Kant's transcendental method, as applied to natural philosophy, considers the laws of physics as conditions of the possibility of experience. A more modest transcendental project is to show how the laws of motion explicate the concepts of motion, force, and causal interaction, as conditions of the possibility of an objective account of nature. This paper argues that such a project is central to the natural philosophy of Newton, and explains some central aspects of the development of his thinking as he wrote the Principia. One guiding scientific aim was the dynamical analysis of any system of interacting bodies, and in particular our solar system; the transcendental question was, what are the conceptual prerequisites for such an analysis? More specifically, what are the conditions for determining true motions within such a system---for posing the question of the frame of the system of the world as an empirical question? A study of the development of Newton's approach to these questions reveals surprising connections with his developing conceptions of force, causality, and the relativity of motion. It also illuminates the comparison between his use of the transcendental method and that of Euler and Kant.
...MoreDescription Argues that one central aim of the natural philosophy of Newton was the dynamical analysis of any system of interacting bodies.
Article Massimi, Michela (2013) Philosophy of Natural Science from Newton to Kant. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (p. 393).
Article
Pesic, Peter;
(2014)
Francis Bacon, Violence, and the Motion of Liberty: The Aristotelian Background
(/isis/citation/CBB001201305/)
Chapter
Brading, Katherine;
(2012)
Newton's Law-Constitutive Approach to Bodies: A Response to Descartes
(/isis/citation/CBB001500338/)
Article
Schliesser, Eric;
(2013)
Newtonian Emanation, Spinozism, Measurement and the Baconian Origins of the Laws of Nature
(/isis/citation/CBB001320864/)
Article
Dyck, Maarten Van;
Verelst, Karin;
(2013)
“Whatever Is Neither Everywhere Nor Anywhere Does Not Exist”: The Concepts of Space and Time in Newton and Leibniz
(/isis/citation/CBB001320861/)
Book
Janiak, Andrew;
Schliesser, Erick;
(2012)
Interpreting Newton: Critical Essays
(/isis/citation/CBB001500334/)
Article
Marko Uršič;
(2015)
Boscovich’s Distinction between the Potential and the Actual Space from the Standpoint of Modern Search for the Union of Mind and Nature
(/isis/citation/CBB056648170/)
Chapter
Huggett, Nick;
(2012)
What Did Newton Mean by “Absolute Motion”?
(/isis/citation/CBB001500345/)
Article
Kerszberg, Pierre;
(2013)
Deduction Versus Discourse: Newton and the Cosmic Phenomena
(/isis/citation/CBB001320867/)
Article
Pourciau, Bruce;
(2006)
Newton's Interpretation of Newton's Second Law
(/isis/citation/CBB000670058/)
Article
Erlichson, H.;
(2002)
Huygens and Newton on Motion in a Cycloid
(/isis/citation/CBB000502807/)
Article
Meli, Domenico Bertoloni;
(2006)
Inherent and Centrifugal Forces in Newton
(/isis/citation/CBB000670062/)
Article
Platt, Andrew R.;
(2011)
Divine Activity and Motive Power in Descartes's Physics
(/isis/citation/CBB001035113/)
Article
Stan, Marius;
(2013)
Kant's Third Law of Mechanics: The Long Shadow of Leibniz
(/isis/citation/CBB001320270/)
Article
Belkind, Ori;
(2013)
Leibniz and Newton on Space
(/isis/citation/CBB001320865/)
Article
Schliesser, Eric;
(2013)
On Reading Newton as an Epicurean: Kant, Spinozism and the Changes to the Principia
(/isis/citation/CBB001320265/)
Article
François Duchesneau;
(2019)
Le recours aux principes architectoniques dans la Dynamica de Leibniz
(/isis/citation/CBB978969993/)
Article
Steigerwald, Joan;
(2010)
Natural Purposes and the Reflecting Power of Judgment: The Problem of the Organism in Kant’s Critical Philosophy
(/isis/citation/CBB001000084/)
Book
Paolo Casini;
(2006)
Hypotheses non fingo: tra Newton e Kant
(/isis/citation/CBB557395471/)
Article
Massimi, Michela;
(2013)
Philosophy of Natural Science from Newton to Kant
(/isis/citation/CBB001320263/)
Article
Laurynas Adomaitis;
(2019)
Equivalence of hypotheses and Galilean censure in Leibniz: A conspiracy or a way to moderate censure?
(/isis/citation/CBB683885385/)
Be the first to comment!