Agassi, Joseph (Author)
This volume examines Popper’s philosophy by analyzing the criticism of his most popular critics: Thomas Kuhn, Paul Feyerabend and Imre Lakatos. They all followed his rejection of the traditional view of science as inductive. Starting from the assumption that Hume’s criticism of induction is valid, the book explores the central criticism and objections that these three critics have raised. Their objections have met with great success, are significant and deserve paraphrase. One also may consider them reasonable protests against Popper’s high standards rather than fundamental criticisms of his philosophy. The book starts out with a preliminary discussion of some central background material and essentials of Popper’s philosophy. It ends with nutshell representations of the philosophies of Popper. Kuhn, Feyerabend and Lakatos. The middle section of the book presents the connection between these philosophers and explains what their central ideas consists of, what the critical arguments are, how they presented them, and how valid they are. In the process, the author claims that Popper's popular critics used against him arguments that he had invented (and answered) without saying so. They differ from him mainly in that they demanded of all criticism that it should be constructive: do not stop believing a refuted theory unless there is a better alternative to it. Popper hardly ever discussed belief, delegating its study to psychology proper; he usually discussed only objective knowledge, knowledge that is public and thus open to public scrutiny.
...MoreEssay Review Steven William Clarke (2016) Popper and His Critics Revisited. Science and Education (pp. 221-227).
Essay Review
Steven William Clarke;
(2016)
Popper and His Critics Revisited
Book
Matteo Collodel;
Eric Oberheim;
(2020)
Feyerabend’s Formative Years. Volume 1. Feyerabend and Popper: Correspondence and Unpublished Papers
Book
Nola, Robert;
Sankey, Howard;
(2000)
After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend: Recent Issues in Theories of Scientific Method
Book
Francesco Coniglione;
(2025)
Lontano da Popper. L'epistemologia post-positivista e le metamorfosi della razionalità scientifica
Chapter
Nye, Mary Jo;
(2010)
Science and Politics in the Philosophy of Science: Popper, Kuhn, and Polanyi
Article
Jamie Shaw;
(2020)
The Problem of the Empirical Basis in the Popperian Tradition: Popper, Bartley, and Feyerabend
Article
Weber, Marcel;
(2002)
Incommensurability and Theory Comparison in Experimental Biology
Article
Marij van Strien;
(2020)
Pluralism and anarchism in quantum physics: Paul Feyerabend's writings on quantum physics in relation to his general philosophy of science
Book
Matteo Collodel;
Eric Oberheim;
(2024)
Feyerabend’s Formative Years. Volume 2. Feyerabend on Logical Empiricism, Bohm & Kuhn: Correspondence and Unpublished Papers
Article
Ronald N. Giere;
(2016)
Feyerabend's Perspectivism
Article
John Preston;
(2016)
The Rise of Western Rationalism: Paul Feyerabend's Story
Article
Luca Tambolo;
(2015)
A Tale of Three Theories: Feyerabend and Popper on Progress and the Aim of Science
Article
Matteo Collodel;
(2016)
Was Feyerabend a Popperian? Methodological Issues in the History of the Philosophy of Science
Article
Parvin, Phil;
(2011)
The Rationalist Tradition and the Problem of Induction: Karl Popper's Rejection of Epistemological Optimism
Article
Chris Walker;
(2019)
Karl Jaspers and Karl Popper: the shared legacy
Article
Sara Bianchini;
(2014)
Montaigne e Popper. L'induzione e la scienza
Article
Díez, José A.;
(2011)
On Popper's Strong Inductivism (or Strongly Inconsistent Anti-Inductivism)
Article
Eric Oberheim;
(2016)
Rediscovering Einstein's Legacy: How Einstein Anticipates Kuhn and Feyerabend on the Nature of Science
Book
Lube, Manfred;
(2005)
Karl R. Popper Bibliographie, 1925--2004: Wissenschaftstheorie, Sozialphilosophie, Logik, Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie, Naturwissenschaften
Essay Review
Grattan-Guinness, I.;
(2002)
Truths and Contradictions about Karl Popper
Be the first to comment!