Mill appears to be committed to two incompatible accounts of laws. While he seems to defend a Humean account of laws similar to Ramsey's and Lewis's, he also appears to rely on modal notions to distinguish lawful relations from accidental regularities. This paper will show that Mill's two accounts of laws are in fact equivalent. This equivalence results from a proper understanding of the necessity involved in laws and a proper understanding of systematization. This equivalence reveals the true source of the intimate connection between laws and systematization. Mill also provides an account of natural necessity that makes clear why experimentation is essential for gaining knowledge of laws. In contrast, Lewis's account will be shown to have counterintuitive consequences regarding the relationship between laws and experimentation. Moreover, it will be shown that Mill's views about inference result in a distinction between two modes of systematizing: subsumption and derivation. This distinction is overlooked in contemporary accounts of systematization, but Mill rightly notes that the metaphysical implications and epistemic role of these two modes are importantly different.
...More
Book
Snyder, Laura J.;
(2006)
Reforming Philosophy: A Victorian Debate on Science and Society
(/isis/citation/CBB000741795/)
Article
Cobb, Aaron D.;
(2009)
Michael Faraday's “Historical Sketch of Electro-Magnetism” and the Theory-Dependence of Experimentation
(/isis/citation/CBB001230094/)
Article
Cobb, Aaron D.;
(2011)
History and Scientific Practice in the Construction of an Adequate Philosophy of Science: Revisiting a Whewell/Mill Debate
(/isis/citation/CBB001024143/)
Chapter
Marco Buzzoni;
(2018)
Ernst Mach interprete di Pierre Duhem. Valore e limiti della sperimentazione mentale
(/isis/citation/CBB306281511/)
Chapter
Snyder, Laura J.;
(2009)
Hypotheses in 19th-Century British Philosophy of Science: Herschel, Whewell, Mill
(/isis/citation/CBB001032103/)
Chapter
Scott Edgar;
(2015)
Intersubjectivity and Physical Laws in Post-Kantian Theory of Knowledge: Natorp and Cassirer
(/isis/citation/CBB946748180/)
Chapter
Schickore, Jutta;
(2006)
A Forerunner? Perhaps, but Not to the Context Distinction. William Whewell's Germano-Cantabrigian History of the Fundamental Ideas
(/isis/citation/CBB001033918/)
Book
Dorato, Mauro;
(2005)
The Software of the Universe: An Introduction to the History and Philosophy of Laws of Nature
(/isis/citation/CBB000771896/)
Article
Pessin, Andrew;
(2003)
Descartes' Nomic Concurrentism: Finite Causation and Divine Concurrence
(/isis/citation/CBB000500776/)
Book
Al Coppola;
(2016)
The Theater of Experiment: Staging Natural Philosophy in Eighteenth-Century Britain
(/isis/citation/CBB411795839/)
Book
Lange, Marc;
(2000)
Natural Laws in Scientific Practice
(/isis/citation/CBB000400956/)
Thesis
Cobb, Aaron D.;
(2009)
Explanation and the Epistemic Significance of Experiment in Nineteenth-Century British Philosophy of Science
(/isis/citation/CBB001562872/)
Article
Jelscha Schmid;
(2018)
Schelling's Method of Darstellung: Presenting Nature Through Experiment
(/isis/citation/CBB135945357/)
Book
Hans-Jörg Rheinberger;
(2021)
Spalt und Fuge: Eine Phänomenologie des Experiments
(/isis/citation/CBB142205724/)
Book
Jeremy Shearmur;
Geoffrey Stokes;
(2016)
The Cambridge Companion to Popper
(/isis/citation/CBB403187266/)
Book
Piero Martinetti;
Luca Natali;
(2018)
Le carte di Piero Martinetti
(/isis/citation/CBB915909435/)
Chapter
Massimo Ferrari;
(2015)
Ernst Cassirer and the History of Science
(/isis/citation/CBB001330940/)
Chapter
Meli, Domenico Bertoloni;
(2007)
Experiment in Newton's Principia: The First Edition
(/isis/citation/CBB001032048/)
Article
Pérez Pariente, Joaquín;
(2010)
La alquimia y su relación con la ciencia
(/isis/citation/CBB001201523/)
Article
Morange, Michel;
(2013)
From Experimental Systems to Evolutionary Biology: An Impossible Journey?
(/isis/citation/CBB001211933/)
Be the first to comment!