Historians often feel that standard philosophical doctrines about the nature and development of science are not adequate for representing the real history of science. However, when philosophers of science fail to make sense of certain historical events, it is also possible that there is something wrong with the standard historical descriptions of those events, precluding any sensible explanation. If so, philosophical failure can be useful as a guide for improving historiography, and this constitutes a significant mode of productive interaction between the history and the philosophy of science. I illustrate this methodological claim through the case of the Chemical Revolution. I argue that no standard philosophical theory of scientific method can explain why European chemists made a sudden and nearly unanimous switch of allegiance from the phlogiston theory to Lavoisier's theory. A careful re-examination of the history reveals that the shift was neither so quick nor so unanimous as imagined even by many historians. In closing I offer brief reflections on how best to explain the general drift toward Lavoisier's theory that did take place. Chemical Revolution, phlogiston, history and philosophy of science, scientific change, Lavoisier
...More
Article
Nicholas W. Best;
(2016)
Lavoisier’s “Reflections on Phlogiston” II: On the Nature of Heat
(/isis/citation/CBB776078651/)
Article
Silva, Marcos Rodrigues da;
(2013)
Ensino de ciências: realismo, antirrealismo e a construção do conceito de oxigênio
(/isis/citation/CBB001420650/)
Article
Boantza, Victor;
(2008)
The Phlogistic Role of Heat in the Chemical Revolution and the Origins of Kirwan's “Ingenious Modifications...Into the Theory of Phlogiston”
(/isis/citation/CBB000774842/)
Article
Kawashima, Keiko;
(2003)
Madame Lavoisier et l'Essai sur le phlogistique
(/isis/citation/CBB000470206/)
Article
Wolfgang Lefèvre;
(2018)
The Méthode de nomenclature chimique (1787): A Document of Transition
(/isis/citation/CBB097357446/)
Book
Frercks, Jan;
(2008)
Antoine Laurent Lavoisier: System der antiphlogistischen Chemie
(/isis/citation/CBB001020636/)
Article
Mauskopf, Seymour;
(2002)
Richard Kirwan's Phlogiston Theory: Its Success and Fate
(/isis/citation/CBB000470885/)
Article
Kim, Mi Gyung;
(2011)
From Phlogiston to Caloric: Chemical Ontologies
(/isis/citation/CBB001024703/)
Book
Maria Teresa Monti;
(2023)
L'azoto, il fosforo e la chimica nuova. Storie di luce e combustione (1774-1799)
(/isis/citation/CBB965333832/)
Article
Lewowicz, Lucía;
(2011)
Phlogiston, Lavoisier and the Purloined Referent
(/isis/citation/CBB001024187/)
Chapter
Carrier, Martin;
(2009)
Antoine Laurent de Lavoisier und die Chemische Revolution
(/isis/citation/CBB001023709/)
Article
Best, Nicholas W.;
(2015)
Lavoisier's “Reflections on Phlogiston” I: Against Phlogiston Theory
(/isis/citation/CBB001552591/)
Thesis
John A. Stewart;
(2013)
Chemical Affinity in Eighteenth-Century Scottish Physiology and Agriculture
(/isis/citation/CBB001567441/)
Article
Lehman, Christine;
(2009)
Les deux faces de la chimie de Venel: Côté cours, côté Encyclopédie
(/isis/citation/CBB001021111/)
Article
Labinger, Jay A.;
Weininger, Stephen J.;
(2005)
Controversy in Chemistry: How Do You Prove a Negative? The Cases of Phlogiston and Cold Fusion
(/isis/citation/CBB001032168/)
Article
Jacobsen, Anja Skaar;
(2000)
A. W. Hauch's role in the introduction of antiphlogistic chemistry into Denmark
(/isis/citation/CBB000111593/)
Article
Hoyningen-Huene, Paul;
(2008)
Thomas Kuhn and the Chemical Revolution
(/isis/citation/CBB000930621/)
Article
Miller, David Philip;
Levere, Trevor H.;
(2008)
“Inhale It and See?” The Collaboration between Thomas Beddoes and James Watt in Pneumatic Medicine
(/isis/citation/CBB000774132/)
Thesis
Nicholas William Best;
(2018)
The Chemical Revolution as Scientific, Political and Semantic Revolution
(/isis/citation/CBB809833125/)
Article
Boantza, Victor D.;
Gal, Ofer;
(2011)
The “Absolute Existence” of Phlogiston: The Losing Party's Point of View
(/isis/citation/CBB001024705/)
Be the first to comment!