(Never) Mind Your p's and q's: Von Neumann versus Jordan on the Foundations of Quantum Theory (2013)
Duncan, A. (Author)
Janssen, M. (Author)
European Physical Journal H
Volume: 38, no. 2
Issue: 2
Pages: 175-259
In 1927, in two papers entitled On a new foundation [Neue Begründung] of quantum mechanics, Pascual Jordan presented his version of what came to be known as the Dirac-Jordan statistical transformation theory. Jordan and Paul Dirac arrived at essentially the same theory independently of one another at around the same time. Later in 1927, partly in response to Jordan and Dirac and avoiding the mathematical difficulties facing their approach, John von Neumann developed the modern Hilbert space formalism of quantum mechanics. We focus on Jordan and von Neumann. Central to the formalisms of both are expressions for conditional probabilities of finding some value for one quantity given the value of another. Beyond that Jordan and von Neumann had very different views about the appropriate formulation of problems in quantum mechanics. For Jordan, unable to let go of the analogy to classical mechanics, the solution of such problems required the identification of sets of canonically conjugate variables, i.e., p's and q's. For von Neumann, not constrained by the analogy to classical mechanics, it required only the identification of a maximal set of commuting operators with simultaneous eigenstates. He had no need for p's and q's. Jordan and von Neumann also stated the characteristic new rules for probabilities in quantum mechanics somewhat differently. Jordan and Dirac were the first to state those rules in full generality. Von Neumann rephrased them and, in a paper published a few months later, sought to derive them from more basic considerations. In this paper we reconstruct the central arguments of these 1927 papers by Jordan and von Neumann and of a paper on Jordan's approach by Hilbert, von Neumann, and Nordheim. We highlight those elements in these papers that bring out the gradual loosening of the ties between the new quantum formalism and classical mechanics.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
Lacki, Jan;
(2000)
The Early Axiomatizations of Quantum Mechanics: Jordan, von Neumann and the Continuation of Hilbert's Program
(/isis/citation/CBB000740282/)
Article
Walter Dittrich;
(2015)
The Cofounder of Quantum Field Theory: Pascual Jordan
(/isis/citation/CBB848309691/)
Article
Jammer, Max;
(1984)
Pascual Jordan und die Entwicklung der Quantenphysik
(/isis/citation/CBB000003733/)
Article
Freire, Olival, Jr.;
Leyla Joaquim;
Charbel N. El-Hani;
(2015)
Quantum Explorers: Bohr, Jordan, and Delbrück Venturing into Biology
(/isis/citation/CBB446852324/)
Chapter
Wise, M. Norton;
(1994)
Pascual Jordan: Quantum mechanics, psychology, National Socialism
(/isis/citation/CBB000028982/)
Article
Schroer, B.;
(2011)
Pascual Jordan's Legacy and the Ongoing Research in Quantum Field Theory
(/isis/citation/CBB001033785/)
Article
Becker, Lon;
(2004)
That von Neumann Did Not Believe in a Physical Collapse
(/isis/citation/CBB000410750/)
Thesis
Ryan William Dahn;
(2019)
The Forgotten Founder of Quantum Mechanics: The Science and Politics of Physicist Pascual Jordan, 1902–1980
(/isis/citation/CBB787445124/)
Article
Bagge, Erich;
(1978)
Pascual Jordan und die Quantenphysik
(/isis/citation/CBB000028094/)
Article
Beyler, Richard H.;
(1996)
Targeting the organism: The scientific and cultural context of Pascual Jordan's quantum biology, 1932-1947
(/isis/citation/CBB000069656/)
Article
Henderson, Leah;
(2003)
The von Neumann Entropy: A Reply to Shenker
(/isis/citation/CBB000410726/)
Article
Bernardini, Paolo;
(1981)
Pascual Jordan, interprete coerente dell'ipotesi quantistica
(/isis/citation/CBB000013017/)
Article
Beller, Mara;
(1985)
Pascual Jordan's influence on the discovery of Heisenberg's indeterminancy principle
(/isis/citation/CBB000048374/)
Book
Rédei, Miklós;
Stöltzner, Michael;
(2001)
John von Neumann and the Foundations of Quantum Physics
(/isis/citation/CBB000100737/)
Chapter
Krips, Henry;
(1995)
Rhetoic, ideology, and desire in von Neumann's Gründlagen
(/isis/citation/CBB000067323/)
Chapter
Bitsakis, Eftichios;
(1997)
On the validity of von Neumann's theorem
(/isis/citation/CBB000075706/)
Article
Henderson, James R.;
(2010)
Classes of Copenhagen Interpretations: Mechanisms of Collapse as Typologically Determinative
(/isis/citation/CBB001024196/)
Article
Rédei, Miklós;
(1996)
Why John von Neumann did not like the Hilbert space formalism of quantum mechanics (and what he liked instead)
(/isis/citation/CBB000072528/)
Chapter
Pinch, Trevor J.;
(1977)
What does a proof do if it does not prove? A study of the social conditions and metaphysical divisions leading to David Bohm and John von Neumann failing to communicate in quantum physics
(/isis/citation/CBB000025053/)
Article
Herzenberg, Caroline L.;
(2008)
Speaking of Lessons from the History of Science, Does the Name “Hermann” Ring a Bell?
(/isis/citation/CBB001320914/)
Be the first to comment!