Inferences from scientific success to the approximate truth of successful theories remain central to the most influential arguments for scientific realism. Challenges to such inferences, however, based on radical discontinuities within the history of science, have motivated a distinctive style of revision to the original argument. Conceding the historical claim, selectiverealists argue that accompanying even the most revolutionary change is the retention of significant partsof replaced theories, and that a realist attitude towards the systematically retained constituents of our scientific theories can still be defended. Selective realists thereby hope to secure the argument from success against apparent historical counterexamples. Independently of that objective, historical considerations have inspired a further argument for selective realism, where evidence for the retention of parts of theories is itself offered as justification for adopting a realist attitude towards them. Given the nature of these arguments from success and from retention, a reasonable expectation is that they would complement and reinforce one another, but although several theses purport to provide such a synthesis the results are often unconvincing. In this paper I reconsider the realist's favoured type of scientific success, novel success, offer a revised interpretation of the concept, and argue that a significant consequence of reconfiguring the realist's argument from success accordingly is a greater potential for its unification with the argument from retention.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Book
Evandro Agazzi;
(2014)
Scientific Objectivity and Its Contexts
(/isis/citation/CBB896368292/)
Article
Robyn Yucel;
(2018)
Scientists’ Ontological and Epistemological Views about Science from the Perspective of Critical Realism
(/isis/citation/CBB219306053/)
Book
Parsons, Keith M.;
(2014)
It Started with Copernicus: Vital Questions about Science
(/isis/citation/CBB001510107/)
Article
Matthias Neuber;
(2020)
Two Forms of American Critical Realism: Perception and Reality in Santayana/Strong and Sellars
(/isis/citation/CBB019756706/)
Article
van Heur, Bas;
Leydesdorff, Loet;
Wyatt, Sally;
(June 2013)
Turning to ontology in STS? Turning to STS through ‘ontology’
(/isis/citation/CBB199076323/)
Article
Karitzis, A.;
(2005)
Sellars on Science and Ontological Committment
(/isis/citation/CBB000931341/)
Thesis
Heberlig, Nathan;
(2007)
On the Ontological Status of Space-Time: Scientific Realism and GeometricalExplanation
(/isis/citation/CBB001561278/)
Article
David Merritt;
(2021)
Cosmological Realism
(/isis/citation/CBB244895079/)
Article
Quale, Andreas;
(2011)
On the Role of Mathematics in Physics
(/isis/citation/CBB001032754/)
Essay Review
Brysse, Keynyn;
(2010)
Cryptozoology, Archaeology and Palaeontology: Histories Near the High Table
(/isis/citation/CBB001566356/)
Book
Turner, Derek D.;
(2007)
Making Prehistory: Historical Science and the Scientific Realism Debate
(/isis/citation/CBB000830147/)
Article
French, Steven;
(2011)
Shifting to Structures in Physics and Biology: A Prophylactic for Promiscuous Realism
(/isis/citation/CBB001024001/)
Book
Groff, Ruth;
(2004)
Critical Realism, Post-Positivism, and the Possibility of Knowledge
(/isis/citation/CBB000401064/)
Article
Martin, Oliver;
(2001)
La Question du réalisme en psychologie: Études d'un débat entre arguments mathématiques et arguments empiriques
(/isis/citation/CBB000340527/)
Article
Fiora Salis;
(2021)
The New Fiction View of Models
(/isis/citation/CBB270986404/)
Article
Gelfert, Axel;
(2011)
Model-Based Representation in Scientific Practice: New Perspectives
(/isis/citation/CBB001024167/)
Article
Pietro Gori;
(2021)
Ernst Mach’s Contribution to the Philosophy of Science in Light of Mary B. Hesse’s Postempiricism
(/isis/citation/CBB711827914/)
Book
Carl Posy;
Yemima Ben-Menahem;
(2023)
Mathematical Knowledge, Objects and Applications: Essays in Memory of Mark Steiner
(/isis/citation/CBB349670710/)
Article
Justin Price;
(2019)
The landing zone – Ground for model transfer in chemistry
(/isis/citation/CBB898182417/)
Article
McManus, Fabrizzio;
(2012)
Development and Mechanistic Explanation
(/isis/citation/CBB001221636/)
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences
Science and Education
HOPOS
Social Studies of Science
Neusis: The Greek Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology
Be the first to comment!