamin W. Goossen;
(2021)
The Year of the Earth (1957-1958): Cold War Science and the Making of Planetary Consciousness
(/isis/citation/CBB233980968/)
Article
Welsh, Rick;
Glenna, Leland;
(2006)
Considering the Role of the University in Conducting Research on Agri-biotechnologies
(/isis/citation/CBB000780215/)
Article
Geiger, Roger L.;
Sá, Creso;
(2005)
Beyond Technology Transfer: US State Policies to Harness University Research for Economic Development
(/isis/citation/CBB000700979/)
Book
Hughes, Sally Smith;
(2011)
Genentech: The Beginnings of Biotech
(/isis/citation/CBB001221219/)
Thesis
Lucas, Matthew James William;
(2006)
Bridging a Cultural Divide: Strengthening Similarities and Managing Differences in University-Industry Relationships
(/isis/citation/CBB001560530/)
Article
Eisler, Matthew N.;
(2013)
“The Ennobling Unity of Science and Technology”: Materials Sciences and Engineering, the Department of Energy, and the Nanotechnology Enigma
(/isis/citation/CBB001420869/)
Article
Longo, Bernadette;
(2008)
Mathematics, Computer Development, and Science Policy Debates after World War II
(/isis/citation/CBB000850272/)
Chapter
Pogliano, Claudio;
(2001)
Images and Practice of Science in Post-War Italy
(/isis/citation/CBB000102132/)
Article
Bodnarczuk, Mark;
Hoddeson, Lillian;
(2008)
Megascience in Particle Physics: The Birth of an Experiment String at Fermilab
(/isis/citation/CBB000950434/)
Article
Berman, Elizabeth Popp;
(2008)
Why Did Universities Start Patenting? Institution-Building and the Road to the Bayh-Dole Act
(/isis/citation/CBB000953521/)
Article
Benum, Edgeir;
(2007)
Making Research Count: Norway and the OECD Connection, 1965--1980
(/isis/citation/CBB000850325/)
Book
Vest, Charles M.;
(2007)
The American Research University from World War II to World Wide Web: Governments, the Private Sector, and the Emerging Meta-University
(/isis/citation/CBB000741889/)
Book
Greenberg, Daniel S.;
(2007)
Science for Sale: The Perils, Rewards, and Delusions of Campus Capitalism
(/isis/citation/CBB000820137/)
Article
Mody, Cyrus C. M.;
Nelson, Andrew J.;
(2013)
“A Towering Virtue of Necessity”: Interdisciplinarity and the Rise of Computer Music at Vietnam-Era Stanford
(/isis/citation/CBB001320392/)
Article
Solovey, Mark;
(2012)
Senator Fred Harris's National Social Science Foundation Proposal: Reconsidering Federal Science Policy, Natural Science--Social Science Relations, and American Liberalism during the 1960s
(/isis/citation/CBB001231876/)
Thesis
Ian J. Varga;
(2022)
Reviving the Search for Life: Astrobiology, NASA, and the Politics of Science in the Late Twentieth-Century United States
(/isis/citation/CBB684396859/)
Book
Martini, Edwin A.;
(2012)
Agent Orange: History, Science, and the Politics of Uncertainty
(/isis/citation/CBB001320939/)
Be the first to comment!