IsisCB Explore

Article ID: CBB001213711

Finding Ernst Mayr's Plato (2013)

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences
Volume: 44, no. 4B
Issue: 4B
Pages: 714-723

Outside Links

WorldCat

Google Scholar

JSTOR

Academia.edu

Philosophy of biology Platonism Essentialism Biology Species concept (biology) 20th century Mayr, Ernst Plato

Many biologists have accepted Ernst Mayr's claim that evolutionary biology undermined an essentialist or typological view of species that had its roots in Platonic philosophy. However, Mayr has been accused of failing to support with textual evidence his attributions to Plato of these sorts of views about biology. Contemporary work in history and philosophy of biology often seems to take onboard Mayr's account of Plato's view of species. This paper seeks to provide a critical account of putative inconsistencies between an evolutionary view of species and Platonic philosophy with renewed attention to the Platonic texts in light of recent Plato scholarship; I argue that claims that Plato held an essentialist view of species inconsistent with evolutionary biology are inadequately supported by textual evidence. If Mayr's essentialist thesis fails, one might think that the intuition that Platonic philosophy is in tension with Darwinian evolution could nonetheless be accounted for by Plato's apparent privileging of a certain sort of teleological explanation, a thesis that Mayr suggests in his 1959 paper on Louis Agassiz. However, this thesis also faces difficulties. Ernst Mayr's Plato is more likely to be found in the writings of anti-evolutionary 19th century biologists like Mayr's frequent target, Agassiz, than in a cautious reading of the Platonic dialogues themselves. Interlocutors in discussions of the history of biological thought and classificatory methods in biology should be cautious in ascribing views about biology to Plato and using terms like Platonic essentialism.

...More

Citation URI

https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB001213711/

Citations Indexes

Similar Citations

Chapter Thompson, Paul; (2000)
“Organization,” “Population,” and Mayr's Rejection of Essentialism in Biology (/isis/citation/CBB000410688/)

Chapter Massimo Bernardi; Adriana Bellati; Michele Menegon; (2015)
La specie tra evoluzione e conservazione (/isis/citation/CBB690125746/)

Article Mallet, James; (2010)
Why Was Darwin's View of Species Rejected by Twentieth Century Biologists? (/isis/citation/CBB001252809/)

Article Li, Jianhui; (2009)
What Does Evolutionary Science Provide for Contemporary Philosophy? On Ernst Mayr's “New Philosophy of Biology” (/isis/citation/CBB001024104/)

Article Junker, Thomas; (2007)
Ernst Mayr (1904--2005) and the New Philosophy of Biology (/isis/citation/CBB001230073/)

Article Stamos, David N.; (2002)
Species, Languages, and the Horizontal/Vertical Distinction (/isis/citation/CBB000200252/)

Article Deleporte, Pierre; (2012)
The Systemist Emergentist View of Mahner and Bunge on “Species as Individuals”: What Use for Science and Education (/isis/citation/CBB001252234/)

Article Winsor, Mary P.; (2006)
The Creation of the Essentialism Story: An Exercise in Metahistory (/isis/citation/CBB000774679/)

Article Pedroso, Makmiller; (2012)
Essentialism, History, and Biological Taxa (/isis/citation/CBB001221601/)

Article Nash, Richard; (2015)
William Keith Brooks and the Naturalist's Defense of Darwinism in the Late-Nineteenth Century (/isis/citation/CBB001510220/)

Article Ariew, André; (2003)
Ernst Mayr's “Ultimate/Proximate” Distinction Reconsidered and Reconstructed (/isis/citation/CBB000340589/)

Article Reydon, Thomas A. C.; (2005)
On the Nature of the Species Problem and the Four Meanings of `Species' (/isis/citation/CBB000501587/)

Book Ayala, Francisco José; Arp, Robert; (2010)
Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology (/isis/citation/CBB001032775/)

Article Reydon, Thomas A. C.; (2003)
Discussion: Species Are Individuals; Or Are They? (/isis/citation/CBB000410818/)

Article Stijn Conix; (2019)
Radical pluralism, classificatory norms and the legitimacy of species classifications (/isis/citation/CBB345206372/)

Article Chung, Carl; (2003)
On the Origin of the Typological/Population Distinction in Ernst Mayr's Changing Views of Species, 1942--1959 (/isis/citation/CBB000340811/)

Article Brandon A. Conley; (2019)
Mayr and Tinbergen: disentangling and integrating (/isis/citation/CBB308076732/)

Article José Luis González Recio; (2005)
Ernst Mayr (1904-2005): de la teoría sintética de la evolución a la filosofía de la Biología (/isis/citation/CBB035558864/)

Article Richard McMahon; (2020)
Resurecting raciology? Genetic ethnology and pre-1945 anthropological race classification (/isis/citation/CBB086533805/)

Article Joeri Witteveen; (2015)
“A temporary oversimplification”: Mayr, Simpson, Dobzhansky, and the origins of the typology/population dichotomy (part 1 of 2) (/isis/citation/CBB858547415/)

Comments

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}