McManus, Fabrizzio (Author)
Within modern philosophy of biology the topic of mechanistic explanation has become a central theme for critical discussion. The neo-mechanical philosophers have developed accounts that emphasize intervention and manipulation as the central epistemic tools that allow gaining epistemic access upon the mechanisms and have argued that the processes of inter-field integration across disciplines can be understood through the analysis of mechanisms spanning multiple levels. In this paper I revisit current proposals on mechanistic explanation in order to show some of their limitations when dealing with developmental mechanisms. I basically argue that (i) developmental mechanisms cannot be accommodated within a framework centered upon the mutual manipulation principle, (ii) the distinction between causal relations vs. constitutive relations cannot be easily demarcated within developmental biology and (iii) the notion of part underlying the neo-mechanical accounts on explanation is not suitable for developmental biology.
...More
Thesis
Love, Alan Christopher;
(2005)
Explaining Evolutionary Innovation and Novelty: A Historical and Philosophical Study of Biological Concepts
(/isis/citation/CBB001560817/)
Article
Valérie Racine;
(2016)
The mechanistic-holistic divide revisited: The case of the lac operon
(/isis/citation/CBB565749089/)
Article
Chadarevian, Soraya de;
(2000)
Mapping Development, or How Molecular is Molecular Biology?
(/isis/citation/CBB000770053/)
Article
Meunier, Robert;
(2012)
Stages in the Development of a Model Organism as a Platform for Mechanistic Models in Developmental Biology: Zebrafish, 1970--2000
(/isis/citation/CBB001221635/)
Book
Amundson, Ronald;
(2005)
The Changing Role of the Embryo in Evolutionary Thought: Roots of Evo-Devo
(/isis/citation/CBB000550706/)
Article
Davide Vecchi;
(2020)
DNA is not an ontologically distinctive developmental cause
(/isis/citation/CBB782857037/)
Article
Banchetti-Robino, Marina Paola;
(2012)
The Ontological Function of First-Order and Second-Order Corpuscles in the Chemical Philosophy of Robert Boyle: The Redintegration of Potassium Nitrate
(/isis/citation/CBB001210754/)
Article
Michael Fry;
(2020)
Ontologically Simple Theories Do Not Indicate the True Nature of Complex Biological Systems: Three Test Cases
(/isis/citation/CBB515852529/)
Article
Kaitaro, Timo;
(2008)
Can Matter Mark the Hours? Eighteenth-Century Vitalist Materialism and Functional Properties
(/isis/citation/CBB000831762/)
Book
Pierre-Alain Braillard;
Christophe Malaterre;
(2015)
Explanation in Biology: An Enquiry into the Diversity of Explanatory Patterns in the Life Sciences
(/isis/citation/CBB328513685/)
Article
Slowik, Edward;
(2013)
Newton's Neo-Platonic Ontology of Space
(/isis/citation/CBB001320863/)
Article
David Merritt;
(2021)
Cosmological Realism
(/isis/citation/CBB244895079/)
Article
Monton, Bradley;
(2004)
The Problem of Ontology for Spontaneous Collapse Theories
(/isis/citation/CBB000471125/)
Article
Jason Winning;
(2020)
Mechanistic Causation and Constraints: Perspectival Parts and Powers, Non-perspectival Modal Patterns
(/isis/citation/CBB929989718/)
Article
Carl F. Craver;
David M. Kaplan;
(2020)
Are More Details Better? On the Norms of Completeness for Mechanistic Explanations
(/isis/citation/CBB621951199/)
Article
Daniel C. Burnston;
(2016)
Data graphs and mechanistic explanation
(/isis/citation/CBB555220713/)
Article
Pyle, Andrew;
(2002)
Boyle on Science and the Mechanical Philosophy: A Reply to Chalmers
(/isis/citation/CBB000201214/)
Article
Robyn Yucel;
(2018)
Scientists’ Ontological and Epistemological Views about Science from the Perspective of Critical Realism
(/isis/citation/CBB219306053/)
Article
Harker, David;
(2010)
Two Arguments for Scientific Realism Unified
(/isis/citation/CBB001021670/)
Book
Carl Posy;
Yemima Ben-Menahem;
(2023)
Mathematical Knowledge, Objects and Applications: Essays in Memory of Mark Steiner
(/isis/citation/CBB349670710/)
Be the first to comment!