Vital Forces and Organization: Philosophy of Nature and Biology in Karl Friedrich Kielmeyer (2014)
The historical literature on German life science at the end of the 18th century has tried to rehabilitate eighteenth century vitalism by stressing its difference from Naturphilosophie. Focusing on the work of Karl Friedrich Kielmeyer this paper argues that these positions are based on a historiographical bias and that the clear-cut boundary between German vitalism and Naturphilosophie is historically unattested. On the contrary, they both belong to the process of conceptual genealogy that contributed to the project of a general biology. The latter emerged as the science concerned with the laws that regulate the organization of living nature as a whole. The focus on organization was, at least partially, the result of the debate surrounding the notion of “vital force”, which originated in the mid-eighteenth century and caused a shift from a regulative to a constitutive understanding of teleology.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
Zammito, John H.;
(2012)
The Lenoir Thesis Revisited: Blumenbach and Kant
(/isis/citation/CBB001221595/)
Article
Michelini, Francesca;
(2012)
Hegel's Notion of Natural Purpose
(/isis/citation/CBB001221596/)
Article
Jessica Riskin;
(2020)
Biology’s mistress, a brief history
(/isis/citation/CBB880456753/)
Book
Bach, Thomas;
(2001)
Biologie und Philosophie bei C. F. Kielmeyer und F. W. J. Schelling
(/isis/citation/CBB000501371/)
Book
Charles Wolfe;
(2019)
La philosophie de la biologie avant la biologie: Une histoire du vitalisme
(/isis/citation/CBB816518126/)
Article
Gissis, Snait B.;
(2014)
The Continuing Vitality of the Problématique of Vitalism?
(/isis/citation/CBB001421080/)
Book
Schmitt, Stéphane;
(2006)
Les forces vitales et leur distribution dans la nature: un essai de “systématique physiologique”
(/isis/citation/CBB000950585/)
Article
Luca Corti;
(2022)
The ‘Is’ and the ‘Ought’ of the Animal Organism: Hegel’s Account of Biological Normativity
(/isis/citation/CBB964888680/)
Article
Aaron Wells;
(2020)
Kant, Linnaeus, and the economy of nature
(/isis/citation/CBB872058525/)
Book
Cécilia Bognon-Küss;
Charles T. Wolfe;
(2019)
Philosophy of Biology Before Biology
(/isis/citation/CBB297114734/)
Article
Hale, Piers J.;
(2006)
The Search for Purpose in a Post-Darwinian Universe: George Bernard Shaw, “Creative Evolution,” and Shavian Eugenics: “The Dark Side of the Force”
(/isis/citation/CBB000774681/)
Article
Lewens, Tim;
(2000)
Function Talk and the Artefact Model
(/isis/citation/CBB000770647/)
Article
Ariew, André;
(2003)
Ernst Mayr's “Ultimate/Proximate” Distinction Reconsidered and Reconstructed
(/isis/citation/CBB000340589/)
Book
Godfrey-Smith, Peter;
(2014)
Philosophy of Biology
(/isis/citation/CBB001510277/)
Article
Lipton, Peter;
(2000)
Introduction: The Pull of Teleology
(/isis/citation/CBB000770642/)
Article
Russell, Doug;
(2015)
Toward a Pragmatist Epistemology: Arthur O. Lovejoy's and H. S. Jennings's Biophilosophical Responses to Neovitalism, 1909--1914
(/isis/citation/CBB001422099/)
Article
Sandy C. Boucher;
(2021)
Biological Teleology, Reductionism, and Verbal Disputes
(/isis/citation/CBB536738665/)
Book
Koons, Robert C.;
(2000)
Realism Regained: An Exact Theory of Causation, Teleology, and the Mind
(/isis/citation/CBB000410586/)
Thesis
Hamilton, Andrew;
(2005)
Laws, Causes, and Kinds: Toward a Solution to the Biology Problem
(/isis/citation/CBB001560575/)
Article
Victor J. Luque;
(2016)
The Principle of Stasis: Why drift is not a Zero-Cause Law
(/isis/citation/CBB000574296/)
Be the first to comment!