Gannett, Lisa (Author)
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences
Volume: 44, no. 3
Issue: 3
Pages: 250-261
The use of `race' as a proxy for population structure in the genetic mapping of complex traits has provoked controversy about its legitimacy as a category for biomedical research, given its social and political connotations. The controversy has reignited debates among scientists and philosophers of science about whether there is a legitimate biological concept of race. This paper examines the genetic race concept as it developed historically in the work of Theodosius Dobzhansky from the 1930s to 1950s. Dobzhansky's definitions of race changed over this time from races as `arrays of forms' or `clusters' in 1933--1939, to races as genetically distinct geographical populations in 1940--1946, to races as genetically distinct `Mendelian populations' in 1947--1955. Dobzhansky responded to nominalist challenges by appealing to the biological reality of race as a process. This response came into tension with the object ontology of race that was implied by Dobzhansky's increasingly holistic treatment of Mendelian populations, a tension, the paper argues, he failed to appreciate or resolve.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
Guido Barbujani;
(2017)
What Genetics Has to Say about Racial Categorization of Humans
Article
Lipphardt, Veronika;
(2013)
Isolates and Crosses in Human Population Genetics; Or, A Contextualization of German Race Science
Article
Glick, Thomas F.;
(2008)
O Programa Brasileiro de genética evolucionária de populações, de Theodosius Dobzhansky
Article
Cameron Brinitzer;
(2024)
Historicizing the liberal antiracism of Cultural Evolution
Book
Cassata, Francesco;
O'Loughlin, Erin;
(2010)
Building the New Man: Eugenics, Racial Science and Genetics in Twentieth-Century Italy
Article
Tito Brige de Carvalho;
(2020)
Modern Evolutionary Biology and Brazilian Population Genetics: Theodosius Dobzhansky at the University of São Paulo
Article
José Franco Monte Sião;
Lilian Al-Chueyr Pereira Martins;
(2020)
Dobzhansky and Dreyfus’s Group: The Introduction of Natural Population Genetics Studies in Brazil (1943–1960)
Article
Michael J. Montoya;
(2007)
Bioethnic Conscription: Genes, Race, and Mexicana/o Ethnicity in Diabetes Research
Article
Clarence C. Gravlee;
(2009)
How Race Becomes Biology: Embodiment of Social Inequality
Thesis
Aleia Clark Fobia;
(2016)
Investigating the Postwar Decline of Race in Science: Race, Science, and Immunology
Article
Mercer, Jean;
(2011)
The Concept of Psychological Regression: Metaphors, Mapping, Queen Square, and Tavistock Square
Article
Paul Lawrence Farber;
(2016)
Dobzhansky and Montagu’s Debate on Race: The Aftermath
Article
Ehud Lamm;
(2015)
Systems Thinking Versus Population Thinking: Genotype Integration and Chromosomal Organization 1930s–1950s
Article
Mallet, James;
(2010)
Why Was Darwin's View of Species Rejected by Twentieth Century Biologists?
Book
Brush, Stephen G.;
(2009)
Choosing Selection: The Revival of Natural Selection in Anglo-American Evolutionary Biology, 1930--1970
Article
Wolfe, Audra J.;
(2010)
What Does It Mean to Go Public? The American Response to Lysenkoism, Reconsidered
Book
Kolchinskii, E. I.;
Manoilenko, K. V.;
Konashev, M. B.;
(2002)
U istokov akademicheskoi genetiki v Sankt-Peterburge
Article
Graziela Santos, Cintia;
Pereira Martins, Lilian Al-Chueyr;
(2013)
Theodosius Dobzhansky e as relações entre genética e evolução
Article
Rudge, David Wÿss;
(2000)
The Complementary Roles of Observation and Experiment: Theodosius Dobzhansky's Genetics of Natural Populations IX and XII
Article
Mikhail B. Konashev;
(2019)
Th. Dobzhansky and the Development of Evolutionary Biology in the USSR
Be the first to comment!