Article ID: CBB001201354

Morality and Nature: Evolutionary Challenges to Christian Ethics (2014)

unapi

Keywords: anthropology;Thomas Aquinas;Christianity;emotions;evolutionary biology;morality;personhood Abstract Christian ethics accentuates in manifold ways the unique character of human nature. Personalists believe that the mind is never reducible to material and physical substance. The human person is presented as the supreme principle, based on arguments referring to free-willed actions, the immateriality of both the divine spirit and the reflexive capacity, intersubjectivity and self-consciousness. But since Darwin, evolutionary biology slowly instructs us that morality roots in dispositions that are programmed by evolution into our nature. Historically, Thomas Huxley, Darwin's bulldog, agreed with Darwin on almost everything, except for his gradualist position on moral behavior. Huxley's saltationism has recently been characterized by Frans de Waal as a veneer theory of morality. Does this mark the end of a period of presenting morality as only the fruit of socialization processes (nurture) and as having nothing in common with nature? Does it necessarily imply a corrosion of personalist views on the human being or do Christian ethics have to become familiar again with their ancient roots?

...More
Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB001201354/

Similar Citations

Article Preece, Rod; (2003)
Darwinism, Christianity, and the Great Vivisection Debate (/isis/citation/CBB000774479/)

Book Huxley, Thomas Henry; (2001)
Collected Essays of T. H. Huxley (/isis/citation/CBB000102541/)

Article Allhoff, Fritz; (2003)
Evolutionary Ethics from Darwin to Moore (/isis/citation/CBB000600335/)

Book England, Richard; (2003)
Design after Darwin, 1860--1900 (/isis/citation/CBB000330936/)

Book Michael Davis; (2006)
George Eliot and Nineteenth-Century Psychology: Exploring the Unmapped Country (/isis/citation/CBB890472950/)

Book Peter J. Woodford; (2018)
The Moral Meaning of Nature: Nietzsche's Darwinian Religion and Its Critics (/isis/citation/CBB934342635/)

Chapter Sydow, Momme von; (2005)
Charles Darwin: A Christian Undermining Christianity? (/isis/citation/CBB000772009/)

Article Van Wyhe, John; Pallen, Mark J.; (2012)
The “Annie Hypothesis”: Did the Death of His Daughter Cause Darwin to “Give up Christianity”? (/isis/citation/CBB001232516/)

Book Umansky, Ellen M.; (2005)
From Christian Science to Jewish Science: Spiritual Healing and American Jews (/isis/citation/CBB000500373/)

Book Schoepflin, Rennie B.; (2002)
Christian Science on Trial: Religious Healing in America (/isis/citation/CBB000201545/)

Article Ambrose, C. T.; (2010)
Darwin's Historical Sketch---An American Predecessor: C. S. Rafinesque (/isis/citation/CBB001031431/)

Book Dilley, Stephen; (2013)
Darwinian Evolution and Classical Liberalism: Theories in Tension (/isis/citation/CBB001420122/)

Article Engels, Eve-Marie; (2005)
Charles Darwin's Moral Sense---On Darwin's Ethics of Non-Violence (/isis/citation/CBB000933655/)

Article Ishak, Mohd. Shuhaimi Bin; Haneef, Sayed Sikandar Shah; (2014)
Reproductive Technology: A Critical Analysis of Theological Responses in Christianity and Islam (/isis/citation/CBB001201355/)

Chapter Nys, Michiel; (2013)
“An Undue Simplification”: Tennyson's Evolutionary Afterlife (/isis/citation/CBB001422075/)

Authors & Contributors
Woodford, Peter
Jonathan R. Topham
Holmes, Tarquin
Priest, Greg
Nys, Michiel
van Wyhe, John
Concepts
Science and religion
Science and ethics
Evolution
Christianity
Moral philosophy
Science and literature
Time Periods
19th century
20th century
21st century
20th century, early
Places
Great Britain
United States
England
Institutions
Royal Commission on Vivisection (1875)
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment