IsisCB Explore

Article ID: CBB001213475

Systems and How Linnaeus Looked at Them in Retrospect (2013)

Annals of Science: The History of Science and Technology
Volume: 70, no. 3
Issue: 3
Pages: 305-317

Publication Date: 2013
Edition Details: Part of a special issue, “In Kind: Species of Exchange in Early Modern Science”
Language: English

Outside Links

WorldCat

Google Scholar

JSTOR

Academia.edu

A famous debate between John Ray, Joseph Pitton de Tournefort and Augustus Quirinus Rivinus at the end of the seventeenth century has often been referred to as signalling the beginning of a rift between classificatory methods relying on logical division and classificatory methods relying on empirical grouping. Interestingly, a couple of decades later, Linnaeus showed very little excitement in reviewing this debate, and this although he was the first to introduce the terminological distinction of artificial vs. natural methods. In this paper, I will explain Linnaeus's indifference by the fact that earlier debates were revolving around problems of plant diagnosis rather than classification. From Linnaeus's perspective, they were therefore concerned with what he called artificial methods alone -- diagnostic tools, that is, which were artificial no matter which characters were taken into account. The natural method Linnaeus proposed, on the other hand, was not about diagnosis, but about relations of equivalence which played a vital, although largely implicit role in the practices of specimen exchange on which naturalists relied to acquire knowledge of the natural world.

...More

Included in

Article Smith, Justin E. H.; Delbourgo, James (2013) In Kind: Species of Exchange in Early Modern Science. Annals of Science: The History of Science and Technology (pp. 299-304). unapi

Citation URI

https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB001213475/

Citations Indexes

Similar Citations

Chapter Lherminier, Philippe; (2008)
Une seule classification ou des classifications différentes et disjointes pour chaque règne? (/isis/citation/CBB001221148/)

Article Müller-Wille, Staffan; Charmantier, Isabelle; (2012)
Natural History and Information Overload: The Case of Linnaeus (/isis/citation/CBB001221582/)

Article Breidbach, Olaf; Ghiselin, Michael T.; (2006)
Baroque Classification: A Missing Chapter in the History of Systematics (/isis/citation/CBB000933663/)

Article Müller-Wille, S.; (2013)
Systems and How Linnaeus Looked at Them in Retrospect (/isis/citation/CBB001320280/)

Article Ellis, W. Mark; (2011)
The Problem with the Species Problem (/isis/citation/CBB001250034/)

Chapter Rupke, Nicolaas; (2008)
The Origin of Species from Linnaeus to Darwin (/isis/citation/CBB000953673/)

Article Baytop, Asuman; (2012)
J. V. Aznavur (1861--1920), stanbul Bitkileri Koleksiyonu ve Yayinlari (/isis/citation/CBB001320505/)

Book Richards, Richard A.; (2010)
The Species Problem: A Philosophical Analysis (/isis/citation/CBB001023159/)

Article Johnson, Kristin; (2004)
The Tail End of the Moth: Clarifying Species Boundaries (/isis/citation/CBB000610171/)

Article Winsor, Mary Pickard; (2000)
Species, Demes, and the Omega Taxonomy: Gilmour and The New Systematics (/isis/citation/CBB000111934/)

Article Krementsov, Nikolai; (2007)
A Particular Synthesis: Aleksandr Promptov and Speciation in Birds (/isis/citation/CBB000773239/)

Article Gregory J. Morgan; (2016)
What is a virus species? Radical pluralism in viral taxonomy (/isis/citation/CBB950706395/)

Book Wilkins, John S.; (2009)
Species: A History of the Idea (/isis/citation/CBB001230408/)

Article Sandy C. Boucher; (2017)
Gould on species, metaphysics and macroevolution: A critical appraisal (/isis/citation/CBB083237950/)

Article Richards, Robert J.; (2012)
Darwin's Principles of Divergence and Natural Selection: Why Fodor Was Almost Right (/isis/citation/CBB001221609/)

Chapter Selosse, Philippe; (2008)
Les concepts de genre et d'espèce á travers l'évolution du modèle logique de la définition, de l'Antiquité à Linné (/isis/citation/CBB001221146/)

Article Stijn Conix; (2019)
Radical pluralism, classificatory norms and the legitimacy of species classifications (/isis/citation/CBB345206372/)

Article Aaron Novick; W. Ford Doolittle; (2021)
‘Species’ without species (/isis/citation/CBB782782852/)

Article Haufe, Chris; (2012)
Darwin's Laws (/isis/citation/CBB001221610/)

Article LaPorte, Joseph; (2003)
Does a Type Specimen Necessarily or Contingently Belong to Its Species? (/isis/citation/CBB000340591/)

Comments

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}