Porter, Theodore M. (Author)
For more than a century, geneticists have consistently identified the origins of their science with Gregor Mendel's experiments on peas. Mendelism, they have said, demonstrated at long last that biological inheritance was not, as had so often been supposed, blending, but particulate. Many historians of biology continue to interpret the conflict of biometricians and Mendelians at the start of the twentieth century in these terms, identifying biometry with the (incorrect) blending mechanism. But this view of blending is history as war by other means. While Francis Galton's contrast between blended and alternate inheritance had become familiar by 1905, he and his interpreters understood the two forms as differing outcomes of breeding, not as rival theories. Only a few biologists in this period went beyond blending as a description of results of breeding to a blending mechanism, and these were not biometricians. Recognizing this, we can see also that statistical methods and models were central to evolutionary genetics right from the start. The evolutionary synthesis, while reshaping their role, did not create it.
...More
Article
Yafeng Shan;
(2021)
Beyond Mendelism and Biometry
(/isis/citation/CBB308136354/)
Article
Pence, Charles H.;
(2011)
“Describing Our Whole Experience”: The Statistical Philosophies of W. F. R. Weldon and Karl Pearson
(/isis/citation/CBB001221537/)
Article
Edwards, A. W. F.;
(2012)
Punnett's Square
(/isis/citation/CBB001221605/)
Chapter
Gissis, Snait B.;
Jablonka, Eva;
(2011)
The Exclusion of Soft (“Lamarckian”) Inheritance from the Modern Synthesis
(/isis/citation/CBB001500089/)
Book
Rushton, Alan R.;
(2009)
Genetics in Medicine in Great Britain 1600 to 1939
(/isis/citation/CBB001020882/)
Article
Nicholas W. Gillham;
(2015)
The Battle Between the Biometricians and the Mendelians: How Sir Francis Galton’s Work Caused his Disciples to Reach Conflicting Conclusions About the Hereditary Mechanism
(/isis/citation/CBB738872407/)
Article
Roll-Hansen, Nils;
(2009)
Sources of Wilhelm Johannsen's Genotype Theory
(/isis/citation/CBB000932223/)
Thesis
Wynn, James;
(2005)
Life's Rich Pattern: The Role of Statistics and Probability in NineteenthCentury Argumentation for Theories of Evolution, Variation, and Heredity
(/isis/citation/CBB001561634/)
Book
Maas, Werner Karl;
(2001)
Gene Action: A Historical Account
(/isis/citation/CBB000101923/)
Article
Adam Krashniak;
Ehud Lamm;
(2021)
Francis Galton’s Regression Towards Mediocrity and the Stability of Types
(/isis/citation/CBB928770929/)
Article
Radick, Gregory;
(2011)
Physics in the Galtonian Sciences of Heredity
(/isis/citation/CBB001023997/)
Book
Simunek, Michal;
Hoßfeld, Uwe;
Breidbach, Olaf;
Müller, Miklós;
(2010)
Mendelism in Bohemia and Moravia, 1900--1930: Collection of Selected Papers
(/isis/citation/CBB001024765/)
Article
Godin, Benoît;
(2007)
From Eugenics to Scientometrics: Galton, Cattell, and Men of Science
(/isis/citation/CBB000773318/)
Article
Tabery, James;
(2008)
R. A. Fisher, Lancelot Hogben, and the Origin(s) of Genotype--Environment Interaction
(/isis/citation/CBB000850683/)
Article
Ruiz Gutiérrez, Rosaura;
Guazo, López;
Suárez, Laura;
(2002)
Eugenesia, herencia, selección y biometría en la obra de Francis Galton
(/isis/citation/CBB000300777/)
Thesis
Cannariato, Christy A.;
(2007)
The Probability of Progress: Resisting History in Galton and Modern Fiction,1869--1936
(/isis/citation/CBB001561289/)
Article
Pareti, Germana;
(2019)
Ereditarietà come storia. Il contributo degli embriologi alla discussione biogenetica
(/isis/citation/CBB806978292/)
Article
Rushton, A. R.;
(2000)
Nettleship, Pearson and Bateson: The biometric-Mendelian debate in a medical context
(/isis/citation/CBB000110375/)
Article
Allen, Garland E.;
(2003)
Mendel and Modern Genetics: The Legacy for Today
(/isis/citation/CBB000600545/)
Article
Wolfe, Audra J.;
(2010)
What Does It Mean to Go Public? The American Response to Lysenkoism, Reconsidered
(/isis/citation/CBB001022644/)
Be the first to comment!