Dissatisfaction with hasty philosophical generalizations from a small number of conveniently chosen case-studies has contributed significantly to a widespread disillusionment with the whole enterprise of integrated history and philosophy of science. The history-philosophy relationship should be seen as one between the concrete and the abstract, not between the particular and the general. An abstract framework is necessary for telling any concrete stories at all. If historians do not find appropriate philosophical concepts with which to frame their episodes, then they ought to create fresh ones. Thus history-writing can serve an effective method of generating new philosophical insights. I illustrate these claims with two episodes from my own recent work. First, an inability to make sense of the original development of thermometry led me to craft a new philosophical framework of “epistemic iteration”, which involves accepting an unjustified starting-point for a process of self-correction and refinement. Second, a puzzle about the apparently insufficient reasons for the switch to Lavoisier’s new paradigm resulted in a move to a more commodious philosophical framework of analysis, in which theory-choice is understood as a pluralistic process of interaction between systems of scientific practice.
...MoreBook Mauskopf, Seymour; Schmaltz, Tad (2012) Integrating History and Philosophy of Science: Problems and Prospects.
Similar Citations
Chapter
Arabatzis, Theodore;
(2012)
Hidden Entities and Experimental Practice: Renewing the Dialogue Between History and Philosophy of Science
Article
Ash, Mitchell G.;
(2012)
Wissenschaftsgeschichte und Wissenschaftsphilosophie -- Einführende Bemerkungen
Article
Kaiser, David;
(2012)
In Retrospect: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Article
Powers, John C.;
(2014)
Measuring Fire: Herman Boerhaave and the Introduction of Thermometry into Chemistry
Article
Larry Laudan;
Rachel Laudan;
(2016)
The Re-Emergence of Hyphenated History-and-Philosophy-of-Science and the Testing of Theories of Scientific Change
Chapter
Massimo Ferrari;
(2015)
Ernst Cassirer and the History of Science
Essay Review
Velasco, Joel D.;
(2012)
The Wide Scope of Philosophy of Biology
Chapter
Sturm, Thomas;
Gigerenzer, Gerd;
(2006)
How Can We Use the Distinction between Discovery and Justification? On Weaknesses of the Strong Programme in Sociology of Science
Article
Stump, David J.;
(2009)
Pragmatism, Activism, and the Icy Slopes of Logic in George Reisch's Portrait of the Philosophy of Science as a Young Field
Essay Review
Sankey, Howard;
(2014)
Revisiting Structure
Article
Buntebarth, Günter;
(2002)
Temperature Measurements Below the Earth's Surface: A History of Records
Article
John P. McCaskey;
(2020)
History of ‘Temperature’: Maturation of a Measurement Concept
Book
Avramov, Iordan;
Hunter, Michael;
Yoshimoto, Hideyuki;
(2010)
Boyle's Books: The Evidence of His Citations
Article
Boantza, Victor;
(2008)
The Phlogistic Role of Heat in the Chemical Revolution and the Origins of Kirwan's “Ingenious Modifications...Into the Theory of Phlogiston”
Article
Akeroyd, Michael;
(2003)
The Lavoisier-Kirwan Debate and Approaches to the Evaluation of Theories
Article
Bandinelli, Angella;
(2003)
1783---Lavoisier and Laplace: Another Crucial Year. Antiphlogistic Chemistry and the Investigation on Living Beings between the Eighteenth and the Ninenteenth Centuries
Article
Guerra, Andreia;
Braga, Marco;
Reis, José Claudio;
(2013)
History, Philosophy, and Science in a Social Perspective: A Pedagogical Project
Chapter
Miller, David Marshall;
(2012)
The History and Philosophy of Science History
Article
Pyenson, Lewis;
(2008)
Forward Into the Past
Article
Drees, Willem B.;
(2013)
Rich Religion and Science: Asian Religions, Ian Barbour, and Much Else
Metascience: An International Review Journal for the History, Philosophy and Social Studies of Science
Science and Education
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte
Be the first to comment!