Some time in the late 1590s, the Welsh amateur mathematician John Bulkeley wrote to Thomas Harriot asking his opinion about the properties of a truly gargantuan (but totally imaginary) plano-spherical convex lens, 48 feet in diameter. While Bulkeley's original letter is lost, Harriot devoted several pages to the optical properties of Mr Bulkeley his Glasse in his optical papers (now in British Library MS Add. 6789), paying particular attention to the place of its burning point. Harriot's calculational methods in these papers are almost unique in Harriot's optical remains, in that he uses both the sine law of refraction and interpolation from Witelo's refraction tables in order to analyze the passage of light through the glass. For this and other reasons, it is very likely that Harriot wrote his papers on Bulkeley's glass very shortly after his discovery of the law and while still working closely with Witelo's great Optics; the papers represent, perhaps, his very first application of the law. His and Bulkeley's interest in this giant glass conform to a long English tradition of curiosity about the optical and burning properties of large glasses, which grew more intense in late sixteenth-century England. In particular, Thomas Digges's bold and widely known assertions about his father's glasses that could see things several miles distant and could burn objects a half-mile or further away may have attracted Harriot and Bulkeley's skeptical attention; for Harriot's analysis of the burning distance and the intensity of Bulkeley's fantastic lens, it shows that Digges's claims could never have been true about any real lens (and this, I propose, was what Bulkeley had asked about in his original letter to Harriot). There was also a deeper, mathematical relevance to the problem that may have caught Harriot's attention. His most recent source on refraction---Giambattista della Porta's De refractione of 1593---identified a mathematical flaw in Witelo's cursory suggestion about the optics of a lens (the only place that lenses appear, however fleetingly, in the writings of the thirteenth-century Perspectivist authors). In his early notes on optics, in a copy of Witelo's optics, Harriot highlighted Witelo's remarks on the lens and della Porta's criticism (which he found unsatisfactory). The most significant problem with Witelo's theorem would disappear as the radius of curvature of the lens approached infinity. Bulkeley's gigantic glass, then, may have provided Harriot an opportunity to test out Witelo's claims about a plano-spherical glass, at a time when he was still intensely concerned with the problems and methods of the Perspectivist school.
...More
Chapter
Goulding, Robert;
(2012)
Chymicorum in morem: Refraction, Matter Theory, and Secrecy in the Harriot-Kepler Correspondence
(/isis/citation/CBB001252675/)
Book
Francesco Maurolico;
Riccardo Bellé;
Ken'ichi Takahashi;
(2017)
Francisci Maurolyci Optica
(/isis/citation/CBB397100263/)
Article
Spiegel, Richard J.;
(2015)
John Flamsteed and the Turn of the Screw: Mechanical Uncertainty, the Skilful Astronomer and the Burden of Seeing Correctly at the Royal Observatory, Greenwich
(/isis/citation/CBB001202244/)
Book
Fox, Robert;
(2000)
Thomas Harriot: An Elizabethan Man of Science
(/isis/citation/CBB000110138/)
Article
Raynaud, Dominique;
(2010)
Les débats sur les fondements de la perspective linéaire de Piero della Francesca à Egnatio Danti: un cas de mathématisation à rebours
(/isis/citation/CBB001031514/)
Article
Camerota, Filippo;
(2006)
Teaching Euclid in a Practical Context: Linear Perspective and Practical Geometry
(/isis/citation/CBB000671073/)
Book
Andersen, Kirsti;
(2007)
The Geometry of an Art: The History of the Mathematical Theory of Perspective from Alberti to Monge
(/isis/citation/CBB000850432/)
Article
Thomas, Hugh;
(2011)
Weather and Phenological Observations at Hurstpierpoint 1859 to 1862
(/isis/citation/CBB001321071/)
Article
Stephen C. McCluskey;
(2018)
ARCHAEOASTRONOMICAL REFRACTION RECONSIDERED
(/isis/citation/CBB029274814/)
Thesis
Sanam Nader-Esfahani;
(2016)
Knowledge and Representation through Baroque Eyes: Literature and Optics in France and Italy ca. 1600-1640
(/isis/citation/CBB777061088/)
Chapter
Secord, Anne;
(2013)
Talbot's First Lens: Botanical Vision as an Exact Science
(/isis/citation/CBB001500495/)
Article
Péoux, Gérald;
(2010)
Atmospheric Refraction and the Ramus Circle: Aspects of a Late Sixteenth-Century Dispute
(/isis/citation/CBB001031487/)
Article
Robert Goulding;
(2022)
The Harvest of Optics: Descartes, Mydorge, and their paths to a theory of refraction
(/isis/citation/CBB914527455/)
Thesis
Abou-Nemeh, Samar Catherine;
(2012)
Nicolas Hartsoeker's Systeme of Nature: Physics by Conjecture and Optics by Design in Early Modern Europe
(/isis/citation/CBB001567372/)
Article
Hon, Giora;
Zik, Yaakov;
(2007)
Geometry of Light and Shadow: Francesco Maurolyco (1494--1575) and the Pinhole Camera
(/isis/citation/CBB000773028/)
Book
Hamel, Jürgen;
Keil, Inge;
(2007)
Der Meister und die Fernrohre: Das Wechselspiel zwischen Astronomie und Optik in der Geschichte
(/isis/citation/CBB000930172/)
Article
Rebekah C. White;
Giles E. M. Gasper;
Tom C. B. McLeish;
Brian K. Tanner;
Joshua S. Harvey;
Sigbjørn O. Sønnesyn;
Laura K. Young;
Hannah E. Smithson;
(2021)
Magnifying Grains of Sand, Seeds, and Blades of Grass: Optical Effects in Robert Grosseteste’s De iride (On the Rainbow) (circa 1228–1230)
(/isis/citation/CBB058339927/)
Book
Nils Viktor Emanuel Nordenmark;
(2016)
The Invention of the Achromatic and Aplanatic Lens: With Special Regard to the Role Played by Samuel Klingenstierna
(/isis/citation/CBB164571440/)
Article
Hao Dong;
(2021)
Hobbes’s model of refraction and derivation of the sine law
(/isis/citation/CBB808807913/)
Article
Jarosław Włodarczyk;
(2020)
The pre-telescopic observations of the Moon in early seventeenth-century London: The case of Edward Gresham (1565–1613)
(/isis/citation/CBB434530810/)
Be the first to comment!