The Value of Epistemic Disagreement in Scientific Practice: The Case of Homo Floresiensis (2013)
Cruz, Helen De (Author)
De Smedt, Johan (Author)
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
Volume: 44, no. 2
Issue: 2
Pages: 169-177
Epistemic peer disagreement raises interesting questions, both in epistemology and in philosophy of science. When is it reasonable to defer to the opinion of others, and when should we hold fast to our original beliefs? What can we learn from the fact that an epistemic peer disagrees with us? A question that has received relatively little attention in these debates is the value of epistemic peer disagreement -- can it help us to further epistemic goals, and, if so, how? We investigate this through a recent case in paleoanthropology: the debate on the taxonomic status of Homo floresiensis remains unresolved, with some authors arguing the fossils represent a novel hominin species, and others claiming that they are Homo sapiens with congenital growth disorders. Our examination of this case in the recent history of science provides insights into the value of peer disagreement, indicating that it is especially valuable if one does not straightaway defer to a peer's conclusions, but nevertheless remains open to a peer's evidence and arguments. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
François Lê;
Anne-Sandrine Paumier;
(2016)
Préface
(/isis/citation/CBB266125760/)
Article
François Lê;
Anne-Sandrine Paumier;
(2016)
De la science comme classification à la classification comme pratique scientifique : quelques réflexions à partir de deux cas mathématiques
(/isis/citation/CBB083672582/)
Book
Huneman, Philippe;
Lambert, Gérard;
Silberstein, Marc;
(2015)
Classification, Disease, and Evidence: New Essays in the Philosophy of Medicine
(/isis/citation/CBB001510440/)
Book
Gimbel, Steven;
(2011)
Exploring the Scientific Method: Cases and Questions
(/isis/citation/CBB001250400/)
Book
Christie, Maureen;
(2001)
The Ozone Layer: A Philosophy of Science Perspective
(/isis/citation/CBB000102429/)
Article
Nokuthula Hlabangane;
(2018)
Can a Methodology Subvert the Logics of its Principal? Decolonial Meditations
(/isis/citation/CBB850243377/)
Book
Parsons, Keith M.;
(2014)
It Started with Copernicus: Vital Questions about Science
(/isis/citation/CBB001510107/)
Article
Lena Zuchowski;
(2019)
Modelling and knowledge transfer in complexity science
(/isis/citation/CBB732848503/)
Essay Review
Kevin McCain;
(2018)
Indispensable Falsehoods
(/isis/citation/CBB218621435/)
Book
Lorenzo Magnani;
Tommaso Bertolotti;
(2017)
Springer Handbook of Model-Based Science
(/isis/citation/CBB558667543/)
Article
Cleland, Carol E.;
(2002)
Methodological and Epistemic Differences between Historical Science and Experimental Science
(/isis/citation/CBB000300401/)
Article
Potochnik, Angela;
(2012)
Feminist Implications of Model-Based Science
(/isis/citation/CBB001221696/)
Book
Magnani, Lorenzo;
Nersessian, Nancy J.;
(2002)
Model Based Reasoning: Science, Technology, Values
(/isis/citation/CBB000201255/)
Chapter
Hon, Giora;
(2009)
Error: The Long Neglect, the One-Sided View, and a Typology
(/isis/citation/CBB001020625/)
Article
Kuhle, Matthias;
Kuhle, Sabine;
(2010)
Connecting Information with Scientific Method: Darwin's Significance for Epistemology
(/isis/citation/CBB001230058/)
Article
Gelfert, Axel;
(2011)
Model-Based Representation in Scientific Practice: New Perspectives
(/isis/citation/CBB001024167/)
Article
Otero, Mario H.;
(2011)
Apuntes sobre la “bancarrota” de la ciencia circa 1900
(/isis/citation/CBB001220804/)
Book
Kevin McCain;
(2022)
Understanding How Science Explains the World
(/isis/citation/CBB234676820/)
Article
Chris Walker;
(2019)
Karl Jaspers and Karl Popper: the shared legacy
(/isis/citation/CBB353883243/)
Book
Schatzki, Theodore R.;
Cetina, Karin Knorr;
Savigny, Eike von;
(2001)
The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory
(/isis/citation/CBB000102119/)
Be the first to comment!