When it comes to Wittgenstein's philosophy of mathematics, even sympathetic admirers are cowed into submission by the many criticisms of influential authors in that field. They say something to the effect that Wittgenstein does not know enough about or have enough respect for mathematics, to take him as a serious philosopher of mathematics. They claim to catch Wittgenstein pooh-poohing the modern set-theoretic extensional conception of a real number. This article, however, will show that Wittgenstein's criticism is well grounded. A real number, as an `extension', is a homeless fiction; `homeless' in that it neither is supported by anything nor supports anything. The picture of a real number as an `extension' is not supported by actual practice in calculus; calculus has nothing to do with `extensions'. The extensional, set-theoretic conception of a real number does not give a foundation for real analysis, either. The so-called complete theory of real numbers, which is essentially an extensional approach, does not define (in any sense of the word) the set of real numbers so as to justify their completeness, despite the common belief to the contrary. The only correct foundation of real analysis consists in its being `existential axiomatics'. And in real analysis, as existential axiomatics, a point on the real line need not be an `extension'.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
Anderson Nakano;
(2021)
On Ramsey’s reason to amend Principia Mathematica’s logicism and Wittgenstein’s reaction
(/isis/citation/CBB314453813/)
Article
Nachtomya, Ohad;
(2011)
A Tale of Two Thinkers, One Meeting, and Three Degrees of Infinity: Leibniz and Spinoza (1675--8)
(/isis/citation/CBB001211008/)
Article
Emily Katz;
(2021)
What Numbers Could Not Be (for Aristotle)
(/isis/citation/CBB693325107/)
Article
Intisar-ul-haque, ;
(1978)
Wittgenstein on number
(/isis/citation/CBB000016759/)
Article
Lavers, Gregory;
(2013)
Frege, Carnap, and Explication: “Our Concern Here Is to Arrive at a Concept of Number Usable for the Purpose of Science”
(/isis/citation/CBB001212885/)
Article
Christine Chambris;
Jana Visnovska;
(2022)
On the history of units in French elementary school arithmetic: The case of proportionality
(/isis/citation/CBB935801822/)
Book
Kurt Godel;
Solomon Feferman;
John W. Dawson;
Warren Goldfarb;
Charles Parsons;
Wilfried Sieg;
(2013)
Kurt Gödel: Collected Works: Volume IV
(/isis/citation/CBB660754544/)
Chapter
Annalisa Coliva;
(2016)
Wittgenstein su rito, filosofia, scienza e progresso. Quattro temi a partire dalle "Note sul Ramo d'oro" di Frazer
(/isis/citation/CBB205077993/)
Article
John Erik Hmiel;
(2016)
Wittgenstein and the Genesis of Neo-Pragmatism in American Thought
(/isis/citation/CBB708124579/)
Book
Jonathan Beale;
Ian James Kidd;
(2017)
Wittgenstein and Scientism
(/isis/citation/CBB047756067/)
Article
Kjaergaard, Peter C.;
(2002)
Hertz and Wittgenstein's Philosophy of Science
(/isis/citation/CBB000300476/)
Book
Nedo, Michael;
(2013)
Wittgenstein: una biografia per immagini
(/isis/citation/CBB001213930/)
Book
Diamond, Cora;
(2004)
L'esprit réaliste: Wittgenstein, la philosophie et l'esprit
(/isis/citation/CBB000772837/)
Article
David Loner;
(2020)
Alice Ambrose and the American Reception of Wittgenstein's Philosophy of Mathematics, 1935–75
(/isis/citation/CBB296871977/)
Essay Review
Klagge, James C.;
(2000)
The difficulty here is: To stop
(/isis/citation/CBB000110354/)
Article
Godart-Wendling, Béatrice;
(2014)
L'hypothèse de Firth: Wittgenstein, héritier de Malinowski?
(/isis/citation/CBB001450843/)
Article
Ahmet Süner;
(2016)
The Ambiguous Pictures in the Theory of Language in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus
(/isis/citation/CBB067449582/)
Book
Edmonds, David;
Eidinow, John;
(2001)
Wittgenstein's Poker: The Story of a Ten-Minute Argument between Two Great Philosophers
(/isis/citation/CBB000358471/)
Book
Biletzki, Anat;
(2003)
(Over) Interpreting Wittgenstein
(/isis/citation/CBB000471184/)
Chapter
Carlo Casolo;
(2018)
La Biblioteca Universale
(/isis/citation/CBB604701261/)
Be the first to comment!