Abstract In this paper I examine the foundations of Laplace's famous statement of determinism in 1814, and argue that rather than derived from his mechanics, this statement is based on general philosophical principles, namely the principle of sufficient reason and the law of continuity. It is usually supposed that Laplace's statement is based on the fact that each system in classical mechanics has an equation of motion which has a unique solution. But Laplace never proved this result, and in fact he could not have proven it, since it depends on a theorem about uniqueness of solutions to differential equations that was only developed later on. I show that the idea that is at the basis of Laplace's determinism was in fact widespread in enlightenment France, and is ultimately based on a re-interpretation of Leibnizian metaphysics, specifically the principle of sufficient reason and the law of continuity. Since the law of continuity also lies at the basis of the application of differential calculus in physics, one can say that Laplace's determinism and the idea that systems in physics can be described by differential equations with unique solutions have a common foundation.

...More Citation URI

Article
Boris Kožnjak;
(2015)

Who Let the Demon Out? Laplace and Boscovich on Determinism
(/isis/citation/CBB447019454/)

Book
Henrich, Jörn;
(2010)

Die Fixierung des modernen Wissenschaftsideals durch Laplace
(/isis/citation/CBB001023200/)

Article
Xu, Chuansheng;
Qu, Anjing;
(2006)

A Study on Pierre Simon de Laplace's *Théorie Analytiques des Probabilitiés*
(/isis/citation/CBB001020782/)

Article
Marij van Strien;
(2021)

Was physics ever deterministic? The historical basis of determinism and the image of classical physics
(/isis/citation/CBB256271933/)

Book
Bensaude-Vincent, Bernadette;
Blondel, Christine;
(2008)

Science and Spectacle in the European Enlightenment
(/isis/citation/CBB000850395/)

Book
Antonio D'Andria;
(2019)

"Educato a magnanimi sensi": Nicola Fiorentino illuminista del dissenso
(/isis/citation/CBB580678362/)

Article
Craik, Alex D. D.;
(2013)

“Continuity and Change”: Representing Mass Conservation in Fluid Mechanics
(/isis/citation/CBB001211054/)

Chapter
Hahn, Roger;
(2002)

L'image de Newton reconstruite par Laplace
(/isis/citation/CBB000700883/)

Article
David Rabouin;
Richard T. W. Arthur;
(2020)

Leibniz’s syncategorematic infinitesimals II: their existence, their use and their role in the justification of the differential calculus
(/isis/citation/CBB320925047/)

Article
Jean-Pierre Cléro;
(2017)

Laplace, le “ Newton français ”
(/isis/citation/CBB383726679/)

Article
Jean-Pierre Cléro;
(2015)

Y a-t-il une philosophie de Laplace?
(/isis/citation/CBB800641855/)

Article
J. B. Shank;
(2019)

How Calculus-Based Mathematical Physics Arose in France after 1700: A Historicized Actor-Network Narrative as Explanation
(/isis/citation/CBB156450988/)

Book
Hahn, Roger;
(2004)

Le Système du Monde: Pierre Simon Laplace. Un itinéraire dans la science
(/isis/citation/CBB000471550/)

Article
Katz, Mikhail G.;
Sherry, David M.;
(2012)

Leibniz's Laws of Continuity and Homogeneity
(/isis/citation/CBB001211734/)

Book
Hahn, Roger;
(2013)

Correspondance de Pierre Simon Laplace (1749--1827)
(/isis/citation/CBB001211954/)

Book
Ordóñez, Javier;
Rioja, Ana;
(2006)

Exposición del sistema del mundo de Pierre-Simon Laplace
(/isis/citation/CBB001032176/)

Article
Hahn, Roger;
(2010)

Laplace's Private Religious Discomfort
(/isis/citation/CBB001220613/)

Book
Hahn, Roger;
(2013)

Correspondance de Pierre Simon Laplace (1749--1827)
(/isis/citation/CBB001450201/)

Book
Bates, David William;
(2002)

Enlightenment Aberrations: Error and Revolution in France
(/isis/citation/CBB000201777/)

Chapter
Augusto J. Franco Oliveira;
(2014)

Poincaré and the Principles of the Calculus
(/isis/citation/CBB092613565/)

Be the first to comment!