Leibniz-Äquivalenz vs. Einstein-Äquivalenz. Was man von der Logisch-Empiristischen (Fehl-)Interpretation des Punkt-Koinzidenz-Arguments lernen kann (2013)
The discovery that Einstein's celebrated argument for general covariance, the 'point-coincidence argument', was actually a response to the 'hole argument' has generated an intense philosophical debate in the last thirty years. Even if the philosophical consequences of Einstein's argument turned out to be highly controversial, the protagonists of such a debate seem to agree on considering Einstein's argument as an expression of 'Leibniz equivalence', a modern version of Leibniz's celebrated indiscernibility arguments against Newton's absolute space. The paper attempts to show that the reference to Leibniz, however plausible at first sight, is actually in many respects misleading. In particular it is claimed that the Logical Empiricists offer a significant historical example of an attempt to interpret the point-coincidence argument as an indiscernibility argument in the sense of Leibniz, similar to those used in 19th century by Helmholtz, Hausdorff or Poincaré. However the logical empiricist account of General Relativity clearly failed to grasp the philosophical novelty of Einstein's theory. Thus, if Einstein's point coincidence/hole argument can be regarded as an indiscernibility argument, it cannot be an indiscernibility argument in the sense of Leibniz. Einstein rather introduced a new form of indiscernibility argument, which might be better described as an expression of 'Einstein-equivalence'. Developing some ideas of Weyl it is argued that, whereas Leibniz's arguments introduced the notion of 'symmetry' in the history of science, Einstein's argument seems to anticipate what we now call 'gauge freedom'. If in the first case indiscernibility arises from a lack of mathematical structure, in the second case it is a consequence of a surplus of mathematical structure.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
Giovanelli, Marco;
(2013)
Erich Kretschmann as a Proto-Logical-Empiricist: Adventures and Misadventures of the Point-Coincidence Argument
(/isis/citation/CBB001213352/)
Article
Boi, Luciano;
(1996)
Les géométries non euclidiennes, le problème philosophique de l'espace et la conception transcendantale: Helmholtz et Kant, les néo-kantiens, Einstein, Poincaré et Mach
(/isis/citation/CBB000072476/)
Article
D'Agostino, Salvo;
(2004)
The Bild Conception of Physical Theory: Helmholtz, Hertz, and Schrödinger
(/isis/citation/CBB000641781/)
Article
Patton, Lydia;
(2009)
Signs, Toy Models, and the a priori: From Helmholtz to Wittgenstein
(/isis/citation/CBB000932502/)
Book
Engler, Ole;
Iven, Mathias;
(2010)
Moritz Schlick: Ursprünge und Entwicklungen seines Denkens
(/isis/citation/CBB001032068/)
Book
Galina Weinstein;
(2015)
Einstein's Pathway to the Special Theory of Relativity
(/isis/citation/CBB495363061/)
Article
Pesic, Peter;
(2013)
Helmholtz, Riemann, and the Sirens: Sound, Color, and the “Problem of Space”
(/isis/citation/CBB001320409/)
Book
Galison, Peter;
(2003)
Einstein's Clocks and Poincaré's Maps: Empires of Time
(/isis/citation/CBB000470038/)
Article
Abiko, Seiya;
(2005)
The Light-Velocity Postulate? The Essential Difference between the Theories of Lorentz-Poincaré and Einstein
(/isis/citation/CBB001022855/)
Chapter
Gereon Wolters;
(2018)
Mach e la relatività: una storia infinita ambientata a HOPOSia?
(/isis/citation/CBB146853924/)
Article
Ebbinghaus, Heinz-Dieter;
(2007)
Zermelo and the Heidelberg Congress 1904
(/isis/citation/CBB000773212/)
Article
Achilles, Rüdiger;
Bonfiglioli, Andrea;
(2012)
The Early Proofs of the Theorem of Campbell, Baker, Hausdorff, and Dynkin
(/isis/citation/CBB001232495/)
Chapter
Epple, Moritz;
(2006)
Felix Hausdorff's Considered Empiricism
(/isis/citation/CBB000800125/)
Article
Siegmund-Schultze, Reinhard;
(2010)
Sets versus Trial Sequences, Hausdorff versus Von Mises: “Pure” Mathematics Prevails in the Foundations of Probability around 1920
(/isis/citation/CBB001022129/)
Book
Hausdorff, Felix;
Chatterji, S. D.;
Remmert, R.;
Scharlau, W.;
(2001)
Gesammelte Werke: Band IV: Analysis, Algebra und Zahlentheorie
(/isis/citation/CBB000501770/)
Article
Heinzmann, Gerhard;
(2001)
The Foundations of Geometry and the Concept of Motion: Helmholtz and Poincaré
(/isis/citation/CBB000102562/)
Book
Bour, Pierre Edouard;
Rebuschi, Manuel;
Rollet, Laurent;
(2010)
Construction: Festschrift for Gerhard Heinzmann
(/isis/citation/CBB001032083/)
Book
Blackmore, John T.;
(2010)
Ernst Mach's Graz (1864--1867): Where Much Science and Philosophy Were Developed
(/isis/citation/CBB001024110/)
Article
van Strien, Marij;
(2013)
The Nineteenth Century Conflict between Mechanism and Irreversibility
(/isis/citation/CBB001213355/)
Article
Galison, Peter;
(2004)
Introduction
(/isis/citation/CBB000550093/)
Be the first to comment!