Article ID: CBB001421511

Defining a Discovery: Priority and Methodological Controversy in Early Nineteenth-Century Anatomy (2014)

unapi

In the early nineteenth century, Charles Bell and François Magendie engaged in a decades-long priority dispute over the discovery of the roots of motor and sensory nerves. The constantly recalibrated arguments of its participants illuminate changes in the life sciences during that period. When Bell first wrote about the nerves in 1811, surgeon-anatomists ran small schools out of their homes, natural theology was in vogue, exchanges between British and French medical practitioners were limited by the Napoleonic Wars, and British practitioners typically rejected experimental physiology and vivisection. By the end of Magendie's career, medical science was produced in the laboratory, taught through artfully produced performances of the sort at which Magendie excelled, and disseminated through journals. It is not entirely clear which historical character, Bell or Magendie, `won' the dispute, nor that they even had clear and consistent positions in it, but what is clear is that one style of science had won out over the other, and over the course of the dispute, pedagogy lost pride of place in medical science.

...More
Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB001421511/

Similar Citations

Article Berkowitz, Carin; (2006)
Disputed Discovery: Vivisection and Experiment in the 19th Century (/isis/citation/CBB000771702/)

Article Mayer, Jed; (2008)
The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Laboratory Animals (/isis/citation/CBB001030099/)

Article Feller, David Allan; (2009)
Dog Fight: Darwin as Animal Advocate in the Antivivisection Controversy of 1875 (/isis/citation/CBB000954233/)

Thesis Stelmackowich, Cindy Lee; (2010)
Bodies of Knowledge: Nineteenth Century Anatomical Atlases, 1800--1860 (/isis/citation/CBB001562744/)

Book Carin Berkowitz; (2015)
Charles Bell and the Anatomy of Reform (/isis/citation/CBB321165855/)

Article Berkowitz, Carin; (2014)
Charles Bell's Seeing Hand: Teaching Anatomy to the Senses in Britain, 1750--1840 (/isis/citation/CBB001551591/)

Chapter Milburn, Colin; (2008)
Wissenschaft aus der Hölle: Jack the Ripper und die viktorianische Vivisektion (/isis/citation/CBB001024352/)

Chapter Marsden, Simon; (2007)
Dr. Moreau's Crimes: H. G. Wells and the Victorian Vivisection Controversy (/isis/citation/CBB001035836/)

Article Feller, David A.; (2009)
Dog Fight: Darwin as Animal Advocate in the Anti-Vivisection Controversy of 1875 (/isis/citation/CBB001030028/)

Article Gallistel, C. R.; (1981)
Bell, Magendie, and the proposals to restrict the use of animals in neurobehavioral research (/isis/citation/CBB000015787/)

Article Rice, Gillian; (1987)
The Bell-Magendie-Walker controversy (/isis/citation/CBB000050512/)

Chapter Julius Rocca; (2016)
Anatomy and Physiology (/isis/citation/CBB558199636/)

Book Elwick, James; (2007)
Styles of Reasoning in the British Life Sciences: Shared Assumptions, 1820--1858 (/isis/citation/CBB000773747/)

Authors & Contributors
Berkowitz, Carin
Feller, David Allan
Stelmackowich, Cindy Lee
Rocca, Julius
Rice, Gillian
Morabito, Carmela
Journals
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences
Victorian Studies
Nuncius: Annali di Storia della Scienza
Medizinhistorisches Journal
Medical History
Journal of the History of the Neurosciences
Publishers
State University of New York at Binghamton
University of Chicago Press
Shaker
Pickering & Chatto
Futura
Concepts
Anatomy
Vivisection
Physiology
Controversies and disputes
Zoology
Physicians; doctors
People
Bell, Charles
Magendie, François
Darwin, Charles Robert
Wells, Herbert George
Haller, Albrecht von
Walker, Alexander
Time Periods
19th century
20th century, early
18th century
16th century
Places
Great Britain
Germany
London (England)
France
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment