Article ID: CBB001221586

Convenience Experimentation (2012)

unapi

Krohs, Ulrich (Author)


Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences
Volume: 43
Pages: 52--57


Publication Date: 2012
Edition Details: Part of a special section: “Data-Driven Research in the Biological and Biomedical Sciences”
Language: English

Systems biology aims at explaining life processes by means of detailed models of molecular networks, mainly on the whole-cell scale. The whole cell perspective distinguishes the new field of systems biology from earlier approaches within molecular cell biology. The shift was made possible by the high throughput methods that were developed for gathering `omic' (genomic, proteomic, etc.) data. These new techniques are made commercially available as semi-automatic analytic equipment, ready-made analytic kits and probe arrays. There is a whole industry of supplies for what may be called convenience experimentation. My paper inquires some epistemic consequences of strong reliance on convenience experimentation in systems biology. In times when experimentation was automated to a lesser degree, modeling and in part even experimentation could be understood fairly well as either being driven by hypotheses, and thus proceed by the testing of hypothesis, or as being performed in an exploratory mode, intended to sharpen concepts or initially vague phenomena. In systems biology, the situation is dramatically different. Data collection became so easy (though not cheap) that experimentation is, to a high degree, driven by convenience equipment, and model building is driven by the vast amount of data that is produced by convenience experimentation. This results in a shift in the mode of science. The paper shows that convenience driven science is not primarily hypothesis-testing, nor is it in an exploratory mode. It rather proceeds in a gathering mode. This shift demands another shift in the mode of evaluation, which now becomes an exploratory endeavor, in response to the superabundance of gathered data.

...More

Description On “epistemic consequences of strong reliance on convenience experimentation in systems biology.” (from the abstract)


Included in

Article Leonelli, S. (2012) Introduction: Making Sense of Data-Driven Research in the Biological and Biomedical Sciences. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences (p. 1). unapi

Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB001221586/

Similar Citations

Article Leonelli, Sabina; Ankeny, Rachel A.; (2012)
Re-Thinking Organisms: The Impact of Databases on Model Organism Biology (/isis/citation/CBB001221584/)

Chapter Vrishali Subramanian; Sanjay Chandrasekharan; Nancy J. Nersessian; (2012)
Computational Modeling: Is This the End of Thought Experiments in Science? (/isis/citation/CBB739614030/)

Article Keating, Peter; Cambrosio, Alberto; (2012)
Too Many Numbers: Microarrays in Clinical Cancer Research (/isis/citation/CBB001221585/)

Chapter W. Ford Doolittle; (2012)
Craig Venter’s New Life: the Realization of Some Thought Experiments in Biological Ontology (/isis/citation/CBB307106698/)

Article Stephen Boyd Davis; Olivia Vane; Florian Kräutli; (2021)
Can I believe what I see? Data visualization and trust in the humanities (/isis/citation/CBB399002226/)

Thesis Harris, Todd Roberson; (2002)
The construction and manipulation of data models in cell biology (/isis/citation/CBB001562151/)

Article Simon Lohse; (2021)
Scientific inertia in animal-based research in biomedicine (/isis/citation/CBB124857110/)

Book Stevens, Hallam; (2013)
Life out of Sequence: A Data-Driven History of Bioinformatics (/isis/citation/CBB001213157/)

Chapter David Davies; (2012)
Can Philosophical Thought Experiments Be ‘Screened’? (/isis/citation/CBB334225094/)

Chapter Richard T. W. Arthur; (2012)
Can Thought Experiments Be Resolved by Experiment? The Case of Aristotle’s Wheel (/isis/citation/CBB597559409/)

Chapter Julian Reiss; (2012)
Genealogical Thought Experiments in Economics (/isis/citation/CBB482966499/)

Chapter Marco Buzzoni; (2012)
Thought Experiments from a Kantian Point of View (/isis/citation/CBB794939617/)

Authors & Contributors
W. Ford Doolittle
Olivia Vane
Vrishali Subramanian
Kräutli, Florian
Stephen Boyd Davis
Chandrasekharan, Sanjay
Journals
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
Interdisciplinary Science Reviews
History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences
Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences
Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte
Publishers
University of California, Davis
Wiley
University of Chicago Press
Concepts
Biology
Research methods
Data analysis
Epistemology
Experiments and experimentation
Bioinformatics
People
Woese, Carl R.
Venter, J. Craig
Revelle, Roger
Kuhn, Thomas S.
Kant, Immanuel
Aristotle
Time Periods
20th century, late
21st century
20th century
19th century
Places
Europe
Great Britain
Institutions
International Biological Program
Cambridge. University. Laboratory of Molecular Biology
International Geophysical Year (IGY)
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment