Müller-Wille, Staffan (Author)
A famous debate between John Ray, Joseph Pitton de Tournefort and Augustus Quirinus Rivinus at the end of the seventeenth century has often been referred to as signalling the beginning of a rift between classificatory methods relying on logical division and classificatory methods relying on empirical grouping. Interestingly, a couple of decades later, Linnaeus showed very little excitement in reviewing this debate, and this although he was the first to introduce the terminological distinction of artificial vs. natural methods. In this paper, I will explain Linnaeus's indifference by the fact that earlier debates were revolving around problems of plant diagnosis rather than classification. From Linnaeus's perspective, they were therefore concerned with what he called artificial methods alone -- diagnostic tools, that is, which were artificial no matter which characters were taken into account. The natural method Linnaeus proposed, on the other hand, was not about diagnosis, but about relations of equivalence which played a vital, although largely implicit role in the practices of specimen exchange on which naturalists relied to acquire knowledge of the natural world.
...MoreArticle Smith, Justin E. H.; Delbourgo, James (2013) In Kind: Species of Exchange in Early Modern Science. Annals of Science: The History of Science and Technology (pp. 299-304).
Chapter
Lherminier, Philippe;
(2008)
Une seule classification ou des classifications différentes et disjointes pour chaque règne?
(/isis/citation/CBB001221148/)
Article
Müller-Wille, Staffan;
Charmantier, Isabelle;
(2012)
Natural History and Information Overload: The Case of Linnaeus
(/isis/citation/CBB001221582/)
Article
Breidbach, Olaf;
Ghiselin, Michael T.;
(2006)
Baroque Classification: A Missing Chapter in the History of Systematics
(/isis/citation/CBB000933663/)
Article
Müller-Wille, S.;
(2013)
Systems and How Linnaeus Looked at Them in Retrospect
(/isis/citation/CBB001320280/)
Article
Baytop, Asuman;
(2012)
J. V. Aznavur (1861--1920), stanbul Bitkileri Koleksiyonu ve Yayinlari
(/isis/citation/CBB001320505/)
Chapter
Rupke, Nicolaas;
(2008)
The Origin of Species from Linnaeus to Darwin
(/isis/citation/CBB000953673/)
Article
Gregory J. Morgan;
(2016)
What is a virus species? Radical pluralism in viral taxonomy
(/isis/citation/CBB950706395/)
Article
Allgayer, Heloisa;
(2013)
O conceito darwiniano de espécie: um argumento favorável à seleção natural na Origem das espécies
(/isis/citation/CBB001214012/)
Article
Richards, Robert J.;
(2012)
Darwin's Principles of Divergence and Natural Selection: Why Fodor Was Almost Right
(/isis/citation/CBB001221609/)
Article
Sandy C. Boucher;
(2017)
Gould on species, metaphysics and macroevolution: A critical appraisal
(/isis/citation/CBB083237950/)
Chapter
Selosse, Philippe;
(2008)
Les concepts de genre et d'espèce á travers l'évolution du modèle logique de la définition, de l'Antiquité à Linné
(/isis/citation/CBB001221146/)
Book
Richards, Richard A.;
(2010)
The Species Problem: A Philosophical Analysis
(/isis/citation/CBB001023159/)
Article
Krementsov, Nikolai;
(2007)
A Particular Synthesis: Aleksandr Promptov and Speciation in Birds
(/isis/citation/CBB000773239/)
Article
Johnson, Kristin;
(2004)
The Tail End of the Moth: Clarifying Species Boundaries
(/isis/citation/CBB000610171/)
Article
Stijn Conix;
(2019)
Radical pluralism, classificatory norms and the legitimacy of species classifications
(/isis/citation/CBB345206372/)
Article
Aaron Novick;
W. Ford Doolittle;
(2021)
‘Species’ without species
(/isis/citation/CBB782782852/)
Article
Haufe, Chris;
(2012)
Darwin's Laws
(/isis/citation/CBB001221610/)
Article
LaPorte, Joseph;
(2003)
Does a Type Specimen Necessarily or Contingently Belong to Its Species?
(/isis/citation/CBB000340591/)
Book
Wilkins, John S.;
(2009)
Species: A History of the Idea
(/isis/citation/CBB001230408/)
Article
Ellis, W. Mark;
(2011)
The Problem with the Species Problem
(/isis/citation/CBB001250034/)
Be the first to comment!