IsisCB Explore

Article ID: CBB001220959

French Roots of French Neo-Lamarckisms, 1879--1985 (2011)

Loison, Laurent (Author)

Journal of the History of Biology
Volume: 44
Pages: 713--744

Outside Links

WorldCat

Google Scholar

JSTOR

Academia.edu

Philosophy of biology Lamarckism Biology Philosophy of science Evolution Mechanism; mechanical philosophy Vitalism 20th century 19th century France

This essay attempts to describe the neo-Lamarckian atmosphere that was dominant in French biology for more than a century. Firstly, we demonstrate that there were not one but at least two French neo-Lamarckian traditions. This implies, therefore, that it is possible to propose a clear definition of a (neo)Lamarckian conception, and by using it, to distinguish these two traditions. We will see that these two conceptions were not dominant at the same time. The first French neo-Lamarckism (1879--1931) was structured by a very mechanic view of natural processes. The main representatives of this first period were scientists such as Alfred Giard (1846--1908), Gaston Bonnier (1853--1922) and Félix Le Dantec (1869--1917). The second Lamarckism -- much more vitalist in its inspiration -- started to develop under the supervision of people such as Albert Vandel (1894--1980) and Pierre-Paul Grassé (1895--1985). Secondly, this essay suggests that the philosophical inclinations of these neo-Lamarckisms reactivated a very ancient and strong dichotomy of French thought. One part of this dichotomy is a material, physicalist tradition, which started with René Descartes but developed extensively during the 18th and 19th centuries. The other is a spiritual and vitalist reaction to the first one, which also had a very long history, though it is most closely associated with the work of Henri Bergson. Through Claude Bernard, the first neo-Lamarckians tried to construct a mechanical and determinist form of evolutionary theory which was, in effect, a Cartesian theory. The second wave of neo-Lamarckians wanted to reconsider the autonomy and reactivity of life forms, in contrast to purely physical systems.

...More

Citation URI

http://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB001220959/

Citations Indexes

Similar Citations

Article Poreau, Brice; (2011)
Commensalisme, mutualisme, parasitisme, une preuve de l'Evolution pour Etienne Rabaud? (/isis/citation/CBB001220813/)

Article Rieppel, Olivier; (2012)
Karl Beurlen (1901--1985), Nature Mysticism, and Aryan Paleontology (/isis/citation/CBB001221003/)

Chapter Ruse, Michael; (2004)
Adaptive Landscapes and Dynamic Equilibrium: The Spencerian Contribution to Twentieth-Century American Evolutionary Biology (/isis/citation/CBB000520042/)

Article Smit, Harry; (2010)
Weismann, Wittgenstein and the Homunculus Fallacy (/isis/citation/CBB001023966/)

Essay Review Tatjana Buklijas; (2018)
Life Reconsidered (/isis/citation/CBB581106067/)

Article Allen, Garland E.; (2005)
Mechanism, Vitalism and Organicism in Late Nineteenth- and Twentieth-Century Biology: The Importance of Historical Context (/isis/citation/CBB000770690/)

Article Jean Gayon; Richard M. Burian; Laurent Loison; (2017)
The Contributions – and Collapse – of Lamarckian Heredity in Pasteurian Molecular Biology: 1. Lysogeny, 1900–1960 (/isis/citation/CBB496049162/)

Article Snait B. Gissis; (2023)
The Neo-Lamarckian Tools Deployed by the Young Durkheim: 1882–1892 (/isis/citation/CBB708515471/)

Chapter Loison, Laurent; (2011)
The Notions of Plasticity and Heredity among French Neo-Lamarckians (1880--1940): From Complementarity to Incompatibility (/isis/citation/CBB001500086/)

Book Erik L. Peterson; (2017)
The Life Organic: The Theoretical Biology Club and the Roots of Epigenetics (/isis/citation/CBB675901053/)

Book Loison, Laurent; Morange, Michel; (2010)
Qu'est-ce que le néolamarckisme? Les biologistes français et la question de l'évolution des espèces: 1870--1940 (/isis/citation/CBB001231944/)

Article Bechtel, William; (2010)
The Cell: Locus or Object of Inquiry? (/isis/citation/CBB001023957/)

Article Ute Deichmann; (2016)
Why epigenetics is not a vindication of Lamarckism – and why that matters (/isis/citation/CBB175338819/)

Article Erik L. Peterson; Crystal Hall; (2022)
“What is Dead May Not Die”: Locating Marginalized Concepts Among Ordinary Biologists (/isis/citation/CBB576856882/)

Essay Review Bock, Walter J.; (2000)
Towards a New Metaphysics: The Need for an Enlarged Philosophy of Science (/isis/citation/CBB000110319/)

Article Isabel Gabel; (2018)
La biologie, la réflexivité et l’histoire : Réinscrire Canguilhem dans son milieu (/isis/citation/CBB085805175/)

Article Jessica Riskin; (2020)
Biology’s mistress, a brief history (/isis/citation/CBB880456753/)

Book Christopher Donohue; Charles T. Wolfe; (2023)
Vitalism and Its Legacy in Twentieth Century Life Sciences and Philosophy (/isis/citation/CBB947852171/)

Book Brzezinski Prestes, Maria Elice; Martins, Lilian Al-Chueyr Pereira; Stefano, Waldir; (2006)
Filosofia e História da Biologia 1 (/isis/citation/CBB000820181/)

Article Tarquin Holmes; (2017)
The wild type as concept and in experimental practice: A history of its role in classical genetics and evolutionary theory (/isis/citation/CBB016897194/)