Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg (Author)
The paper approaches the topic of what a general philosophy of science could mean today from the perspective of a historical epistemology. Consequently, in a first step, the paper looks at the notion of generality in the sciences, and how it evolved over time, on the example of the life sciences. In the second part of the paper, the urgency of a general philosophy of science is located in the history of philosophy of science. Two attempts at the beginning of the twentieth century are particularly highlighted: that of Karl Popper and that of Martin Heidegger. Both of them concentrate, albeit in widely different form, on the phenomenon of research as an open-ended process. This trend is even more pronounced in Gaston Bachelard's version of a historical epistemology, whose work is taken as a point of reference for a general historical epistemology of research. The paper concludes with a plea to look, with Georges Canguilhem, at the history of the sciences as a laboratory for epistemology.
...More
Article
Chimisso, Cristina;
(2003)
The Tribunal of Philosophy and Its Norms: History and Philosophy in Georges Canguilhem's Historical Epistemology
Article
David M. Peña-Guzmán;
(2020)
French historical epistemology: Discourse, concepts, and the norms of rationality
Book
Matteo Vagelli;
(2024)
Reconsidering Historical Epistemology: French and Anglophone Styles in History and Philosophy of Science
Article
Rae, Gavin;
(2014)
Heidegger's Influence on Posthumanism: The Destruction of Metaphysics, Technology and the Overcoming of Anthropocentrism
Article
Vagt, Christina;
(2011)
Complementary Correspondence: Heidegger and Heisenberg on the Question Concerning Technology
Book
Nicola Berardi;
(2014)
La rivoluzione copernicana di Popper: tematiche e questioni epistemologiche
Article
Frederick, Danny;
(2012)
Popper, Rationality and the Possibility of Social Science
Book
Jeremy Shearmur;
Geoffrey Stokes;
(2016)
The Cambridge Companion to Popper
Article
Díez, José A.;
(2011)
On Popper's Strong Inductivism (or Strongly Inconsistent Anti-Inductivism)
Book
Jarvie, I. C.;
Milford, Karl;
Miller, David;
(2006)
Karl Popper: A Centenary Assessment
Article
Khaitun, S. D.;
(2011)
Popper's Conclusion on the Possible Refutation of Any Scientific Theory: Lessons for History of Science from Twentieth-Century Philosophical Developments
Article
Rowbottom, Darrell P.;
(2011)
Kuhn Vs. Popper on Criticism and Dogmatism in Science: A Resolution at the Group Level
Book
Francesco Coniglione;
(2025)
Lontano da Popper. L'epistemologia post-positivista e le metamorfosi della razionalità scientifica
Book
Giuseppe Bianco;
Charles T. Wolfe;
Gertrudis Van De Vijver;
(2023)
Canguilhem and Continental Philosophy of Biology
Article
Line Joranger;
(2016)
Individual Perception and Cultural Development: Foucault’s 1954 Approach to Mental Illness and Its History
Book
Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg;
(2010)
An Epistemology of the Concrete
Book
Stuart Elden;
(2021)
The Early Foucault
Article
Sturm, Thomas;
(2012)
Bühler and Popper: Kantian Therapies for the Crisis in Psychology
Article
François Delaporte;
(2018)
The Birth of the Clinic and the Sources of Archaeological History
Article
Enrico Castelli Gattinara;
(2018)
The Relationship between History and Epistemology in Georges Canguilhem and Gaston Bachelard
Be the first to comment!