Article ID: CBB001022757

“Divine Right” or Democracy? The Royal Society “Revolt” of 1935 (2010)

unapi

In October 1934, several Fellows of the Royal Society submitted a petition critical of the oligarchic nature of the Society's Council and the power wielded by a small elite in the Society's activities. The `Royal Society Reform Group' also voiced concern over the Society's neglect of the increasingly pressing public issue of the `social responsibility of science', and fundamentally questioned the role of the Royal Society as a representative body for science. Against a background of national economic crisis and political upheaval, the reformers sought to ensure that the Royal Society should act as an authoritative public voice for scientists rather than for establishment science. In so doing they raised profound political issues concerning the relationships between the Society, working scientists, other scientific institutions and the wider polity. The Reform Group's campaign culminated in the first contested Council election in living memory in November 1935, when more than half of the Fellowship attended in person to vote. In this paper I explore the activities and changing public role of the Royal Society in the inter-war years, the reformers' campaign, the Royal Society's response and the outcomes of this `Revolt in the Royal Society'.

...More
Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB001022757/

Similar Citations

Article Jenkin, John; (2004)
William Henry Bragg in Adelaide: Beginning Research at a Colonial Locality (/isis/citation/CBB000410767/)

Article Hemmen, George E.; (2010)
Royal Society Expeditions in the Second Half of the Twentieth Century (/isis/citation/CBB001022756/)

Article Collins, Peter; (2010)
A Role in Running UK Science? (/isis/citation/CBB001022758/)

Article Horrocks, Sally M.; (2010)
The Royal Society, Its Fellows and Industrial R&D in the Mid Twentieth Century (/isis/citation/CBB001022751/)

Article MacLeod, Roy; (2010)
The Royal Society and the Commonwealth: Old Friendships, New Frontiers (/isis/citation/CBB001022760/)

Article Tina Skouen; (2020)
Brian Cox and the new enlightenment (/isis/citation/CBB526278326/)

Article Hughes, Jeff; (2012)
Doing Diaries: David Martin, the Royal Society and Scientific London, 1947-1950 (/isis/citation/CBB001251443/)

Article Thomas, Sir John Meurig; (2011)
Picking Winners: W. H. and W. L. Bragg at the Royal Institution (/isis/citation/CBB001220417/)

Book Peter Ayres; (2020)
Women and the Natural Sciences in Edwardian Britain: In Search of Fellowship (/isis/citation/CBB785418051/)

Article Jenkin, John G.; (2011)
Atomic Energy Is “Moonshine”: What Did Rutherford Really Mean? (/isis/citation/CBB001036136/)

Article Attie, Katherine Bootle; (2013)
Selling Science: Bacon, Harvey and the Commodification of Knowledge (/isis/citation/CBB001320085/)

Article Crosland, Maurice; (2010)
Pensions for “Cultivators of Science” (/isis/citation/CBB001031489/)

Book Trenn, Thaddeus J.; (1977)
The self-splitting atom: The history of the Rutherford-Soddy collaboration (/isis/citation/CBB000015654/)

Book Steven Turner; (2020)
The Science of James Smithson: Discoveries from the Smithsonian Founder (/isis/citation/CBB562434087/)

Authors & Contributors
Jenkin, John G.
Hughes, Jeff
Turner, Steven
Withers, Charles W. J.
Trenn, Thaddeus J.
Todd, Neil
Concepts
Societies; institutions; academies
Science and society
Physics
Government sponsored science
Science and government
Scientific communities; interprofessional relations
Time Periods
20th century, early
19th century
20th century
18th century
20th century, late
17th century
Places
Great Britain
Australia
England
Ireland
Institutions
Royal Society of London
International Geophysical Year (IGY)
Smithsonian Institution
Royal Institution of Great Britain
British Association for the Advancement of Science
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment