IsisCB Explore

Article ID: CBB001023966

Weismann, Wittgenstein and the Homunculus Fallacy (2010)

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences
Volume: 41
Pages: 263--271

Outside Links

WorldCat

Google Scholar

JSTOR

Academia.edu

Philosophy of biology Biology Darwinism Instinct Lamarckism 20th century 19th century Wittgenstein, Ludwig Weismann, August

A problem that has troubled both neo-Darwinists and neo-Lamarckians is whether instincts involve knowledge. This paper discusses the contributions to this problem of the evolutionary biologist August Weismann and the philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein. Weismann discussed an empirical homunculus fallacy: Lamarck's theory mistakenly presupposes a homunculus in the germ cells. Wittgenstein discussed a conceptual homunculus fallacy which applies to Lamarck's theory: it is mistaken to suppose that knowledge is stored in the brain or DNA. The upshot of these two fallacies is that instincts arise through a neo-Darwinian process but are not cognitions in the sense that they involve (the recollection of stored) knowledge. Although neo-Lamarckians have rightly argued that learning processes may contribute to the development of instincts, their ideas about the role of knowledge in the evolution and development of instincts are mistaken.

...More

Description Discusses the problem addressed by August Weismann and Ludwig Wittgenstein of whether instincts involve knowledge.

Citation URI

http://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB001023966/

Citations Indexes

Similar Citations

Article Sunhee Han; (2019)
The Connection between Charles Darwin’s Evolutionary Theory of ‘Heredity of Behaviors’ and the 19th Century Neuroscience: The Influence of Neuroscience on Darwin’s Overcoming of Lamarck’s Theory of Evolution (/isis/citation/CBB885733380/)

Article Loison, Laurent; (2011)
French Roots of French Neo-Lamarckisms, 1879--1985 (/isis/citation/CBB001220959/)

Book Brzezinski Prestes, Maria Elice; Martins, Lilian Al-Chueyr Pereira; Stefano, Waldir; (2006)
Filosofia e História da Biologia 1 (/isis/citation/CBB000820181/)

Article Weber, Bruce H.; (2007)
Fact, Phenomenon, and Theory in the Darwinian Research Tradition (/isis/citation/CBB001230132/)

Chapter Sleigh, Charlotte; (2004)
“The Ninth Mortal Sin”: The Lamarckism of W. M. Wheeler (/isis/citation/CBB000520043/)

Article Rieppel, Olivier; (2012)
Karl Beurlen (1901--1985), Nature Mysticism, and Aryan Paleontology (/isis/citation/CBB001221003/)

Article Richardson, Angelique; (2010)
Darwin and Reductionisms: Victorian, Neo-Darwinian and Postgenomic Biologies (/isis/citation/CBB001022449/)

Book Eldredge, Niles; (2015)
Eternal Ephemera: Adaptation and the Origin of Species from the Nineteenth Century through Punctuated Equilibria and Beyond (/isis/citation/CBB001551081/)

Article Moreno, Juan; (2009)
Lamarck necesita a Darwin: la búsqueda de intención en el estudio de la evolución y de la historia (/isis/citation/CBB001020976/)

Book Gillott, David; (2015)
Samuel Butler against the Professionals: Rethinking Lamarckism 1860-1900 (/isis/citation/CBB001551952/)

Book Gissis, Snait B.; Jablonka, Eva; (2011)
Transformations of Lamarckism: From Subtle Fluids to Molecular Biology (/isis/citation/CBB001500079/)

Chapter Wilkins, Adam; (2011)
Why Did the Modern Synthesis Give Short Shrift to “Soft Inheritance”? (/isis/citation/CBB001500092/)

Thesis Yamashita, Grant Joo; (2006)
On the Germ-Soma Distinction in Evolutionary Biology: A Historical and Conceptual Approach (/isis/citation/CBB001560834/)

Article Poreau, Brice; (2011)
Commensalisme, mutualisme, parasitisme, une preuve de l'Evolution pour Etienne Rabaud? (/isis/citation/CBB001220813/)

Article David Ceccarelli; (2019)
Between Social and Biological Heredity: Cope and Baldwin on Evolution, Inheritance, and Mind (/isis/citation/CBB525461961/)

Article Ute Deichmann; (2016)
Why epigenetics is not a vindication of Lamarckism – and why that matters (/isis/citation/CBB175338819/)

Chapter Gissis, Snait B.; Jablonka, Eva; (2011)
Lamarckian Problematics in the Philosophy of Biology (/isis/citation/CBB001500106/)

Article Aronova, E. A.; (2002)
Karl Popper, “popperovskaia nauka” i diskussii o lamarkizme v biologii 1960-1980-kh gg (/isis/citation/CBB000203007/)

Essay Review Lovejoy, Derek; (2002)
Biology as Ideology (/isis/citation/CBB000201172/)

Article Bechtel, William; (2010)
The Cell: Locus or Object of Inquiry? (/isis/citation/CBB001023957/)