One of the most well known methodological criticisms of evolutionary psychology is Gould's claim that the program pays too much attention to adaptations, and not enough to exaptations. Almost as well known is the standard rebuttal of that criticism: namely, that the study of exaptations in fact depends on the study of adaptations. However, as I try to show in this paper, it is premature to think that this is where this debate ends. First, the notion of exaptation that is commonly used in this debate is different from the one that Gould and Vrba originally defined. Noting this is particularly important, since, second, the standard reply to Gould's criticism only works if the criticism is framed in terms of the former notion of exaptation, and not the latter. However, third, this ultimately does not change the outcome of the debate much, as evolutionary psychologists can respond to the revamped criticism of their program by claiming that the original notion of exaptation is theoretically and empirically uninteresting. By discussing these issues further, I also seek to determine, more generally, which ways of approaching the adaptationism debate in evolutionary biology are useful, and which not.
...More
Article
Johannes Martens;
(2019)
Hamilton meets causal decision theory
(/isis/citation/CBB928905488/)
Article
Schulz, Armin;
(2013)
Exaptation, Adaptation, and Evolutionary Psychology
(/isis/citation/CBB001420746/)
Article
Max Dresow;
(2019)
Macroevolution evolving: Punctuated equilibria and the roots of Stephen Jay Gould's second macroevolutionary synthesis
(/isis/citation/CBB524549653/)
Thesis
Sheldon, Myrna Lynn Perez;
(2014)
The Public Life of Scientific Orthodoxy: Stephen Jay Gould, Evolutionary Biology and American Creationism, 1965--2002
(/isis/citation/CBB001567624/)
Book
Michael Ruse;
Robert J. Richards;
(2017)
The Cambridge Handbook of Evolutionary Ethics
(/isis/citation/CBB838749899/)
Article
Christopher Lean;
Anya Plutynski;
(2015)
The Evolution of Failure: Explaining Cancer as an Evolutionary Process
(/isis/citation/CBB642681425/)
Article
Futuyma, Douglas J.;
(2012)
Robert R. Sokal (1926--2012)
(/isis/citation/CBB001320465/)
Article
Philippe Huneman;
(2019)
The Multifaceted Legacy of the Human Genome Program for Evolutionary Biology: An Epistemological Perspective
(/isis/citation/CBB904878427/)
Article
Lindsay R. Craig;
(2014)
Neo-Darwinism and Evo-Devo: An Argument for Theoretical Pluralism in Evolutionary Biology
(/isis/citation/CBB135771163/)
Article
Klasios, John;
(2014)
The Evolutionary Psychology of Human Mating: A Response to Buller's Critique
(/isis/citation/CBB001421061/)
Article
Armin W. Schulz;
(2016)
Altruism, egoism, or neither: A cognitive-efficiency-based evolutionary biological perspective on helping behavior
(/isis/citation/CBB460292144/)
Book
John P. Jackson;
David J. Depew;
(2017)
Darwinism, Democracy, and Race: American Anthropology and Evolutionary Biology in the Twentieth Century
(/isis/citation/CBB704726330/)
Article
Depew, David J.;
(2011)
Adaptation as Process: The Future of Darwinism and the Legacy of Theodosius Dobzhansky
(/isis/citation/CBB001023991/)
Chapter
Morrey, Douglas;
(2011)
Houellebecq, Genetics and Evolutionary Psychology
(/isis/citation/CBB001202037/)
Article
Brian McLoone;
(2020)
Population and organismal perspectives on trait origins
(/isis/citation/CBB139456486/)
Article
Johnson, Jennifer;
Perez, Myrna;
(2012)
Stephen Jay Gould Papers at the Special Collections and University Archives, Stanford University
(/isis/citation/CBB001251986/)
Article
Tattersall, Ian;
(2001)
Evolution, Genes, and Behavior
(/isis/citation/CBB000102257/)
Book
Brown, Gillian R.;
Kevin N. Laland;
(2011)
Sense and Nonsense: Evolutionary Perspectives on Human Behaviour
(/isis/citation/CBB960667952/)
Article
Pierrick Bourrat;
(2020)
Natural selection and the reference grain problem
(/isis/citation/CBB530242611/)
Article
David Sepkoski;
(2016)
“Replaying Life's Tape”: Simulations, metaphors, and historicity in Stephen Jay Gould's view of life
(/isis/citation/CBB998505163/)
Be the first to comment!