Article ID: CBB001221676

Mill and Lewis on Laws, Experimentation, and Systematization (2012)

unapi

Mill appears to be committed to two incompatible accounts of laws. While he seems to defend a Humean account of laws similar to Ramsey's and Lewis's, he also appears to rely on modal notions to distinguish lawful relations from accidental regularities. This paper will show that Mill's two accounts of laws are in fact equivalent. This equivalence results from a proper understanding of the necessity involved in laws and a proper understanding of systematization. This equivalence reveals the true source of the intimate connection between laws and systematization. Mill also provides an account of natural necessity that makes clear why experimentation is essential for gaining knowledge of laws. In contrast, Lewis's account will be shown to have counterintuitive consequences regarding the relationship between laws and experimentation. Moreover, it will be shown that Mill's views about inference result in a distinction between two modes of systematizing: subsumption and derivation. This distinction is overlooked in contemporary accounts of systematization, but Mill rightly notes that the metaphysical implications and epistemic role of these two modes are importantly different.

...More
Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB001221676/

Similar Citations

Book Snyder, Laura J.; (2006)
Reforming Philosophy: A Victorian Debate on Science and Society (/isis/citation/CBB000741795/)

Chapter Marco Buzzoni; (2018)
Ernst Mach interprete di Pierre Duhem. Valore e limiti della sperimentazione mentale (/isis/citation/CBB306281511/)

Chapter Snyder, Laura J.; (2009)
Hypotheses in 19th-Century British Philosophy of Science: Herschel, Whewell, Mill (/isis/citation/CBB001032103/)

Article Pessin, Andrew; (2003)
Descartes' Nomic Concurrentism: Finite Causation and Divine Concurrence (/isis/citation/CBB000500776/)

Book Lange, Marc; (2000)
Natural Laws in Scientific Practice (/isis/citation/CBB000400956/)

Article Jelscha Schmid; (2018)
Schelling's Method of Darstellung: Presenting Nature Through Experiment (/isis/citation/CBB135945357/)

Book Hans-Jörg Rheinberger; (2021)
Spalt und Fuge: Eine Phänomenologie des Experiments (/isis/citation/CBB142205724/)

Book Jeremy Shearmur; Geoffrey Stokes; (2016)
The Cambridge Companion to Popper (/isis/citation/CBB403187266/)

Book Piero Martinetti; Luca Natali; (2018)
Le carte di Piero Martinetti (/isis/citation/CBB915909435/)

Chapter Massimo Ferrari; (2015)
Ernst Cassirer and the History of Science (/isis/citation/CBB001330940/)

Chapter Meli, Domenico Bertoloni; (2007)
Experiment in Newton's Principia: The First Edition (/isis/citation/CBB001032048/)

Article Pérez Pariente, Joaquín; (2010)
La alquimia y su relación con la ciencia (/isis/citation/CBB001201523/)

Article Morange, Michel; (2013)
From Experimental Systems to Evolutionary Biology: An Impossible Journey? (/isis/citation/CBB001211933/)

Authors & Contributors
Cobb, Aaron D.
Snyder, Laura J.
Martinetti, Piero
Schmid, Jelscha
Natali, Luca
Geoffrey Stokes
Concepts
Philosophy of science
History of philosophy of science
Experiments and experimentation
Experimental method
Philosophers of science, modern
Methodology of science; scientific method
Time Periods
19th century
18th century
17th century
20th century, early
20th century
Places
Great Britain
Italy
Europe
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment