Two complementary debates of the turn of the nineteenth and twentieth century are examined here: the debate on the legitimacy of hypotheses in the natural sciences and the debate on intentionality and `representations without object' in philosophy. Both are shown to rest on two core issues: the attitude of the subject and the mode of presentation chosen to display a domain of phenomena. An orientation other than the one which contributed to shape twentieth-century philosophy of science is explored through the analysis of the role given to assumptions in Boltzmann's research strategy, where assumptions are contrasted to hypotheses, axioms, and principles, and in Meinong's criticism of the privileged status attributed to representations in mental activities. Boltzmann's computational style in mathematics and Meinong's criticism of the confusion between representation and judgment give prominence to an indirect mode of presentation, adopted in a state of suspended belief which is characteristic of assumptions and which enables one to grasp objects that cannot be reached through direct representation or even analogies. The discussion shows how assumptions and the movement to fiction can be essential steps in the quest for objectivity. The conclusion restates the issues of the two debates in a contemporary perspective and shows how recent developments in philosophy of science and philosophy of language and mind can be brought together by arguing for a twofold conception of reference.
...More
Essay Review
Janiak, Andrew;
(2011)
The Kantian Spirit: How to Resist Realism in the Philosophy of Science
(/isis/citation/CBB001566746/)
Book
Blackmore, John T.;
(2010)
Ernst Mach's Prague (1867--1895) as a Human Adventure
(/isis/citation/CBB001024111/)
Article
van Strien, Marij;
(2013)
The Nineteenth Century Conflict between Mechanism and Irreversibility
(/isis/citation/CBB001213355/)
Article
Kidd, Ian James;
(2011)
Objectivity, Abstraction, and the Individual: The Influence of Søren Kierkegaard on Paul Feyerabend
(/isis/citation/CBB001024147/)
Article
Pihlström, Sami;
(2008)
How (Not) to Write the History of Pragmatist Philosophy of Science?
(/isis/citation/CBB000831774/)
Article
Schmitt, Richard Henry;
(2011)
Models, Their Application, and Scientific Anticipation: Ludwig Boltzmann's Work as Tacit Knowing
(/isis/citation/CBB001034405/)
Article
Carlo Ginzburg;
(2017)
Schemi, preconcetti, esperimenti a doppio cieco. Riflessioni di uno storico
(/isis/citation/CBB147802268/)
Chapter
Şengör, A. M. C.;
(2004)
The Repeated Rediscovery of Mélanges and Its Implications for the Possibility and the Role of Objective Evidence in the Scientific Enterprise
(/isis/citation/CBB000650925/)
Essay Review
Dear, Peter;
Hacking, Ian;
Jones, Matthew L.;
Daston, Lorraine;
Galison, Peter;
(2012)
Objectivity in Historical Perspective
(/isis/citation/CBB001566761/)
Book
Lindenfeld, David F.;
(1980)
The transformation of positivism: Alexius Meinong and European thought, 1880-1920
(/isis/citation/CBB000013266/)
Thesis
Tousignant, Noemi R.;
(2006)
Pain and the Pursuit of Objectivity: Pain-Measuring Technologies in the UnitedStates, c. 1890--1975
(/isis/citation/CBB001561511/)
Essay Review
Pickstone, John V.;
(2009)
The Disunities of Representation
(/isis/citation/CBB001567038/)
Review
Stoliarova, Olga;
(2010)
Review of "Objectivity"
(/isis/citation/CBB001230059/)
Book
Daston, Lorraine;
Galison, Peter;
(2007)
Objectivity
(/isis/citation/CBB000773344/)
Chapter
Gerhardt, Uta;
(2006)
Zäsuren und Zeitperspektiven. Überlegungen zu “Wertfreiheit” und “Objektivität” als Problemen der Wissenschaftsgeschichte
(/isis/citation/CBB000953811/)
Book
Massimi, Michela;
(2008)
Kant and Philosophy of Science Today
(/isis/citation/CBB001032968/)
Chapter
Blackmore, John Thomas;
(2001)
Alois Höfler (1853-1922)
(/isis/citation/CBB000101428/)
Book
Meyerson, Émile;
Telkes, Eva;
Bensaude-Vincent, Bernadette;
(2011)
Mélanges: Petites Pieces Inédites
(/isis/citation/CBB001450981/)
Book
Achinstein, Peter;
(2005)
Scientific Evidence: Philosophical Theories and Applications
(/isis/citation/CBB000550211/)
Book
Blackmore, John T.;
(2009)
Ernst Mach's Philosophy---Pro and Con---with Contributions by Brentano, Carnap, Einstein, Husserl, Lenin, Mach, Planck, Popper, and Others
(/isis/citation/CBB001024109/)
Be the first to comment!