Bai, Tongdong (Author)
Boston University
Stachel, John
Edition Details: Advisor: Stachel, John
Physical Details: 397 pp.
Language: English
This dissertation is an attempt to defend two founders of quantum theories, Niels Bohr and Wolfgang Pauli, against various anti-realist readings. These readings claim that Bohr's and Pauli's interpretations of quantum mechanics are based on a denial of the reality of the external world, and that their debates with Albert Einstein are over realism. But I argue that the differences between their views and Einstein's are neither about the reality of the external world, nor about the reality of theoretical entities in general. Rather, the differences are about the reality of this or that particular theoretical entity and the viability of this or that particular idea of physics. Although in 1972 Clifford Hooker gave an adequate and then-comprehensive discussion of Bohr's ideas countering anti-realist readings, his work has been forgotten by a new generation of interpreters such as Arthur Fine and Mara Beller who read anti-realism into Bohr's ideas. One aim of this dissertation is to revive Hooker's defense of Bohr and to counter such misreadings. A second contribution this dissertation makes consists in an elaboration of Pauli's views. Pauli wrote extensively on many philosophical issues, and made important contributions to the debates between Einstein, Bohr and himself. However, his views are unfairly ignored by most philosophers of quantum mechanics, and when considered, are at best quickly dismissed as anti-realist. In my dissertation, I discuss Pauli's rich ideas on physics and philosophy and show that Pauli is not an anti-realist. In particular, Bohr's and Pauli's views on a problem introduced in a paper by Einstein, Boris Podolsky, and Nathan Rosen (the EPR paper) are discussed in detail. The close examination of Bohr's and Pauli's views also shows that there are significant differences between them, suggesting the inadequacy of the generic term the Copenhagen school, often used to refer indiscriminately to their views. Through my studies of Bohr's and Pauli's ideas, I hope to show the inadequacy of using metaphysical doctrines such as realism and anti- realism to gain either a full understanding of general problems in physics, or an understanding of the ideas of these working physicists in particular.
...MoreDescription “This dissertation is an attempt to defend two founders of quantum theories, Niels Bohr and Wolfgang Pauli, against various anti-realist readings.” (from the abstract) Cited in Diss. Abstr. Int. A 64 (2004): 2921. UMI order no. 3101066.
Similar Citations
Article
Morrison, Margaret;
(2007)
Spin: All Is Not What It Seems
(/isis/citation/CBB000701045/)
Article
Shomar, Towfic;
(2008)
Bohr as a Phenomenological Realist
(/isis/citation/CBB001230072/)
Thesis
Djupsjobacka, Stefan Andreas;
(2005)
Dialogue in the Crisis of Representation: Realism and Antirealism in theContext of the Conversation between Theologians and Quantum Physicists inGoettingen, 1949--1961
(/isis/citation/CBB001561651/)
Article
Hilgevoord, Jan;
(2005)
Time in Quantum Mechanics: A Story of Confusion
(/isis/citation/CBB000501568/)
Book
Pietro Greco;
(2020)
Quanti. La straordinaria storia della meccanica quantistica
(/isis/citation/CBB247197978/)
Book
Federico Laudisa;
(2023)
Dalla fisica alla filosofia naturale : Niels Bohr e la cultura scientifica del Novecento
(/isis/citation/CBB968309483/)
Thesis
Lee, Jeongmin;
(2006)
Bohr vs. Bohm: Interpreting Quantum Theory through the Philosophical Tradition
(/isis/citation/CBB001561463/)
Book
Hendry, John;
(1984)
The creation of quantum mechanics and the Bohr-Pauli dialogue
(/isis/citation/CBB000004707/)
Article
Jean-Philippe Martinez;
(2019)
Beyond Ideology: Epistemological Foundations of Vladimir Fock's approach to Quantum Theory
(/isis/citation/CBB957810528/)
Thesis
Pashley, Roberta;
(2009)
Jung's Metapsychology and the Contribution of Pauli's Quantum Philosophy to Its Development
(/isis/citation/CBB001561149/)
Article
Massimi, Michela;
Redhead, Michael;
(2003)
Weinberg's Proof of the Spin-Statistics Theorem
(/isis/citation/CBB000340865/)
Thesis
Tanona, Scott Daniel;
(2002)
From Correspondence to Complementarity: The Emergence of Bøhr's Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics
(/isis/citation/CBB001562244/)
Book
Kumar, Manjit;
(2010)
Quantum: Einstein, Bohr, and the Great Debate about the Nature of Reality
(/isis/citation/CBB001033184/)
Chapter
Dolling, Lisa M.;
(2008)
Practical Arrangements and Fictitious Use: Bohr's Photon Box
(/isis/citation/CBB000953880/)
Thesis
Diamond, Ethel;
(2006)
The Role of Philosophy in the Conceptual Development of Quantum Physics
(/isis/citation/CBB001560852/)
Article
Alexander Pechenkin;
(2021)
The Ensemble Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics and Scientific Realism
(/isis/citation/CBB613319171/)
Book
Malin, Shimon;
(2001)
Nature Loves to Hide: Quantum Physics and the Nature of Reality, a Western Perspective
(/isis/citation/CBB000100262/)
Book
Jennifer Burwell;
(2018)
Quantum Language and the Migration of Scientific Concepts
(/isis/citation/CBB682085795/)
Article
Konno, Hiroyuki;
(2000)
Bohr's Search for the Quantum Theory of Dispersion--The Number of Dispersion Electrons, Absorption and Emission of Light and the Oscillator Model
(/isis/citation/CBB000102486/)
Thesis
Shimek, Suzanne Elizabeth;
(2001)
In Uncertain Terms: Poetry, Physics, and Representation in the Quantum Era
(/isis/citation/CBB001560591/)
Journal for General Philosophy of Science
Historia Scientiarum: International Journal of the History of Science Society of Japan
Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte
Acta Baltica historiae et philosophiae scientiarum
Be the first to comment!