This chapter presents three important reasons why evolutionary biologists dismissed Lamarckism or soft inheritance from the Modern Synthesis. The first is the legacy of adhering to August Weismann's ideas of the separation of germ line and soma. The second is the absence, from the 1920s through the 1940s, of convincing for strong evidence for the inheritance of acquired characteristics. The third reason came from the assumptions of population and quantitative genetics, which were developing at the time.
...MoreBook Gissis, Snait B.; Jablonka, Eva (2011) Transformations of Lamarckism: From Subtle Fluids to Molecular Biology.
Chapter
Gissis, Snait B.;
Jablonka, Eva;
(2011)
The Exclusion of Soft (“Lamarckian”) Inheritance from the Modern Synthesis
(/isis/citation/CBB001500089/)
Article
Alan Grafen;
(2019)
Should we ask for more than consistency of Darwinism with Mendelism?
(/isis/citation/CBB453166142/)
Thesis
Green, Lisa Anne;
(2012)
Science for Survival: The Modern Synthesis of Evolution and the Biological Sciences Curriculum Study
(/isis/citation/CBB001567386/)
Article
Jean Gayon;
Richard M. Burian;
Laurent Loison;
(2017)
The Contributions – and Collapse – of Lamarckian Heredity in Pasteurian Molecular Biology: 1. Lysogeny, 1900–1960
(/isis/citation/CBB496049162/)
Article
Levit, Georgy S.;
Hossfeld, Uwe;
Olsson, Lennart;
(2014)
The Darwinian Revolution in Germany: From Evolutionary Morphology to the Modern Synthesis
(/isis/citation/CBB001500033/)
Article
deJong-Lambert, William;
Krementsov, Nikolai;
(2012)
On Labels and Issues: The Lysenko Controversy and the Cold War
(/isis/citation/CBB001250824/)
Article
Smit, Harry;
(2010)
Weismann, Wittgenstein and the Homunculus Fallacy
(/isis/citation/CBB001023966/)
Article
Emily Herring;
(2018)
‘Great is Darwin and Bergson His Poet’: Julian Huxley's Other Evolutionary Synthesis
(/isis/citation/CBB246935870/)
Chapter
Lamb, Marion J.;
(2011)
Attitudes to Soft Inheritance in Great Britain, 1930s-1970s
(/isis/citation/CBB001500090/)
Book
Loison, Laurent;
Morange, Michel;
(2010)
Qu'est-ce que le néolamarckisme? Les biologistes français et la question de l'évolution des espèces: 1870--1940
(/isis/citation/CBB001231944/)
Article
Alexis De Tiège;
Yves Van de Peer;
Johan Braeckman;
Koen B. Tanghe;
(2017)
The Sociobiology of Genes: The Gene’s Eye View as a Unifying Behavioural-Ecological Framework for Biological Evolution
(/isis/citation/CBB257883841/)
Article
Jonathan B. L. Bard;
(2017)
C.H. Waddington’s Differences with the Creators of the Modern Evolutionary Synthesis: A Tale of Two Genes
(/isis/citation/CBB562199563/)
Article
Erik L. Peterson;
(2017)
‘So Far Like the Present Period’: A Reply to ‘C.H. Waddington’s Differences with the Creators of the Modern Evolutionary Synthesis: A Tale of Two Genes’
(/isis/citation/CBB382932086/)
Article
Churchill, Frederick B.;
(2010)
August Weismann Embraces the Protozoa
(/isis/citation/CBB001022396/)
Book
Weismann, August;
Churchill, Frederick B.;
Risler, Helmut;
(1999)
August Weismann: Selected Letters and Documents
(/isis/citation/CBB000111754/)
Article
Abrams, Marshall;
(2006)
Infinite Populations and Counterfactual Frequencies in Evolutionary Theory
(/isis/citation/CBB000770725/)
Book
Grant Ramsey;
Charles H. Pence;
(2016)
Chance in Evolution
(/isis/citation/CBB545855239/)
Article
Yoichi Ishida;
(2017)
Sewall Wright, shifting balance theory, and the hardening of the modern synthesis
(/isis/citation/CBB492038485/)
Article
Dröscher, Ariane;
(2015)
Of Germ-Plasm and Zymoplasm: August Weismann, Carlo Emery and the Debate about the Transmission of Acquired Characteristics
(/isis/citation/CBB001510263/)
Article
Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg;
(2008)
Heredity and Its Entities around 1900
(/isis/citation/CBB000931145/)
Be the first to comment!