Edward O. Wilson's recent decision to abandon kin selection theory has sent shockwaves throughout the biological sciences. Over the past two years, more than a hundred biologists have signed letters protesting his reversal. Making sense of Wilson's decision and the controversy it has spawned requires familiarity with the historical record. This entails not only examining the conditions under which kin selection theory first emerged, but also the organicist tradition against which it rebelled. In similar fashion, one must not only examine Wilson's long career, but also those thinkers who influenced him most, especially his intellectual grandfather, William Morton Wheeler (1865--1937). Wilson belongs to a long line of organicists, biologists whose research highlighted integration and coordination, many of whom struggled over the exact same biological riddles that have long defined Wilson's career. Drawing inspiration (and sometimes ideas) from these intellectual forebears, Wilson is confident that he has finally identified the origin of the social impulse.
...More
Article
Charlotte Sleigh;
(2025)
How Ants Made Sociobiology: Cybernetics and the Organicist Tradition
Chapter
Sleigh, Charlotte;
(2004)
“The Ninth Mortal Sin”: The Lamarckism of W. M. Wheeler
Article
Jeler, Ciprian;
(2015)
Is There Such a Thing as “Group Selection” in the Contextual Analysis Framework?
Book
Normandin, Sebastien;
Wolfe, Charles T.;
(2013)
Vitalism and the Scientific Image in Post-Enlightenment Life Science, 1800--2010
Article
Peterson, Erik;
(2014)
The Conquest of Vitalism or the Eclipse of Organicism? The 1930s Cambridge Organizer Project and the Social Network of Mid-Twentieth-Century Biology
Article
Joseph L. Graves;
(2025)
Sociobiology Then and Now: A Biologist’s Perspective
Chapter
Stoll, Mark;
(2007)
Edward Osborne Wilson: The Gospel According to Sociobiology
Book
Wilson, Edward O.;
(2006)
Nature Revealed: Selected Writings, 1949--2006
Article
Rebecca Sear;
(2025)
The Legacy of Wilson’s Sociobiology for the Human Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, Fifty Years On
Article
Cora Stuhrmann;
(2025)
The Eco-Political Future of Sociobiology
Article
Christa Kuljian;
(2025)
She Said—Feminist Critiques of Sociobiology Begin in 1975
Article
Nayanika Ghosh;
(2025)
Legitimating the Sociobiology Debate in American Science
Article
David Sepkoski;
Mark Borrello;
(2025)
Sociobiology and the Politics of Objectivity
Article
Cora Stuhrmann;
Nayanika Ghosh;
(2025)
No End in Sight: The Sociobiology Debate at Fifty
Article
Pierrick Bourrat;
(2020)
Natural selection and the reference grain problem
Article
André Ariew;
Collin Rice;
Yasha Rohwer;
(2015)
Autonomous-Statistical Explanations and Natural Selection
Thesis
Green, Lisa Anne;
(2012)
Science for Survival: The Modern Synthesis of Evolution and the Biological Sciences Curriculum Study
Thesis
Dimond, Christopher C.;
(2014)
Three Perspectives on Multilevel Selection: An Experimental, Historical, and Synthetic Analysis of Group-Level Selection
Article
Nash, Richard;
(2015)
William Keith Brooks and the Naturalist's Defense of Darwinism in the Late-Nineteenth Century
Article
Peterson, Erik L.;
(2008)
William Bateson from Balanoglossus to Materials for the Study of Variation: The Transatlantic Roots of Discontinuity and the (Un)naturalness of Selection
Be the first to comment!