When non-Euclidean geometry was developed in the nineteenth century, both scientists and philosophers addressed the question as to whether the Kantian theory of space ought to be refurbished or even rejected. The possibility of considering a variety of hypotheses regarding physical space appeared to contradict Kant's supposition of Euclid's geometry as a priori knowledge and suggested the view that the geometry of space is a matter for empirical investigation. In this article, I discuss two different attempts to defend the Kantian theory of space against geometrical empiricism. Both Cohen and Riehl defended the apriority of geometrical axioms. Cohen pointed out that knowledge necessarily requires both sensibility and understanding. Therefore, he maintained that space can be proved to be a condition of experience without admitting that some statements about it are intrinsically necessary. By contrast, Riehl emphasized universality and necessity as intrinsic properties of a priori knowledge. He was one of the first philosophers to discuss the space problem in detail and to distinguish between a priori properties of space and empirical properties. Nevertheless, I suggest that Cohen developed a more plausible view because he was not committed to any spatial structure independently of empirical science.
...MoreDescription On the challenge that non-Euclidean geometry presented to the Kantian theory of space in the 19th century.
Similar Citations
Article
Heidelberger, Michael;
(2007)
From Neo-Kantianism to Critical Realism: Space and the Mind-Body Problem in Riehl and Schlick
Book
Christian Damböck;
(2016)
Deutscher Empirismus: Studien zur Philosophie im deutschsprachigen Raum 1830–1930
Chapter
Marco Giovanelli;
(2024)
Il 'problema della materia' nella Scuola di Marburgo
Article
Jurkowitz, Edward;
(2010)
Helmholtz's Early Empiricism and the Erhaltung der Kraft
Article
Belkind, Ori;
(2013)
Leibniz and Newton on Space
Article
Andrea Reichenberger;
(2021)
Émilie Du Châtelet on Space and Time
Article
Callender, Craig;
(2005)
Answers in Search of a Question: `Proofs' of the Tri-Dimensionality of Space
Chapter
Friedman, Michael;
(2012)
Newton and Kant on Absolute Space: From Theology to Transcendental Philosophy
Article
Gaukroger, Stephen W.;
Dalia Nassar;
(2016)
Introduction: Kant and the Empirical Sciences
Book
Matthias Neuber;
(2016)
Husserl, Cassirer, Schlick: Wissenschaftliche Philosophie’ im Spannungsfeld von Phänomenologie, Neukantianismus und logischem Empirismus
Article
Claus Beisbart;
(2022)
What Is the Spatiotemporal Extension of the Universe? Underdetermination according to Kant’s First Antinomy and in Present-Day Cosmology
Article
Rudolf Meer;
(2024)
Ilse Schneider (and Alois Riehl) on the Space-Time Problem in Kant and Einstein: New Perspectives on Neo-Kantianism and Positivism
Article
Boi, Luciano;
(1996)
Les géométries non euclidiennes, le problème philosophique de l'espace et la conception transcendantale: Helmholtz et Kant, les néo-kantiens, Einstein, Poincaré et Mach
Article
Mormann, Thomas;
Katz, Mikhail;
(2013)
Infinitesimals as an Issue of Neo-Kantian Philosophy of Science
Article
Makkreel, Rudolf A.;
(2008)
Kant and the Development of the Human and Cultural Sciences
Article
Sauer, Tilman;
(2006)
Field Equations in Teleparallel Space-Time: Einstein's Fernparallelismus Approach Toward Unified Field Theory
Book
De Risi, Vincenzo;
(2015)
Mathematizing Space: The Objects of Geometry from Antiquity to the Early Modern Age
Chapter
De Risi, Vincenzo;
(2015)
Introduction
Chapter
Michael Friedman;
(2015)
Kant on Geometry and Experience
Book
Vinci, Thomas C.;
(2015)
Space, Geometry, and Kant's Transcendental Deduction of the Categories
Be the first to comment!