Pence, Charles H. (Author)
There are two motivations commonly ascribed to historical actors for taking up statistics: to reduce complicated data to a mean value (e.g., Quetelet), and to take account of diversity (e.g., Galton). Different motivations will, it is assumed, lead to different methodological decisions in the practice of the statistical sciences. Karl Pearson and W. F. R. Weldon are generally seen as following directly in Galton's footsteps. I argue for two related theses in light of this standard interpretation, based on a reading of several sources in which Weldon, independently of Pearson, reflects on his own motivations. First, while Pearson does approach statistics from this Galtonian perspective, he is, consistent with his positivist philosophy of science, utilizing statistics to simplify the highly variable data of biology. Weldon, on the other hand, is brought to statistics by a rich empiricism and a desire to preserve the diversity of biological data. Secondly, we have here a counterexample to the claim that divergence in motivation will lead to a corresponding separation in methodology. Pearson and Weldon, despite embracing biometry for different reasons, settled on precisely the same set of statistical tools for the investigation of evolution.
...More
Article
Nicholas W. Gillham;
(2015)
The Battle Between the Biometricians and the Mendelians: How Sir Francis Galton’s Work Caused his Disciples to Reach Conflicting Conclusions About the Hereditary Mechanism
(/isis/citation/CBB738872407/)
Article
Radick, Gregory;
(2011)
Physics in the Galtonian Sciences of Heredity
(/isis/citation/CBB001023997/)
Article
Rushton, A. R.;
(2000)
Nettleship, Pearson and Bateson: The biometric-Mendelian debate in a medical context
(/isis/citation/CBB000110375/)
Article
Porter, Theodore M.;
(2014)
The Curious Case of Blending Inheritance
(/isis/citation/CBB001420141/)
Book
Rushton, Alan R.;
(2009)
Genetics in Medicine in Great Britain 1600 to 1939
(/isis/citation/CBB001020882/)
Article
Magnello, M. Eileen;
(2009)
Karl Pearson and the Establishment of Mathematical Statistics
(/isis/citation/CBB001033897/)
Article
Charles H. Pence;
(2015)
The Early History of Chance in Evolution
(/isis/citation/CBB068013192/)
Thesis
Pence, Charles H.;
(2014)
Chance in Evolutionary Theory: Fitness, Selection, and Genetic Drift in Philosophical and Historical Perspective
(/isis/citation/CBB001567542/)
Article
Yafeng Shan;
(2021)
Beyond Mendelism and Biometry
(/isis/citation/CBB308136354/)
Chapter
Gayon, Jean;
(2007)
Karl Pearson ou les enjeux du phénoménalisme dans les sciences biologiques vers 1900
(/isis/citation/CBB001022510/)
Article
Nicola Bertoldi;
(2022)
“Batesonian Mendelism” and “Pearsonian biometry”: Shedding new light on the controversy between William Bateson and Karl Pearson
(/isis/citation/CBB173602193/)
Article
Morrison, Margaret;
(2002)
Modelling Populations: Pearson and Fisher on Mendelism and Biometry
(/isis/citation/CBB000200160/)
Article
Aldrich, John;
(2010)
Mathematics in the London/Royal Statistical Society
(/isis/citation/CBB001021434/)
Article
Charnley, Berris;
(2013)
Experiments in Empire-Building: Mendelian Genetics as a National, Imperial, and Global Agricultural Enterprise
(/isis/citation/CBB001211906/)
Article
Edwards, A. W. F.;
(2012)
Punnett's Square
(/isis/citation/CBB001221605/)
Article
Stigler, Stephen M.;
(2008)
Karl Pearson's Theoretical Errors and the Advances They Inspired
(/isis/citation/CBB001035742/)
Article
Garland E. Allen;
(2017)
Mendelism and the Promise of A New Agriculture, 1900-1945
(/isis/citation/CBB500275953/)
Article
Magnello, M. Eileen;
(1996)
Karl Pearson's Gresham lectures: W.F.R. Weldon, speciation, and the origins of Pearsonian statistics
(/isis/citation/CBB000067054/)
Article
Roger J. Wood;
(2015)
Darbishire expands his vision of heredity from Mendelian genetics to inherited memory
(/isis/citation/CBB211130319/)
Article
Tabery, James;
(2008)
R. A. Fisher, Lancelot Hogben, and the Origin(s) of Genotype--Environment Interaction
(/isis/citation/CBB000850683/)
Be the first to comment!