Ayala, Francisco José (Editor)
Arp, Robert (Editor)
Description Contents:
Review Shanahan, Timothy (2010) Review of "Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology". Science and Education (p. 1029).
Review Ioannidis, Stavros (2011) Review of "Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology". Metascience: An International Review Journal for the History, Philosophy and Social Studies of Science (p. 351).
Chapter Ayala, Francisco J. (2010) There Is No Place for Intelligent Design in the Philosophy of Biology: Intelligent Design Is Not Science. In: Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology.
Chapter Ayala, Francisco J. (2010) What the Biological Sciences Can and Cannot Contribute to Ethics. In: Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology.
Chapter Downes, Stephen M. (2010) The Basic Components of the Human Mind Were Not Solidified during the Pleistocene Epoch. In: Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology.
Chapter Minelli, Alessandro (2010) Evolutionary Developmental Biology Does Not Offer a Significant Challenge to the Neo-Darwinian Paradigm. In: Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology.
Chapter Laubichler, Manfred D. (2010) Evolutionary Developmental Biology Offers a Significant Challenge to the Neo-Darwinian Paradigm. In: Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology.
Chapter Dietrich, Michael R. (2010) Microevolution and Macroevolution Are Governed by the Same Processes. In: Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology.
Chapter Sapienza, Carmen (2010) Selection Does Operate Primarily on Genes: In Defense of the Gene as the Unit of Selection. In: Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology.
Chapter Mishler, Brent D. (2010) Species Are Not Uniquely Real Biological Entities. In: Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology.
Chapter Cummins, Robert; Roth, Martin (2010) Traits Have Not Evolved to Function the Way They Do Because of a Past Advantage. In: Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology.
Chapter Dupré, John (2010) It Is Not Possible to Reduce Biological Explanations to Explanations in Chemistry and/or Physics. In: Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology.
Chapter Keller, Evelyn Fox (2010) It Is Possible to Reduce Biological Explanations to Explanations in Chemistry and/or Physics. In: Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology.
Chapter Ratzsch, Del (2010) There Is a Place for Intelligent Design in the Philosophy of Biology: Intelligent Design in (Philosophy of) Biology: Some Legitimate Roles. In: Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology.
Chapter Ruse, Michael (2010) The Biological Sciences Can Act as a Ground for Ethics. In: Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology.
Chapter Wimsatt, William C. (2010) Memetics Does Not Provide a Useful Way of Understanding Cultural Evolution: A Developmental Perspective. In: Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology.
Chapter Blackmore, Susan (2010) Memetics Does Provide a Useful Way of Understanding Cultural Evolution. In: Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology.
Chapter Starratt, Valerie G.; Shackelford, Todd K. (2010) The Basic Components of the Human Mind Were Solidified during the Pleistocene Epoch. In: Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology.
Chapter Erwin, Douglas H. (2010) Microevolution and Macroevolution Are Not Governed by the Same Processes. In: Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology.
Chapter Burian, Richard M. (2010) Selection Does Not Operate Primarily on Genes. In: Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology.
Chapter Claridge, Michael F. (2010) Species Are Real Biological Entities. In: Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology.
Chapter Perlman, Mark (2010) Traits Have Evolved to Function the Way They Do Because of a Past Advantage. In: Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology.
Book
Love, Alan C.;
(2015)
Conceptual Change in Biology: Scientific And Philosophical Perspectives on Evolution and Development
(/isis/citation/CBB001550598/)
Thesis
Brigandt, Ingo;
(2006)
A Theory of Conceptual Advance: Explaining Conceptual Change in Evolutionary, Molecular, and Evolutionary Developmental Biology
(/isis/citation/CBB001560506/)
Article
Stamos, David N.;
(2002)
Species, Languages, and the Horizontal/Vertical Distinction
(/isis/citation/CBB000200252/)
Book
Creath, Richard;
Maienschein, Jane;
(2000)
Biology and epistemology
(/isis/citation/CBB000110573/)
Book
Robert, Jason Scott;
(2004)
Embryology, Epigenesis, and Evolution: Taking Development Seriously
(/isis/citation/CBB000770170/)
Thesis
Hendrikse, Jesse Love;
(2006)
Explanation and Inheritance
(/isis/citation/CBB001561700/)
Article
Wimsatt, William;
(2001)
Richard Levins as Philosophical Revolutionary
(/isis/citation/CBB000100683/)
Article
Goodenough, Ursula;
(2001)
Genomes, Gould, and Emergence
(/isis/citation/CBB000102264/)
Article
Sandy C. Boucher;
(2017)
Gould on species, metaphysics and macroevolution: A critical appraisal
(/isis/citation/CBB083237950/)
Article
Comfort, Nathaniel;
(2008)
Cultural Darwinism
(/isis/citation/CBB001030488/)
Article
Kleiner, Scott A.;
(2003)
Explanatory Coherence and Empirical Adequacy: The Problem of Abduction, and the Justification of Evolutionary Models
(/isis/citation/CBB000340587/)
Book
Alessandro Minelli;
(2015)
Descrivere e interpretare il vivente
(/isis/citation/CBB562684633/)
Article
Gurdon, John B.;
Hopwood, Nick;
(2000)
The introduction of Xenopus laevis into developmental biology: Of empire, pregnancy testing and ribosomal genes
(/isis/citation/CBB000101427/)
Article
Reydon, Thomas A. C.;
(2005)
On the Nature of the Species Problem and the Four Meanings of `Species'
(/isis/citation/CBB000501587/)
Article
Philippe Huneman;
(2019)
The Multifaceted Legacy of the Human Genome Program for Evolutionary Biology: An Epistemological Perspective
(/isis/citation/CBB904878427/)
Thesis
Robert, Jason Scott;
(2000)
Taking development seriously: Toward a genuinely synthetic biology
(/isis/citation/CBB001562184/)
Article
Ricardo Noguera-Solano;
Juan Manuel Rodríguez-Caso;
Rosaura Ruiz-Gutiérrez;
(2021)
The Evolutionary Thought of Jean-Baptiste Lamarck
(/isis/citation/CBB508803217/)
Article
Daniel J. Molter;
(2022)
Bivalent Selection and Graded Darwinian Individuality
(/isis/citation/CBB094549170/)
Article
Reydon, Thomas A. C.;
(2003)
Discussion: Species Are Individuals; Or Are They?
(/isis/citation/CBB000410818/)
Article
Stijn Conix;
(2019)
Radical pluralism, classificatory norms and the legitimacy of species classifications
(/isis/citation/CBB345206372/)
Be the first to comment!