The paper explores the existential import of universal affirmative in Descartes, Arnauld and Malebranche. Descartes holds, inconsistently, that eternal truths are true even if the subject term is empty but that a proposition with a false idea as subject is false. Malebranche extends Descartes' truth-conditions for eternal truths, which lack existential import, to all knowledge, allowing only for non-propositional knowledge of contingent existence. Malebranche's rather implausible Neoplatonic semantics is detailed as consisting of three key semantic relations: illumination by which God's ideas cause mental terms, creation by which God's ideas cause material substances by a kind of `ontic privation', and sensation in which brain events occasion states of mental awareness. In contrast, Arnauld distinguishes two types of propositions -- necessary and contingent -- with distinct truth-conditions, one with and one without existential import. Arnauld's more modern semantics is laid out as a theory of reference that substitutes earlier causal accounts with one that adapts the medieval notion of objective being. His version anticipates modern notions of intentional content and appeals in its ontology only to substances and their modes.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
Cook, Monte;
(1996)
Descartes and the dustbin of the mind
(/isis/citation/CBB000067579/)
Article
Raphaële Andrault;
(2018)
The Mind–Body Problem and the Role of Pain: Cross-Fire Between Leibniz and His Cartesian Readers
(/isis/citation/CBB247713160/)
Book
Jolley, Nicholas;
(2013)
Causality and Mind: Essays on Early Modern Philosophy
(/isis/citation/CBB001553076/)
Article
Marleen Rozemond;
(2016)
Descartes, Malebranche and Leibniz: Conceptions of Substance in Arguments for the Immateriality of the Soul
(/isis/citation/CBB117763212/)
Article
Ott, Walter;
(2008)
Régis's Scholastic Mechanism
(/isis/citation/CBB000930744/)
Book
Kremer, Elmar J.;
(1994)
The great Arnauld and some of his philosophical correspondents
(/isis/citation/CBB000063890/)
Article
Lolordo, Antonia;
(2005)
Descartes and Malebranche on Thought, Sensation, and the Nature of the Mind
(/isis/citation/CBB000670339/)
Article
Cook, Monte;
(1991)
Malebranche versus Arnauld
(/isis/citation/CBB000029119/)
Thesis
Black, Andrew G.;
(1992)
Occasionalism in the Malebranche-Arnauld debate
(/isis/citation/CBB001564471/)
Article
Ganault, Joël;
(1992)
Les contraintes métaphysiques de la polémique d'Arnauld et Malebranche sur les idées
(/isis/citation/CBB000053285/)
Article
Watson, Richard A.;
(1994)
Malebranche and Arnauld on ideas
(/isis/citation/CBB000053351/)
Article
Marcialis, Maria Teresa;
(1989)
“Species”, percezioni e idee tra Sei e Settecento
(/isis/citation/CBB000065525/)
Article
Ariew, Roger;
(2006)
Descartes, the First Cartesians, and Logic
(/isis/citation/CBB001021786/)
Article
Goyet, Francis;
(2005)
La Dispositio de l'épichérème: un exemple chez Descartes (Discours de la méthode, II, § 1--4)
(/isis/citation/CBB000670805/)
Article
Ariew, Roger;
(2005)
Descartes, les premiers Cartésiens et la logique
(/isis/citation/CBB001021784/)
Thesis
Doyle, Bret J. Lalumia;
(2006)
The Logic of Descartes' Scientific Method in the “Rules,” “Geometry,” and “Optics”
(/isis/citation/CBB001561645/)
Book
Rossi, Paolo;
(2000)
Logic and the Art of Memory: The Quest for a Universal Language
(/isis/citation/CBB000101788/)
Article
Martin, John N.;
(2013)
Distributive Terms, Truth, and the Port Royal Logic
(/isis/citation/CBB001212144/)
Book
Schmaltz, Tad M.;
(2002)
Radical Cartesianism: The French Reception of Descartes
(/isis/citation/CBB000302043/)
Book
Ariew, Roger;
Grene, Marjorie;
(1995)
Descartes and his contemporaries: Meditations, objections, and replies
(/isis/citation/CBB000068303/)
Be the first to comment!