Studies of the origin and diversification of major groups of plants and animals are contentious topics in current evolutionary biology. This includes the study of the timing and relationships of the two major clades of extant mammals -- marsupials and placentals. Molecular studies concerned with marsupial and placental origin and diversification can be at odds with the fossil record. Such studies are, however, not a recent phenomenon. Over 150 years ago Charles Darwin weighed two alternative views on the origin of marsupials and placentals. Less than a year after the publication of On the origin of species, Darwin outlined these in a letter to Charles Lyell dated 23 September 1860. The letter concluded with two competing phylogenetic diagrams. One showed marsupials as ancestral to both living marsupials and placentals, whereas the other showed a non-marsupial, non-placental as being ancestral to both living marsupials and placentals. These two diagrams are published here for the first time. These are the only such competing phylogenetic diagrams that Darwin is known to have produced. In addition to examining the question of mammalian origins in this letter and in other manuscript notes discussed here, Darwin confronted the broader issue as to whether major groups of animals had a single origin (monophyly) or were the result of continuous creation as advocated for some groups by Richard Owen. Charles Lyell had held similar views to those of Owen, but it is clear from correspondence with Darwin that he was beginning to accept the idea of monophyly of major groups.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
Olivier Rieppel;
(2020)
Morphology and Phylogeny
Article
González Recio, José Luis;
(2011)
Entre John Herschel y Charles Lyell: los compromisos metodológicos y teóricos en la geología de Darwin
Article
Kressing, Frank;
Krischel, Matthis;
Fangerau, Heiner;
(2014)
The “Global Phylogeny” and its Historical Legacy: A Critical Review of a Unified Theory of Human Biological and Linguistic Co-Evolution
Article
Maurizio Esposito;
(2020)
Beyond Haeckel’s Law: Walter Garstang and the Evolutionary Biology that Might Have Been
Article
Aja Watkins;
(2021)
Multi-model approaches to phylogenetics: Implications for idealization
Article
Juanma Sánchez Arteaga;
(2024)
“The Logic of Monsters:” Pere Alberch and the Evolutionary Significance of Experimental Teratology
Article
Ghiselin, Michael T.;
(2015)
Darwin: German Mystic or French Rationalist?
Article
Deutsch, Jean;
(2010)
Darwin and Barnacles
Article
Mary P. Winsor;
(2024)
Reconsidering Utter Extinction
Article
Juan Manuel Rodríguez Caso;
Erica Torrens Rojas;
(2023)
A.R. Wallace and his “evolutionary diagrams”: first Darwinian schemes?
Article
Giuliano Pancaldi;
(2019)
Darwin’s Technology of Life
Article
Carlson, Charles Royal;
(2013)
The Return of Experience: Reinterpreting Dewey for Contemporary Evolutionary Biology
Article
Ambrose, C. T.;
(2010)
Darwin's Historical Sketch---An American Predecessor: C. S. Rafinesque
Article
Tavernier, Johan De;
(2014)
Morality and Nature: Evolutionary Challenges to Christian Ethics
Article
Friedman, William E.;
Diggle, Pamela K.;
(2011)
Charles Darwin and the Origins of Plant Evolutionary Developmental Biology
Chapter
Sober, Elliott;
(2005)
Comparative Psychology Meets Evolutionary Biology: Morgan's Canon and Cladistic Parsimony
Article
Hull, David L.;
(2011)
Defining Darwinism
Article
Pearce, Trevor;
(2010)
“A Great Complication of Circumstances”---Darwin and the Economy of Nature
Article
John van Wyhe;
(2016)
The impact of A. R. Wallace's Sarawak Law paper reassessed
Article
Joachim L. Dagg;
J. F. Derry;
(2022)
Patrick Matthew's synthesis of catastrophism and transformism
Be the first to comment!