IsisCB Explore

Article ID: CBB001420141

The Curious Case of Blending Inheritance (2014)

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences
Volume: 46
Pages: 125--132

Outside Links

WorldCat

Google Scholar

JSTOR

Academia.edu

Mendelism; Mendelian inheritance Inheritance Genetics Biometry Probability and statistics Evolution 20th century, early Mendel, Gregor Johann Galton, Francis

For more than a century, geneticists have consistently identified the origins of their science with Gregor Mendel's experiments on peas. Mendelism, they have said, demonstrated at long last that biological inheritance was not, as had so often been supposed, blending, but particulate. Many historians of biology continue to interpret the conflict of biometricians and Mendelians at the start of the twentieth century in these terms, identifying biometry with the (incorrect) blending mechanism. But this view of blending is history as war by other means. While Francis Galton's contrast between blended and alternate inheritance had become familiar by 1905, he and his interpreters understood the two forms as differing outcomes of breeding, not as rival theories. Only a few biologists in this period went beyond blending as a description of results of breeding to a blending mechanism, and these were not biometricians. Recognizing this, we can see also that statistical methods and models were central to evolutionary genetics right from the start. The evolutionary synthesis, while reshaping their role, did not create it.

...More

Citation URI

https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB001420141/

Citations Indexes

Similar Citations

Article Charles H. Pence; (2022)
Of stirps and chromosomes: Generality through detail

Article Yafeng Shan; (2021)
Beyond Mendelism and Biometry

Article Pence, Charles H.; (2011)
“Describing Our Whole Experience”: The Statistical Philosophies of W. F. R. Weldon and Karl Pearson

Article Edwards, A. W. F.; (2012)
Punnett's Square

Chapter Gissis, Snait B.; Jablonka, Eva; (2011)
The Exclusion of Soft (“Lamarckian”) Inheritance from the Modern Synthesis

Book Rushton, Alan R.; (2009)
Genetics in Medicine in Great Britain 1600 to 1939

Article Nicholas W. Gillham; (2015)
The Battle Between the Biometricians and the Mendelians: How Sir Francis Galton’s Work Caused his Disciples to Reach Conflicting Conclusions About the Hereditary Mechanism

Article Ruiz Gutiérrez, Rosaura; Guazo, López; Suárez, Laura; (2002)
Eugenesia, herencia, selección y biometría en la obra de Francis Galton

Article Roll-Hansen, Nils; (2009)
Sources of Wilhelm Johannsen's Genotype Theory

Book Maas, Werner Karl; (2001)
Gene Action: A Historical Account

Article Radick, Gregory; (2011)
Physics in the Galtonian Sciences of Heredity

Book Simunek, Michal; Hoßfeld, Uwe; Breidbach, Olaf; Müller, Miklós; (2010)
Mendelism in Bohemia and Moravia, 1900--1930: Collection of Selected Papers

Article Adam Krashniak; Ehud Lamm; (2021)
Francis Galton’s Regression Towards Mediocrity and the Stability of Types

Article Godin, Benoît; (2007)
From Eugenics to Scientometrics: Galton, Cattell, and Men of Science

Article Pareti, Germana; (2019)
Ereditarietà come storia. Il contributo degli embriologi alla discussione biogenetica

Article Tabery, James; (2008)
R. A. Fisher, Lancelot Hogben, and the Origin(s) of Genotype--Environment Interaction

Article Nicola Bertoldi; (2022)
“Batesonian Mendelism” and “Pearsonian biometry”: Shedding new light on the controversy between William Bateson and Karl Pearson

Book Everson, Ted; (2007)
The Gene: A Historical Perspective

Article Wolfe, Audra J.; (2010)
What Does It Mean to Go Public? The American Response to Lysenkoism, Reconsidered

Article Allen, Garland E.; (2003)
Mendel and Modern Genetics: The Legacy for Today

Comments

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}